*** UAP THREAD ***

445,112 Views | 5296 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by Redstone
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Redstone said:

Someone go ahead and deny that objects have defied the known laws of gravity. On film. Multiple times. With military testimonies.

That's the point of the thread. Something is going on.


Bingo.

On film, radar, and satellite. This has been confirmed by multiple government officials, across multiple government sectors, across both political parties. In fact, this is the *one* subject that our elected leaders actually seem to agree on.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Redstone said:

Someone go ahead and deny that objects have defied the known laws of gravity. On film. Multiple times. With military testimonies.

That's the point of the thread. Something is going on.


Bingo.

On film, radar, and satellite. This has been confirmed by multiple government officials, across multiple government sectors, across both political parties. In fact, this is the *one* subject that our elected leaders actually seem to agree on.
OMG, I'm not sure I fully realized that government officials have confirmed videos!

Wow! This changes sooo much!
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Remember that DM you sent me not too long ago, saying to never take anything you say seriously? I've been doing that more and more lately, especially in this instance.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doesn't that make everything so much better?
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rocagnante said:

I'm talking about the objects our Navy pilots purportedly see on a regular basis. If true, then they could probably shoot our planes out of the sky at will if they turn hostile.

Either they're lying or UAPs are real objects. At this point I'm still leaning towards lying until better visual evidence is presented and confirmed and more people still acting in official government/contractor capacities come forward.
We know that UAPs are real, just like UFOs are/were always real. the key word in each is "unidentified". All both of those terms mean is "we saw something in the air that we don't recognize." There's nothing else implied. Hell, I saw the bushes move behind my house the other day, that was a legitimate UWO, "Unidentified Walking Object." Which sounds really impressive and mysterious, but it was almost certainly a dog or a cat.



"Hey, what's that?"

"I don't know."

That's a legitimate UAP/UFO sighting. There's never been a time in history when that wasn't happening.



A cloud can be a UAP/UFO, a floating clear plastic bag can be a UAP/UFO, a bird can be a UAP/UFO if you can't tell what those examples are in certain conditions.

It frustrated me even as a child when people (not saying you) would use UFO and "alien flying saucer" interchangeably. And for most that's still what they're strongly implying with UAP. It was so strong that's why they replaced the term. "UFO" became embarrassing.

Ultimately, I guess it's also frustrating to be asked to accept that the all-powerful government (mind you, not just ours but practically every single government on the planet would have to be in on it) has been orchestrating a cover-up of this for 100 or more years, but now we're asked to accept that our primary source of evidence of everything being exposed is from intelligence agency whistleblowers (from the government), a few seemingly interested congressmen (from the government), and military pilots (from the government).

So the government has supposedly been covering this up the whole time, but at the same time now all our best evidence that something otherworldly is going on is that people at all levels of government publicly say they don't know what's going on, either.


Honestly, what do the people on here who are convinced that non-human intelligence is interacting with us really expect to happen at the congressional hearings (assuming that happens)? Anything at all? I see some people online have a "Just you wait and see, you won't be able to deny it when it's all presented in public!" attitude like they expect someone is going to park a big truck with spaceships and alien bodies outside the front door of Congress for everybody to dig through. And hey, that would be awesome! I suspect though that the best we'll get, if it even happens, are a few unknown "whistleblowers" to just repeat "I can't discuss that" over and over.

Real whistleblowers end up like Snowden in exile or prison, but for some reason whistleblowers with world-altering "biggest story in human history by far" alien or interdimensional-being claims (because that's what he says) end up getting permission from the government to go on TV and talk about it without risk.
















Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let's state again the stone cold fact that all Christians are obligated to believe "non-human intelligences have interacted with humans."

From this baseline premise, for these billion + people, it is not ridiculous to be open to the more materialist evidence on this thread - especially the first-hand testimony, eyewitness accounts, and circumstantial evidence similar across time and environment.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Joes said:

TCTTS said:

howitzercannon said:

The absolute best evidence that anyone can find or produce is blurry pictures. Do you know why? Because as soon as we get clearer pictures, we know what it is and isn't a story. So we never keep track of all the times a blurry picture we thought was an alien space craft but once clarity hit it wasn't worth keeping record of.


When there are phones and cameras and satellites covering the entire globe with competing governments that don't like each other, and none of them are saying one thing or another for UFOs….come on.

