I don't think the article supports the certitude of the thread title. The article seems to indicate that it's inconclusive.Patriot101 said:
https://www.healthline.com/health/womens-health/period-syncing
Patriot101 said:
Please consider forgiving me. There isn't a science board. Didn't want to put it on the political board..but
"Inconclusive" indicates that there are far too many factors and unknowns to be able to determine the validity of the theory. It may be valid. It may not be. Inconclusive doesn't mean with any sense of certainty that it's a "myth".Patriot101 said:
Inconclusive appears to suggest that it's a myth to me.
Again, that's not really what the article is saying. It's inconclusive. Some studies have seemed to support it. Some have seemed to counter it. May be fact. May be opinion. It's inconclusive.Patriot101 said:
I will concede myth for opinion. Deal?
Is this really any different than you telling everyone that it's a myth? Neither position is confirmed, but they're statements based on anecdotal evidence that have studies both sides can point to, but is likely unknowable due to a multitude of factors.Patriot101 said:
Sure. But Karen tells her boyfriend or husband this and it is not grounded in science.
Semantics.
Patriot101 said:
Point is that some state syncing as fact.
Patriot101 said:
If I could edit the title, which I can't, I would change it to opinion.
It's merely an opinion that women sync up during their M-cycle.
Patriot101 said:
Please consider forgiving me. There isn't a science board. Didn't want to put it on the political board..but
Obviously it's not too trivial, as they've tried studying it and the results have been inconclusive. Then again, scientists study trivial things all the time.Patriot101 said:
It isn't a myth or an opinion. Women's periods sync up.
It's too trivial for science to study.