That's what I'm saying....it most certainly is. Perhaps it's not standard numerically based data, but it is.Agristotle said:
Agree! Remote Viewing is not "data"
Trust the data..guadalupeag said:TCTTS said:
No one is watching this Farsight stuff. And if they are, they aren't taking it seriously.
Plus, that Skeletor-looking dude is creepy as hell.
Why do you keep insisting on posting these?
Dude is either Redstone committed to his troll or so open minded to anything ET related that his brain has fallen out. Either way there's no way to win by engaging him.
Aztec1948 said:Trust the data..guadalupeag said:TCTTS said:
No one is watching this Farsight stuff. And if they are, they aren't taking it seriously.
Plus, that Skeletor-looking dude is creepy as hell.
Why do you keep insisting on posting these?
Dude is either Redstone committed to his troll or so open minded to anything ET related that his brain has fallen out. Either way there's no way to win by engaging him.
Horses, here is water... 3rd Eye Spies documentary is your ticket.
Ever wonder how/who constructed the Great Pyramid? Now, you may not agree with the method used to collect the data. You may find the people involved.."odd". You may not totally understand the technique used to produce the data. Perhaps you believe they are lying. Erroneous data, incorrect data..etc etc. Here is the data collected via remote viewing with the target being The Great Pyramid.
TCTTS said:
To be crystal clear, something along these lines is what I was waiting for, in terms of it being debunked. Whenever things like this have been debunked in the past, it's often due to some Googlable image element that someone IDs via reverse image search, everyone agrees it's a hoax, and that's that.
The difference here, however, is that this element apparently isn't Googlable, was apparently even in a zip file, and apparently originated from a physical CD from 1998. So the chances of this dude randomly happening to come across an exact match are pretty astronomical. Not impossible, of course, but it's not quite the same as how this usually goes down. Which potentially points to shenanigans of some sort, which makes me want to hit pause, just for a second, to see where this goes.
I shall. Next month will be the anniversary of the tragedy of 9/11. Farsight Institute did an extensive project involving many of the key elements of that day. I suspect the opportunity to see that data will present itself.Agristotle said:
I'm already "chilled" but drug induced hallucinations by people that have psychological issues is not "data" in the traditional use of the word. You're right, we disagree on that one.
But carry on......
BQRyno said:TCTTS said:
To be crystal clear, something along these lines is what I was waiting for, in terms of it being debunked. Whenever things like this have been debunked in the past, it's often due to some Googlable image element that someone IDs via reverse image search, everyone agrees it's a hoax, and that's that.
The difference here, however, is that this element apparently isn't Googlable, was apparently even in a zip file, and apparently originated from a physical CD from 1998. So the chances of this dude randomly happening to come across an exact match are pretty astronomical. Not impossible, of course, but it's not quite the same as how this usually goes down. Which potentially points to shenanigans of some sort, which makes me want to hit pause, just for a second, to see where this goes.
I'm gonna note how amazing it is that THIS is what you choose to be skeptical about…
redline248 said:
OK, here is the article I mentioned
https://observers.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20230323-mh370-why-these-two-videos-don-t-show-what-happened-to-the-lost-plane
The first part talks about a Google satellite photo that was claimed to show the plane near some US base.
The 2nd part is about the thermal video, which was apparently 2 videos? The first non thermal one (available by clicking a link) is clearly fake. There is some interesting stuff about the thermal one.
1st is been around for a while and was never considered credible before.Quote:
In the initial posts, the titles of both videos refer to "Airliner and UFOs". No mention of flight MH370 is made in the captions of either video.
One "expert" says this:Quote:
He even found a version of the video shared on Vimeo in August 2014 by a UFO enthusiast group. The description under the video describes it as "what the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 may have looked like" made by a "video editing enthusiast".
2nd, one of the "experts" says it originally was claimed to be from a satellite that didn't launch until after the flight. Then it was altered to be claimed as drone footage. The drones are said to have a much lower altitude ceiling than the fight.Quote:
I downloaded a higher resolution copy of the first video, alleged satellite footage with some letters and numbers half-visible on the screen. I'm pretty sure the video maker wanted viewers to believe the satellite is NROL-33 based on what we can see on that clip. I checked the letters/numbers using 10-20x magnification and went through the footage frame-by-frame.
NROL-33 is a real military satellite, but it was launched on May 22, 2014 later than MH370 incident. So if the video maker wanted viewers to believe the footage is from NROL-33 satellite, it can't be true.
I can't find any satellite imagery that would match what we see in the first clip. I think no satellite can't take that kind of images of an airplane. Shortly: I'm fairly certain this video is not from any satellite like the original video claims.
Later copies [...] have edited the clip so that the "mystery coordinates" are not visible. I found only one copy where the "coordinates" can be seen. Later copies don't talk about satellite video but suggest it's drone footage. That's not plausible either: MQ1-Predator max altitude is 25,000 ft, much lower than the MH370 cruising altitude.