We get the random 1 time shot of meteors hitting on dash cams in russia, police body cams capturing cool aerial phenomena. And we can't get a single clean pic of a UAP? Is it because once identified 10 out of 10 times we know what it is?

So we all sit around and go, "hey! What's that? I don't know, must be aliens." And move one with our day without any further thoughts it seems.

Eh, you're conveniently limiting evidence to only photos and videos, when circumstantial evidence is admissible in court. And on that front, there is a mountain of it when it comes to witness testimony from highly credible sources, to the point where we have to face one of three realities...

1) Some of the most credible officials and pilots in our government are being duped by one of the most complex psyops in all of human history, lasting decades, one that involves man-made technology generations ahead of where we are publicly.

2) Some of the most credible officials and pilots in our government are suffering from mass psychosis, a form of mass psychosis that somehow has the ability to either directly affect satellite and radar data, or at least our perception of satellite and radar data.

- or -

3) The phenomenon is real, i.e. we're dealing non-human intelligence, either extra-terrestrial, ultra-terrestrial, or inter-dimensional in nature (if not all three).

Either way, it's one of the biggest stories in human history.

Personally, at this point, frankly, I chalk up reactions like this as nothing more than the death rattle of skepticism. I get that this is going to be hard for a number of people to swallow, and I get the gut reaction to dismiss it outright. But if you truly look into what's happening right now, and truly consider who is saying and confirming what, there is absolutely no denying that this is an incredibly massive story, one that I personally believe is the third option above, based on myriad circumstantial and corroborating evidence.

As for the whole photo/video thing, when was the last time you captured on your phone a car wreck happening in real time? And even if you did, these "car wrecks" are thousands of feet away, if not hundreds of miles and away. So of course the footage is going to be blurry.

That said, there are dozens of credible videos out there, like the below, that are far more than just blurry dots in the sky...



What? There are approximately 10 billion hours' worth of unmistakable examples of this in high definition without any ambiguity at all because they're actually real. The dudes in Las Vegas recently said that 10 foot aliens landed in their backyard, not hundreds of miles away. Fine, let's see them.


Forget the videos. I only showed the two I did in order to present examples that were more than just blurry dots in the sky. Are they authentic? I have no idea, and it's ultimately beside the larger point.

Also, no one believes the Las Vegas aliens-in-the-backyard thing. That crap was clearly a hoax. To keep bringing it up as if it's some kind of gotcha is disingenuous.

Again, focus on the incredibly compelling circumstantial evidence that has been outlined in this thread.
I appreciate your response, honestly I do, and I have no desire to fight with anyone, and if I saw any evidence that seemed compelling to me I would definitely be unbelievably interested and excited too. So I certainly have no predisposition to want, or not want, there to be anything to this. But I admit I am just genuinely baffled at people still taking this seriously decade after decade without one good picture. But I'll watch along and see what happens.

I just feel like we're being setup for "It's all coming to light finally!" followed quickly after by "Well, what did you expect, of course they're never going to admit anything so let's just keep telling more stories."

I actually hope I'm wrong.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

Real whistleblowers end up like Snowden in exile or prison, but for some reason whistleblowers with world-altering "biggest story in human history by far" alien or interdimensional-being claims (because that's what he says) end up getting permission from the government to go on TV and talk about it without risk.

This right here tells me you haven't been really been paying attention. And that's fine. No one is saying you have to.

It's when you start going on and on about this stuff, in the manner you are, when you're going to get pushback.

Because if you've been reading this thread at all, or paying attention to the news, you'd know that the Senate Intelligence Committee literally just passed - for 2023 - the Whistleblower Protection Act. Meaning, they've been hearing so much compelling testimony from officials, pilots, etc, that they finally passed an unprecedented law granting full immunity to anyone involved with potential UAP programs - dealing with crash retrievals, reverse engineering, and the like - who comes forward and testifies as to the existence of these programs. This went into effect this past January, and multiple Senators, along with other government officials, are now on the record as saying this act led *directly* to multiple individuals - with first hand knowledge of/experience with these UAP programs - coming forward and presenting not only evidence, but proof of their claims.

To the point where the Intelligence Community Inspector General has labeled the claims "urgent and credible."

This is something that is *actually* happening.

