*** THE ODYSSEY *** (Christopher Nolan)

376,775 Views | 4611 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by CharleyKerfeld
Bruce Almighty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think I remember reading something about how modern directors prefer natural dialogue which causes voices to get drowned out my music and effects.
tk for tu juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The theaters need to create a "Nolan setting" which bumps up the center channel dialog track for his films and has some negative gain on the other channels. Tenet went from rifle fire sounding like it was right next to my ear to trying to figure out what the Protagonist was mumble talking the rest of the time.
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All right, got my tickets for Thursday night. Normal sized-screen in Houston, plenty of good rows still available.



YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty much what my theater looked like.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
veryfuller said:

People always complain about the audio mix for Nolan, but other than Bane in TDKR, it's never been a problem for me. It truly makes me wonder what audio range people have going in and how much that plays in these issues.

Tenent was no walk in the park sound-wise.
Fenrir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Every Nolan movie starting with TDKR has had some amount of audio issues. Nolan decided using raw sound from a guy wearing a mask was the best plan for some reason.
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

veryfuller said:

People always complain about the audio mix for Nolan, but other than Bane in TDKR, it's never been a problem for me. It truly makes me wonder what audio range people have going in and how much that plays in these issues.

Tenent was no walk in the park sound-wise.

This is the only CN movie I have ever quit on. Maybe I was too tired but I think I maybe made it 30 minutes and just had no clue what was going on and could not really follow the dialogue.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hardcore Greg said:

captkirk said:

veryfuller said:

People always complain about the audio mix for Nolan, but other than Bane in TDKR, it's never been a problem for me. It truly makes me wonder what audio range people have going in and how much that plays in these issues.

Tenent was no walk in the park sound-wise.

This is the only CN movie I have ever quit on. Maybe I was too tired but I think I maybe made it 30 minutes and just had no clue what was going on and could not really follow the dialogue.

Ditto although I did finish it. I wonder if sound was one of the reasons I didn't like it. I don't recall.
YNWA_AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Just watched the making of documentary that they released today. I can't wait. Seeing it twice in 70mm imax in Dallas this weekend.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
veryfuller said:

Dude, you are just wrong about this, but I don't think there is any convincing you. As someone who follows movies and critics closely, there is a wide swath of critics who usually have very different takes from the consensus who are enjoying the movie. Does this mean general audiences will? Only time will tell, but it is something to note. You don't have to believe me about that, it doesn't hurt my feelings, its just funny that you are making these assertions when anyone who has been paying attention to movies and critics can see you don't know what you are talking about. You don't have to agree with these critics or like their take on movies, but to say they are Hollywood shills or bandwagoning, or whatever is just false.

My friend actually texted me the Ehrlich tweet saying "this dude doesn't like anything, so now im really excited".

Also, if you think people aren't incentivized to post negative reviews for the movie, given how controversial the movies has been already site unseen, then I don't know if you know how the internet works. A negative review, right now, is definitely going to increase someones profile/interaction/etc. and get them more attention/followers/etc.

BUT....I wasn't even talking about this movie specifically. I was talking about it as a common complaint with all Nolan movies. Its just interesting to me how it really bothers some people, and then there are people like me who don't even notice it.


He literally thinks HUNDREDS of people across hundreds of separate outlets, along with premiere attendees, filmmakers, military members, and their plus ones, are coordinating in sync to pimp/shill for a movie so as to either all...

1) virtue signal about being "woke," even though the very same people argue that the movie is NOT woke, and it's now been confirmed that the "woke" elements amount to, like, 5% of the movie, if that.

2) not **** on Christopher Nolan, as part of some unanimous, pro-Nolan cabal, despite half of Nolan's movie's being in the 80s on Rotten Tomatoes, one being in the 70s, and a number of his widely marketed producing efforts (using his name to sell them) being far lower than those.

It's some of the dumbest, most stubborn **** I've ever heard, and none of it makes a lick of sense.

It's all just his way of justifying the massive wave of good reviews, so as to desperately try and save face, so he can keep spreading his endless negativity and culture war bull**** here. Same goes for his ridiculously cliched view of Hollywood and how it works, like something out of a Fox News fever dream, from halfway across the country, clearly having never spent any real time here at all. He maintains this overall reductive world view because it's what allows him to, on a daily basis, mock and ***** and moan on the internet, something he sadly needs in his life / clearly gets off on.
CC09LawAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a very good point - I can't think of anytime within the past, say, 6 years, where the media has misled us about anything.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Relax buddy.
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

veryfuller said:

Dude, you are just wrong about this, but I don't think there is any convincing you. As someone who follows movies and critics closely, there is a wide swath of critics who usually have very different takes from the consensus who are enjoying the movie. Does this mean general audiences will? Only time will tell, but it is something to note. You don't have to believe me about that, it doesn't hurt my feelings, its just funny that you are making these assertions when anyone who has been paying attention to movies and critics can see you don't know what you are talking about. You don't have to agree with these critics or like their take on movies, but to say they are Hollywood shills or bandwagoning, or whatever is just false.

My friend actually texted me the Ehrlich tweet saying "this dude doesn't like anything, so now im really excited".

Also, if you think people aren't incentivized to post negative reviews for the movie, given how controversial the movies has been already site unseen, then I don't know if you know how the internet works. A negative review, right now, is definitely going to increase someones profile/interaction/etc. and get them more attention/followers/etc.

BUT....I wasn't even talking about this movie specifically. I was talking about it as a common complaint with all Nolan movies. Its just interesting to me how it really bothers some people, and then there are people like me who don't even notice it.