I assume the reddit thread covers some of these items?
☀️In light of David Grusch's comments on agreements the US Government has with NHI, it's crucial to reexamine the statements made by Haim Eshed concerning the intergalactic federation. Haim Eshed's credibility stands strong.
— Dr.Disclosure89 (@Docneuroeo) August 18, 2023
Haim Eshed is an Israeli military figure and scientist… pic.twitter.com/aFYsp9WmYk
Gravity is a naturally occurring attraction between us and the earth. And like most natural attractions, it is magnified by the heavy presence of alcohol in one's blood.guadalupeag said:
Haha, proud I got a horse to water reference from you. So predicable. Honest question, in your own words; How does gravity work?
Have no idea? Does it exist? Watch the documentary yet? thirsty?guadalupeag said:
Haha, proud I got a horse to water reference from you. So predicable. Honest question, in your own words; How does gravity work?
Then again, what if he is correct? I know, I know...I've worn those shoes. It's difficult.G Martin 87 said:
The claim that the US government has signed "agreements" and "contracts" with a Galactic Federation that doesn't want to reveal itself is actually one of the nuttier claims out there. Who would enforce such a thing? Does this mean that the Galactic Federation uses a legal system similar to our own? What meaningful penalties are there for "breach of contract" by the Galactic Federation, for example? Would they even recognize the authority of a US court, civil or criminal? "Judgment for the plaintiff, the Galactic Federation owes us 100 quadrillion Galactic Credits."
I don't care how credible this guy used to be. 87 year old people often say stuff that is totally bonkers.
watty said:
These supposed videos of the Malaysia flight didn't even need "debunking" because we already have irrefutable proof that the plane didn't disappear into nothingness. Pieces of the plane literally exist and have been found and verified. So the video was debunked before it ever even came to light. It should have never been taken seriously by anyone. OF COURSE it was fake. It being fake was the only possibility. Like, the idea that that video just couldn't have been made by special effects is so laughable that I don't even know what to say anymore. The fact that otherwise rational people even left open a tiny window of possibility that those videos were real is very concerning to me.
Ghost of Bisbee said:
Spyderman/mckelvey's curse/Charles hickson knows/watty smoking some of that good ****
busted... ruwazimbabwe94 as well.. When I first got on TexAgs decades ago it was GigTheNation. Heck, I recall Hop (guy who does great work covering ag sports on the paysite) coming by my work place here on Agronomy Rd to shoot the you know what. Was wondering if I thought a A&M oriented website might work. We talked about this "young fella" named Billy Luicci who had just purchased David Walkers Maroon and White mailout. That was probably 1993 or so.Ghost of Bisbee said:
Spyderman/mckelvey's curse/Charles hickson knows/watty smoking some of that good ****
It's not. I'll try to stretch the effect to get an identical match. Until we'll get something more than just a pretty similar but far from near identical I'd wait for the confirmation. pic.twitter.com/0XKgwXA35q
— Flowwweb (@TheFlowwweb) August 20, 2023
Turns out all naturally occurring shockwaves create a positive match with the portal effect. pic.twitter.com/mzj262aBic
— Flowwweb (@TheFlowwweb) August 20, 2023
Turns out all thermal shockwaves follow a pretty similar pattern.
— King Milkfart (@King_Milkfart) August 20, 2023
Even on the stellar scale.
Oops lmao #MH370 #itsfuckingreal #ufotwitter pic.twitter.com/C1WpfzglF5
SOURCE: https://t.co/aQ7swNLhZm
— 💭 think tank (@528vibes) August 20, 2023
Man, if you only knew what I do at a local lab...Ghost of Bisbee said:
Can you share some of that ganja?
Aztec1948 said:Man, if you only knew what I do at a local lab...Ghost of Bisbee said:
Can you share some of that ganja?
Were you able to watch that documentary? I'm curious if anybody watched it? In entirety..
At some point many will..sometimes the horses do get thirsty..BQRyno said:Aztec1948 said:Man, if you only knew what I do at a local lab...Ghost of Bisbee said:
Can you share some of that ganja?
Were you able to watch that documentary? I'm curious if anybody watched it? In entirety..
I'll be the one to break it to you: No one is going to watch that "documentary."
Aztec1948 said:Man, if you only knew what I do at a local lab...Ghost of Bisbee said:
Can you share some of that ganja?
Were you able to watch that documentary? I'm curious if anybody watched it? In entirety..
It's not being grown. I'm just being a good soldier. I'm told it is a very good "product". It's been mentioned here on TA before.Rocagnante said:Aztec1948 said:Man, if you only knew what I do at a local lab...Ghost of Bisbee said:
Can you share some of that ganja?
Were you able to watch that documentary? I'm curious if anybody watched it? In entirety..
I'll host a viewing party if you provide some of your lab grown stuff….
Edited to clarify watching the videos, not attempt remote viewing. Unless it's some really good ****…