And now that these whistleblowers are coming forward, the Senate Intelligence Committee is passing yet another law - for 2024 - requiring these UAP programs to come forward with everything they have/know.

In other words, what the whistleblowers have come forward with is of *such* credibility, and *so* compelling to the Senate Intelligence Committee, that they're making it law that all of this finally come out of the shadows.

I'm sorry, but there is absolutely NO WAY any of this would be happening based simply on hunches and larks.

And again, this is all here in this thread.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redstone said:

Someone go ahead and deny that objects have defied the known laws of gravity. On film. Multiple times. With military testimonies.

That's the point of the thread. Something is going on.

What exactly does this mean? I hear it all the time and it sounds like absolute nonsense. It just sounds more mysterious than "it appears to be more advanced our known technology." That, I can believe.

Haven't people ever heard of "Any Sufficiently Advanced Technology is Indistinguishable from Magic"?


Even if they're genuine alien craft then they're still not defying physical laws any more than a helicopter hovering in the air or a 100,000 ton metal ship floating in water would appear to not make any sense to a caveman.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:


Quote:

Real whistleblowers end up like Snowden in exile or prison, but for some reason whistleblowers with world-altering "biggest story in human history by far" alien or interdimensional-being claims (because that's what he says) end up getting permission from the government to go on TV and talk about it without risk.

This right here tells me you haven't been really been paying attention. And that's fine. No one is saying you have to.

It's when you start going on and on about this stuff, in the manner you are, when you're going to get pushback.

Because if you've been reading this thread at all, or paying attention to the news, you'd know that the Senate Intelligence Committee literally just passed - for 2023 - the Whistleblower Protection Act. Meaning, they've been hearing so much compelling testimony from officials, pilots, etc, that they finally passed an unprecedented law granting full immunity to anyone involved with potential UAP programs - dealing with crash retrievals, reverse engineering, and the like - who comes forward and testifies as to the existence of these programs. This went into effect this past January, and multiple Senators, along with other government officials, are now on the record as saying this act led *directly* to multiple individuals - with first hand knowledge of/experience with these UAP programs - coming forward and presenting not only evidence, but proof of their claims.

To the point where the Intelligence Community Inspector General has labeled the claims "urgent and credible."

This is something that is *actually* happening.

And now that these whistleblowers are coming forward, the Senate Intelligence Committee is passing yet another law - for 2024 - requiring these UAP programs to come forward with everything they have/know.

In other words, what the whistleblowers have come forward with is of *such* credibility, and *so* compelling to the Senate Intelligence Committee, that they're making it law that all of this finally come out of the shadows.

I'm sorry, but there is absolutely NO WAY any of this would be happening based simply on hunches and larks.

And again, this is all here in this thread.
Alright, then I'll patiently wait for the big reveal.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Joes said:

Redstone said:

Someone go ahead and deny that objects have defied the known laws of gravity. On film. Multiple times. With military testimonies.

That's the point of the thread. Something is going on.

What exactly does this mean? I hear it all the time and it sounds like absolute nonsense. It just sounds more mysterious than "it appears to be more advanced our known technology." That, I can believe.

Haven't people ever heard of "Any Sufficiently Advanced Technology is Indistinguishable from Magic"?


Even if they're genuine alien craft then they're still not defying physical laws any more than a helicopter hovering in the air or a 100,000 ton metal ship floating in water would appear to not make any sense to a caveman.

Notice how he said "known" laws of physics. For instance, our current laws of physics simply do not allow for an object to move from 80,000 feet to just above the surface of the ocean, in less than a second, and stop on a dime while doing so. Yet in the now-infamous 2004 Nimitz encounter, this is exactly what multiple Top Gun pilots claim happened, and what the radar technicians on the nearby aircraft carrier attest to while witnessing the movements of a white "tic tac" shaped object the size of a buss, with no visible means of propulsion, that their aircraft interacted with. For all intents and purposes, that was an "impossible" maneuver. Yet military pilot after military pilot have officially come forward with stories just like this, sometimes backed up with evidence, where in unidentified craft are pulling maneuvers that no man-made craft are capable of pulling.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Joes said:

Redstone said:

Someone go ahead and deny that objects have defied the known laws of gravity. On film. Multiple times. With military testimonies.

That's the point of the thread. Something is going on.

