*** UAP THREAD ***

454,483 Views | 5330 Replies | Last: 29 min ago by TCTTS
Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not sure if this link was posted on here. I know ufo's being built to spec by an undewater construction facility was at least mentioned in passing at some point. Anyways, I finally gave it a read and found it quite interesting.

4chan snapshat of the conversation - underwater construction facility


Quote:

tldr from reddit:

  • UFOs are primarily unmanned drones
  • UFOs are built to spec each time they are deployed
  • UFOs are created by a mobile construction facility that hides in the ocean
  • Construction facility destroys anything that comes close to it and will disappear for days when approached aggressively
  • US believes the facility has been active on earth for at least 100 years or much longer (100 years would explain some of the early crashes, but 4000 years would explain some of the supernatural accounts from a long time ago)
There is much more information in the thread if anyone is interested.

I do think it potentially provides some insight into why such matters might be kept confidential. If UFOs were simply arriving from other planets, it would be fascinating but might not present the same level of threat as the existence of an active base deploying UFOs for ongoing operations, with our apparent inability to intervene.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL, ok.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is this the same report that says the base is armed and destroys anything that comes within X amount of feet/miles of it? Either way, while this exact report could be bunk, I think it's absolutely possible that something like it could exist. There are more and more rumors/leaks that some of these things originate on our own planet (but don't belong to us), and there are of course all kinds of underwater sightings/radar pings. Couple that with the fact that we literally know more about the surface of the moon than we do our own oceans, and they would make for the perfect hiding spot.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr President Elect said:

I'm not sure if this link was posted on here. I know ufo's being built to spec by an undewater construction facility was at least mentioned in passing at some point. Anyways, I finally gave it a read and found it quite interesting.

4chan snapshat of the conversation - underwater construction facility


Quote:

tldr from reddit:

  • UFOs are primarily unmanned drones
  • UFOs are built to spec each time they are deployed
  • UFOs are created by a mobile construction facility that hides in the ocean
  • Construction facility destroys anything that comes close to it and will disappear for days when approached aggressively
  • US believes the facility has been active on earth for at least 100 years or much longer (100 years would explain some of the early crashes, but 4000 years would explain some of the supernatural accounts from a long time ago)
There is much more information in the thread if anyone is interested.

I do think it potentially provides some insight into why such matters might be kept confidential. If UFOs were simply arriving from other planets, it would be fascinating but might not present the same level of threat as the existence of an active base deploying UFOs for ongoing operations, with our apparent inability to intervene.


Quoting you from previous page so we can skip my "mocking" post.

Quote:

You guys are annoying and only comment to mock and state how ridiculous this stuff sounds.

Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Is this the same report that says the base is armed and destroys anything that comes within X amount of feet/miles of it? Either way, while this exact report could be bunk, I think it's absolutely possible that something like it could exist. There are more and more rumors/leaks that some of these things originate on our own planet (but don't belong to us), and there are of course all kinds of underwater sightings/radar pings. Couple that with the fact that we literally know more about the surface of the moon than we do our own oceans, and they would make for the perfect hiding spot.
Might be the same one. Says that it will move away (nearly instanteously) to avoid contact, but a few times that attempts were made to intercept it, they were "disapeared" without time to even know they were being attacked. The one he was tracking was (and stayed) in the Bermuda Triangle. Wasn't sure if there was others, could be, but he wasn't made aware.

Also, you have reports like Fravor, stating there was a disturbance at the surface of the water prior to seeing the tic-tac. Also, mentions that it could require extreme heat to create some of the alloys and that might be another reason for being underwater as a way to supress it.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That 4chan thread is wild. I don't really believe much of anything anymore, if it's BS, I want some badass BS…
Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiephoenix02 said:

That 4chan thread is wild. I don't really believe much of anything anymore, if it's BS, I want some badass BS…
I can appreciate that mentality.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
big fan of this

lunchtime desktop reading boys ... get it

https://imgur.com/a/NXjWQaN
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Encouraging news
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:



Not sure about the second tweet, that would be a bit of a letdown. Lue has been going on about something behind the scenes and says that will come out in 2024... so maybe that
Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
thanks for the imgur link, fascinating read.

two questions:
what did you think of that thread? and
do you find a lot of good content on imgur or 4chan?
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That thread was interesting. If it's fantasy it's pretty good stuff, it could be real though… as real as anything else…
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My thing is, that they don't know how long they've been here; they're like, "it's either been here a hundred years, or maybe 40,000 years, idk"…
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Couple things. We have to acknowledge something like is plausible, given the San Diego incidents testimony. Remember highly credential people with careers on the line said on record:
- objects were breaking known laws of gravity
- they slammed into the Pacific

That said, Q psyop (which Gen. Flynn said he was impressed by) should teach us that amazingly talented people use 4chan to troll. (Which I detailed multiple times on the thread, still mad it was nuked, I put up a lot of excellent analysis)
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiephoenix02 said:

That thread was interesting. If it's fantasy it's pretty good stuff, it could be real though… as real as anything else…
Someone could write a good fiction book or movie based on this.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Another incredibly compelling and thorough interview with this Ashton guy, re: MH370, this time from one of my favorite accounts, Project Unity, with a few new details. Having closely followed this subject for decades now, this continues to be one of the most convincing accounts I've ever heard, where the more people dig into it and try to debunk it, the more real it somehow becomes. When usually it's the exact opposite. What I also love about these presentations is that there's no sketchy sensationalism whatsoever, and no agenda beyond presenting the facts, along with an attempt to explain the more out there claims with science, then letting the viewer decide...