He literally thinks HUNDREDS of people across hundreds of separate outlets, along with premiere attendees, filmmakers, military members, and their plus ones, are coordinating in sync to pimp/shill for a movie so as to either all...

1) virtue signal about being "woke," even though the very same people argue that the movie is NOT woke, and it's now been confirmed that the "woke" elements amount to, like, 5% of the movie, if that.

2) not **** on Christopher Nolan, as part of some unanimous, pro-Nolan cabal, despite half of Nolan's movie's being in the 80s on Rotten Tomatoes, one being in the 70s, and a number of his widely marketed producing efforts (using his name to sell them) being far lower than those.

It's some of the dumbest, most stubborn **** I've ever heard, and none of it makes a lick of sense.

It's all just his way of justifying the massive wave of good reviews, so as to desperately try and save face, so he can keep spreading his endless negativity and culture war bull**** here. Same goes for his ridiculously cliched view of Hollywood and how it works, like something out of a Fox News fever dream, from halfway across the country, clearly having never spent any real time here at all. He maintains this overall reductive world view because it's what allows him to, on a daily basis, mock and ***** and moan on the internet, something he sadly needs in his life / clearly gets off on.


I am not saying it is the case with this movie, but there have been films in the past where I have almost gotten this type of vibe from the early reviews…


Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Again... not at this level.

Not in the hundreds.

I hear you, and I know what you're talking about, but those campaigns are always far smaller in number, and not across many dozens of screenings all over globe, consisting of such a variety of industry folk, premiere attendees, plus ones, etc.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe I missed it but this is this first time I've seen that Lupita's role is a cameo.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ah, yes "TRUSTED reactions," aka "the seven reactions we just happen to agree with, after we made up our mind weeks ago this thing was going to suck."
CC09LawAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"My random X posters are more credible than your random X posters!"
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Again... not at this level.

Not in the hundreds.

I hear you, and I know what you're talking about, but those campaigns are always far smaller in number, and not across many dozens of screenings all over globe, consisting of such a variety of industry folk, premiere attendees, plus ones, etc.

True...to begin with, would be almost impossible to coordinate...those news stations are at least largely affiliated.

I think the closest thing we may see in the movie critic world might be occasional biases at play or pressure to like a movie for some sort of social reason. I still think "One Battle" benefited from this to some degree (not trying to start a derail but that's my honest opinion). But this still appears to be the exception rather than the rule to me.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It has nothing to do with credibility.

It's just objectively hilarious that that person views HUNDREDS of positive reactions as NOT to be trusted, but, like, seven or whatever negative reactions as to be trusted.

People are going to dislike this movie for all kinds of real and valid reasons. I don't fault them for that at all.

But it's literally insane to write off all the hundreds of good reactions as shills, and then claim that the very few negative reactions are actually the ones to trust.

Especially when the people touting the "trusted" negative reviews had clearly already been hating on the movie, sight unseen.
One Eyed Reveille
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Omg he is an Urban Fantasy Author, as opposed to a suburban one ? I prefer my Fantasy Rural.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I kinda prefer the happy medium of suburban fantasy.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tk for tu juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I forgot IMAX controls the audio calibration daily with mics in the theater sending info back to central operations.

5:00 mark
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cliff.Booth said:

I kinda prefer the happy medium of suburban fantasy.

Yep..."Think less 'Hell's Angels', and more "Jayden's and Brayden's on hovering e-bikes"! Zooom!"

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You realize posting the exact same video twice on two different pages doesn't make it count as two negative reactions, right?

Also, I could do exactly what you do, just in the opposite direction, and claim that Gore does **** like this all the time, has an agenda, etc. Considering he often plays the contrarian to the positive reviews on any "controversial" culture war movie. This is par for the course for him.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cliff.Booth said:

I kinda prefer the happy medium of suburban fantasy.

Out of touch aren't you. Exurban Fantasy is where it's at.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Like I said before, it takes someone persona non grata to be able to be honest about this movie. That's why Gore can just say what the trailer made clear "it's just ok".
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right. And the hundreds of other critics, journalists, premiere attendees, plus ones, etc are all "compromised." Makes perfect sense.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Worth considering

Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most are, yes. You cannot trust mainstream journalists, critics, or influencers to tell the truth about anything. They perpetuate an echo chamber.
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cliff.Booth said:

Most are, yes. You cannot trust mainstream journalists, critics, or influencers to tell the truth about anything. They perpetuate an echo chamber.

Never trust any institution or group with a large % of white liberal females in it. That rule has never served me wrong.

I will genuinely skip over anything a white liberal woman has to say, even if just reviewing a movie.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a paranoid delusion, straight up.

Just because *some* fit that description doesn't mean they *all* fit that description.

Especially when the hundreds who have reacted to the movie aren't all "mainstream." Not even remotely, not by a long shot.

You're just making **** up to fit the narrative most convenient to your argument and reductive world view.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Being an alive, conscious adult who experienced the events of the last 10 years and asking the rhetorical question "yOu ReAllY ThInk HuNdrEdS Of JoUrnAliStS AnD EnTerTainMent InDuStry InSidErs WouLd LiE AbOuT ThE SaMe ThInG?" is funny and kind of sad.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hardcore Greg said:

Cliff.Booth said:

Most are, yes. You cannot trust mainstream journalists, critics, or influencers to tell the truth about anything. They perpetuate an echo chamber.

Never trust any institution or group with a large % of white liberal females in it. That rule has never served me wrong.

I will genuinely skip over anything a white liberal woman has to say, even if just reviewing a movie.

Boy, that is valid. It might need to be added to the death and taxes maxim.
First Page Last Page
Page 81 of 132
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.