What exactly does this mean? I hear it all the time and it sounds like absolute nonsense. It just sounds more mysterious than "it appears to be more advanced our known technology." That, I can believe.

Haven't people ever heard of "Any Sufficiently Advanced Technology is Indistinguishable from Magic"?


Even if they're genuine alien craft then they're still not defying physical laws any more than a helicopter hovering in the air or a 100,000 ton metal ship floating in water would appear to not make any sense to a caveman.

Notice how he said "known" laws of physics. For instance, our current laws of physics simply do not allow for an object to move from 80,000 feet to just above the surface of the ocean, in less than a second, and stop on a dime while doing so. Yet in the now-infamous 2004 Nimitz encounter, this is exactly what multiple Top Gun pilots claim happened, and what the radar technicians on the nearby aircraft carrier attest to while witnessing the movements of a white "tic tac" shaped object the size of a buss, with no visible means of propulsion, that their aircraft interacted with. For all intents and purposes, that was an "impossible" maneuver. Yet military pilot after military pilot have officially come forward with stories just like this, sometimes backed up with evidence, where in unidentified craft are pulling maneuvers that no man-made craft are capable of pulling.
Ok, I genuinely appreciate your responses.

Look, the bottom line is that if what you say is true then there shouldn't be any ambiguity very very soon. The whole argument over what distant objects appear to be doing in vague fuzzy video is totally moot now because Grusch, whom you described as "Highly reputable government officials like David Grusch" and "Grusch, especially, simply doesn't come forward, under oath, risking fines and prison, literally challenging the Senate to look into his claims, without knowing/seeing *something* compelling first" has made the following quotes:


Ross Coulthart: We have spacecraft from another species?

David Grusch: We do, yeah.

Ross Coulthart: How many?

David Grusch: Quite a number!

And:


Ross Coulthart: You've said that we have, the United States has, spacecraft, intact craft. Do we have bodies? Do we have species of non-human?

David Grusch: Well, naturally, when you recover something that's either landed or crashed, sometimes you encounter dead pilots and believe it or not, as fantastical as that sounds, it's true.

And:

Ross Coulthart: And at the centre of it all, the crash retrieval program the government has never publicly acknowledged. A program, Grusch says, that's included at least one private aerospace company that is storing alien craft. Is that true?

David Grusch: That is how a lot of these relationships are. Well, I don't want to name the specific companies and government elements, but overall, you know, the government has been the custodian of a lot of this, right


So he claims multiple times after being challenged that we have multiple intact craft in our possession, plus bodies. And now you're adamant that they have protection to be forthcoming because of the changes in the laws.

If these serious "whistleblowers" get in front of Congress and try the "look at this other strange fuzzy video a pilot took 10 years ago" or "let me tell you about someone else who saw a document" methods when unambiguous claims have been made by "highly reputable" people that we have ships and occupant bodies in our possession, then I hope we never hear about any of this again. Don't tell me "We can't tell what these are from the videos" at the same time they claim to have many of them in their hands. That makes no sense.

Genuine disclosure at this point given the claims made and the freedom to come forth means no less than publicly presenting the ships and bodies physically, and allowing others to study them, period. Quite a threshold.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm genuinely glad to see you digging in to this stuff.

Rest assured, the evidence/proof being brought forward by the whistleblowers is reportedly far more than just fuzzy videos. By all accounts, it's documented proof of the existence of these UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering programs, in the form paperwork, photos, and maybe even video. Either way, it's documentation that has been corroborated and verified, enough so to spring the Senate Intelligence Committee into unprecedented action.

The trick will be eventually making all of this stuff public.

Because the law being passed for 2024 requires these programs to divulge their existence, and the tech in their possession, to AARO, not to the public. So there *is* a scenario where even if this stuff makes its way to AARO, it could *still* be deemed too sensitive/classified to make its way to the public. That said, too many officials, Senators, etc will be aware at that point, and there's absolutely no way the news doesn't leak. And when the news leaks, photos and video will soon follow, hopefully culminating in some kind of official announcement.

If I had to guess, it could go something like this...

- Hearings starting either later this summer or into the fall (it's sounding like two or three total). Featuring bold claims from multiple people like Grusch, along with other officials, that make world-wide headline news, but still no verifiable proof, since it all still remains technically classified.

