Doc Daneeka said:
You use the word coercion and that's wrong. If a store sets up an entrance that goes through a certain aisle first I don't consider that "coercion". That is a marketing tactic. We know for a fact, that laws influence the morality of certain people to and extent and that they end up believing in certain ideas. Why would Christians not attempt to influence all organizations like this. If influence can lead to true belief how is influence bad?
So, maybe the First Amendment should read:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of the One true Christian religion or any of those other stupid, fake, and immoral religions, or prohibiting the free exercise (even though exercising the wrong religion will send you to Hell) thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Hows that? Marketing! No forceful coercion involved and no freedoms removed.