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is pretty much what many have been suspecting, but would still be so wild if true…

Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Another incredibly compelling and thorough interview with this Ashton guy, re: MH370, this time from one of my favorite accounts, Project Unity, with a few new details. Having closely followed this subject for decades now, this continues to be one of the most convincing accounts I've ever heard, where the more people dig into it and try to debunk it, the more real it somehow becomes. When usually it's the exact opposite. What I also love about these presentations is that there's no sketchy sensationalism whatsoever, and no agenda beyond presenting the facts, along with an attempt to explain the more out there claims with science, then letting the viewer decide...


I don't know... I've been lightly following that. Not saying it can't be real, but I just don't like some of his "methods" of connecting the dots. Like how he sensationalizes that wormholes are a real thing, and he had no idea. Yeah, mathematically they have been proven possible for decades and that isn't some big secret; just for starters, the energy requirements for them is the bigger issue rather than if they can actually exist. Then, there is the stating that the orbs fly like they do using superconductivity, I mean maybe, but sounds a lot more like this kid just learns buzz-words and throws them into the mix and says that must be the way this works.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He addresses the energy requirement thing in this latest interview, and then points to the superconductivity thing as being one possible explanation. I hear you on the kid-just-learning-buzz-words thing, but when it comes to the science, over and over again he reiterates that it's all possible explanations - not the explanations - simply as means to address the people who keep telling him "This is impossible!" He's merely saying, "Actually, nothing that happens in these videos is outside the realm of scientific possibility, for instance..." That's all he's doing.

Regardless, these are small quibbles that don't really affect the broader picture or the fact that to have faked these videos would require blockbuster-level expertise in CGI (especially for 2014), all kinds of deep knowledge of physics, knowledge of US military satellites the public had no access to/had never seen before, the frame rates of those satellites, satellite orbits, advanced drone knowledge, etc. Altogether, and this would literally be the greatest video hoax of all time, one that stretches nearly as much credulity as the event itself.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

He addresses the energy requirement thing in this latest interview, and then points to the superconductivity thing as being one possible explanation. I hear you on the kid-just-learning-buzz-words thing, but when it comes to the science, over and over again he reiterates that it's all possible explanations - not the explanations - simply as means to address the people who keep telling him "This is impossible!" He's merely saying, "Actually, nothing that happens in these videos is outside the realm of scientific possibility, for instance..." That's all he's doing.

Regardless, these are small quibbles that don't really affect the broader picture or the fact that to have faked these videos would require blockbuster-level expertise in CGI (especially for 2014), all kinds of deep knowledge of physics, knowledge of US military satellites the public had no access to/had never seen before, the frame rates of those satellites, satellite orbits, advanced drone knowledge, etc. Altogether, and this would literally be the greatest video hoax of all time, one that stretches nearly as much credulity as the event itself.
I mean, he included that stuff in his letter to congress. I was a little surprised he didn't state that we downloaded the plane from the cloud or something. When you start speculating about things you have no idea about, it really pollutes the entire conversation and reduces your credibility.

I agree 100% about the videos, and just think he would be better served just focusing on that. I've seen some stuff about him trying to trace back the leaker of it and stuff, and I am keeping an eye on that aspect of it. He just loses my attention when he tries to explain away what is in the video. At the end of the day, if the video is somehow verified to be real, well, it speaks for itself.
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where the hell did Spydey go?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He hasn't posted at all since October 3. I'm assuming he got perma-banned, for any number of reasons, but who knows. Honestly, I'm scared that if we speak his name too much he'll come back like Beetlejuice.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That MH370 video got me ****ed up.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's pretty wild.
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

He hasn't posted at all since October 3. I'm assuming he got perma-banned, for any number of reasons, but who knows. Honestly, I'm scared that if we speak his name too much he'll come back like Beetlejuice.


Hilariously, he usually draws bans from trolling the football board about the entrance song.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Beast of Burden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BenFiasco14 said:

TCTTS said:

He hasn't posted at all since October 3. I'm assuming he got perma-banned, for any number of reasons, but who knows. Honestly, I'm scared that if we speak his name too much he'll come back like Beetlejuice.


HilariouslyAnnoyingly, he usually draws bans from trolling the football board about the entrance song.


There. That's better.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Coincidentally, he posted seven times in a Premium thread titled "POWER" on October 3rd, his last day.
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Coincidentally, he posted seven times in a Premium thread titled "POWER" on October 3rd, his last day.


That had to be it, definitely a perma

He'll be back before long

RIP:
Spyderman
Charles Hickson Knows
McKelvey's Curse
Aztec
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
First Page Last Page
Page 72 of 153
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.