- But then, heading toward July 1, 2024, more and more info starts leaking, and finally, perhaps a year or so from now, some video leaks that is absolutely beyond convincing. Close up of a craft defying the knows laws of physics. Something along those lines.

- With the damn gushing, on the verge of breaking, at some point during the second half of next year, the government is then finally forced to admit to the reality of UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering programs.

To me, that's the fastest this could all move. In reality, it'll of course probably take a longer, though. One X factor is next year's presidential election, which might affect the timing of some of this as well. But if come the end of, say, 2025, we still aren't much farther along than we are now, then yeah, even I'll start to join the skeptics.
Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My scenario:
The Spooks pull the senators/congressmen aside and tell them the fate of the nation is at stake, that absolute secrecy is essential because we are in a race with the Chinese to reverse engineer the tech.

The key whistle blowers are bought/threatened/blackmailed or worse into altering/withdrawing their testimonies.

All the relevant military/industrial types point the finger at someone else and lawyer up.......
........and it all stays buried.

I sincerely hope you are right and I am wrong.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:


Quote:

Real whistleblowers end up like Snowden in exile or prison, but for some reason whistleblowers with world-altering "biggest story in human history by far" alien or interdimensional-being claims (because that's what he says) end up getting permission from the government to go on TV and talk about it without risk.

This right here tells me you haven't been really been paying attention. And that's fine. No one is saying you have to.

It's when you start going on and on about this stuff, in the manner you are, when you're going to get pushback.

Because if you've been reading this thread at all, or paying attention to the news, you'd know that the Senate Intelligence Committee literally just passed - for 2023 - the Whistleblower Protection Act. Meaning, they've been hearing so much compelling testimony from officials, pilots, etc, that they finally passed an unprecedented law granting full immunity to anyone involved with potential UAP programs - dealing with crash retrievals, reverse engineering, and the like - who comes forward and testifies as to the existence of these programs. This went into effect this past January, and multiple Senators, along with other government officials, are now on the record as saying this act led *directly* to multiple individuals - with first hand knowledge of/experience with these UAP programs - coming forward and presenting not only evidence, but proof of their claims.

To the point where the Intelligence Community Inspector General has labeled the claims "urgent and credible."

This is something that is *actually* happening.

And now that these whistleblowers are coming forward, the Senate Intelligence Committee is passing yet another law - for 2024 - requiring these UAP programs to come forward with everything they have/know.

In other words, what the whistleblowers have come forward with is of *such* credibility, and *so* compelling to the Senate Intelligence Committee, that they're making it law that all of this finally come out of the shadows.

I'm sorry, but there is absolutely NO WAY any of this would be happening based simply on hunches and larks.

And again, this is all here in this thread.
Out of respect I went back and read the whole thread and admittedly I didn't gain anything from it except more questions. Again, I don't see any harm in having enthusiasm about this stuff or wanting things in life to be more interesting, hell I've always loved science fiction and fantasy stories, and it's fun to speculate. But there is simply nothing of any consequence to support any of these claims in my opinion. And the more people there are on the planet with more available technology than ever it all seems even less credible as time goes by. For the same reason that people don't claim to see mermaids anymore. Those posted videos clearly exist, and I'm convinced that they're a combination of fakes, glitches, and high-tech human equipment.

When I see questions on here like (and I'm not saying it was you) "Just curious what it would take for you to believe?", well, to a rational person this is just non-sensical. Reality doesn't require any belief. Have you ever asked someone if they believe in dogs? They'd just go "Uh, what the heck are you talking about?" It makes no sense. We know they exist because it's self-evident and undeniable. In fact, it would be bizarre to say you believe in dogs. Belief is simply not a factor unless you're talking about religion/faith.

And that has been transparent to me my whole life, most people, on the right and the left, seem to require a sense that someone or something all-powerful is in control. Lots of people see it in one god or another, some people desire to see it in all-powerful government (Man, the number of times in my life I've heard people claim that nothing happens without the government knowing about it..), some people choose to see it in Gaia/Mother Nature, and some people see it in impossibly advanced aliens babysitting us, just out of reach. All the stories are the same, claims of secrets in the shadows and such. Borne out of emotional desperation for us not to be just some random collection of biological material clinging to a stupid rock floating through empty space.

It's all so consistent but just in different forms, this weird need people have to be comforted that some all-knowing entity, in whatever form they're comfortable with, is running everything behind the scenes and is in control. It's not.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

My scenario:
The Spooks pull the senators/congressmen aside and tell them the fate of the nation is at stake, that absolute secrecy is essential because we are in a race with the Chinese to reverse engineer the tech.

The key whistle blowers are bought/threatened/blackmailed or worse into altering/withdrawing their testimonies.

All the relevant military/industrial types point the finger at someone else and lawyer up.......
........and it all stays buried.

I sincerely hope you are right and I am wrong.

That's not at all out of the realm of possibility.

If it's any consolation, Grusch has *already* been harassed and threatened, and it sounds like others have as well... and yet, as of now, they all still plan to testify publicly.

I think the difference this time is that those pulling the strings behind the scenes are no longer a monolith. Instead, they're split. Some want disclosure, others want to keep the status quo, and it's that fissure that's allowing these leaks to slip through, their overall grip to loosen, and thus those who are fed up with the secrecy to feel emboldened enough to come forward, despite the risks.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

I'm genuinely glad to see you digging in to this stuff.

Rest assured, the evidence/proof being brought forward by the whistleblowers is reportedly far more than just fuzzy videos. By all accounts, it's documented proof of the existence of these UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering programs, in the form paperwork, photos, and maybe even video. Either way, it's documentation that has been corroborated and verified, enough so to spring the Senate Intelligence Committee into unprecedented action.

The trick will be eventually making all of this stuff public.

Because the law being passed for 2024 requires these programs to divulge their existence, and the tech in their possession, to AARO, not to the public. So there *is* a scenario where even if this stuff makes its way to AARO, it could *still* be deemed too sensitive/classified to make its way to the public. That said, too many officials, Senators, etc will be aware at that point, and there's absolutely no way the news doesn't leak. And when the news leaks, photos and video will soon follow, hopefully culminating in some kind of official announcement.

If I had to guess, it could go something like this...

- Hearings starting either later this summer or into the fall (it's sounding like two or three total). Featuring bold claims from multiple people like Grusch, along with other officials, that make world-wide headline news, but still no verifiable proof, since it all still remains technically classified.

- But then, heading toward July 1, 2024, more and more info starts leaking, and finally, perhaps a year or so from now, some video leaks that is absolutely beyond convincing. Close up of a craft defying the knows laws of physics. Something along those lines.

- With the damn gushing, on the verge of breaking, at some point during the second half of next year, the government is then finally forced to admit to the reality of UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering programs.

To me, that's the fastest this could all move. In reality, it'll of course probably take a longer, though. One X factor is next year's presidential election, which might affect the timing of some of this as well. But if come the end of, say, 2025, we still aren't much farther along than we are now, then yeah, even I'll start to join the skeptics.
I really appreciate your time and I look forward to seeing how things play out.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As with Scientology and various abusive cults ….

a cover-up like Roswell (which was 100% a lying cover-up, even if you do not believe in UAPs, as S. Friedman forced USAF to admit) cannot well survive the Internet. People talking en mass. Details and facts that be checked.

It's how I could say, being informed in such a manner, that Marcel there in NM was both a problematic witness with a history of exaggeration and also worth listening to - we can cross-reference.

The Internet both allows hoaxes / misinfo. to spread AND is forcing disclosure. It's happening right before our eyes, right now.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I will watch and see but I fully expect a Sally-like result.

Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Promised before the end of this month. At least we won't have to wait long to **** or get off the pot.

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Things are certainly heating up in more ways than one.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And then there's this...

Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:


Yeah, that Ross guy is not the impartial mainstream journalist they made him out to be for the Grusch interview. He's been on countless woowoo UFO youtube shows in recent weeks and I've watched some to gauge him, each one is nuttier than the last. And surprise surprise, he's also been on the "I have UFO books to sell you and I'm available to speak for pay on the UFO tours" parade.

In 2021, Coulthart authored a UFO-themed book titled In Plain Sight: An Investigation into UFOs and Impossible Science. Jason Colavito reviewed Coulthart's book, saying it was "less a serious analysis and more of a book report on the last works of the leaders of the faith. It also serves as an application for Coulthart to join Leslie Kean and George Knapp on the lucrative UFO speakers' circuit,

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Joes said:

TCTTS said:


Yeah, that Ross guy is not the impartial mainstream journalist they made him out to be for the Grusch interview. He's been on countless woowoo UFO youtube shows in recent weeks and I've watched some to gauge him, each one is nuttier than the last. And surprise surprise, he's also been on the "I have UFO books to sell you and I'm available to speak for pay on the UFO tours" parade.

In 2021, Coulthart authored a UFO-themed book titled In Plain Sight: An Investigation into UFOs and Impossible Science. Jason Colavito reviewed Coulthart's book, saying it was "less a serious analysis and more of a book report on the last works of the leaders of the faith. It also serves as an application for Coulthart to join Leslie Kean and George Knapp on the lucrative UFO speakers' circuit,

Coulthart is about as pragmatic and level-headed as they come. To the point where I seriously could not have hoped for a better journalist to be tackling this subject right now.

Also, show me where "they" (whoever they are) made him out to be an "impartial mainstream journalist"? When he's highly and proudly interested in the subject, has become one of the leading media experts in the field, and yes, even wrote a book (and has a podcast) on the subject.

Doesn't that make him *better* equipped to be tackling this subject - someone who knows the history, context, facts, figures, etc, and has all the government/military connections he does? Why would you want just some random journalist interviewing someone like Grusch at this stage? Grusch is about to be grilled publicly by Congress, and that will be more than enough in that regard.

Also, as I've said before, it's just so weird to me when people criticize those like Coulthart for needing to make money to support themselves while covering this subject. What else do you expect him to do? Also, it's not like it's some random, cheesy, UFO book. It's literally one of the best books ever written on the subject. In the interview I linked to just the other day Coulthart even addressed this, saying he makes NOTHING from all of these appearances he does, all the emails he answers, etc. So again, what else is he supposed to do?

Either way, I guess I just don't understand the point of you continuing to double down and further dig yourself in a hole with all of this.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:




I know where I'm placing my bet.
Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm really surprised Rubio is this far out on this ledge. He can't make this happen by himself. What's his endgame when the sources dry up and we get an official non answer?
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:


Or, and stay with me here, the gov is developing top secret stuff and this is cover to try and keep it secret as long as possible
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agristotle said:

I'm really surprised Rubio is this far out on this ledge. He can't make this happen by himself. What's his endgame when the sources dry up and we get an official non answer?
$$$
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

TCTTS said:


Or, and stay with me here, the gov is developing top secret stuff and this is cover to try and keep it secret as long as possible

I don't see how that would make much sense, but I could be missing something.

Of course the government is developing top secret tech, just as they always have. But why would they then start covertly spreading rumors designed to make their way to Grusch and the like, that it's "alien" tech (backed with all kinds authentic paperwork and photos and videos and everything else Grusch and others have seen), which then in turn triggers representatives to start sniffing around and raising hell? Why not just continue developing top secret stuff in the dark, without causing a sh*t storm?

And yes, there's the notion that we *want* our adversaries to *think* we have alien tech, but that doesn't seem worth it in this particular instance. Or, rather, it seems they'd go about something like that by different means.

I don't know, it's just that the insanely complex level of deception and coordination that would have to go into tricking the Grusches of the world, across decades, to the point where they believe all that they believe, would have to be nearly as elaborate and complex as any potential disclosure effort. Especially when Grusch claims that people he's known and trusted for 20 years are some of the ones telling him this stuff, and providing him proof. So did the government hire these people 20 years ago to befriend Grusch, gain his trust, all just to eventually leak false "alien" info to him in the 2020s? All so our adversaries *think* we might have alien tech?
Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So Rubio is going to EITHER (1) produce alien technology or (2) unilaterally declare a bunch of high level government officials crazy/liars.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agristotle said:

So Rubio is going to EITHER (1) produce alien technology or (2) unilaterally declare a bunch of high level government officials crazy/liars.
To be fair, the bolded part happens on a daily basis from any politician with a microphone in their face. Not sure it would hurt a congresscritter to call out other govt workers as crazy liars.

I'd be more scared of the one that doesn't say I'm crazy

Not attempting to derail so a fun thought I've always had that touches on the earlier topic of "physics as we know it" or "science as we know it".

I undrestand a scientist using the foundations of science as we know them to be true to base any and all theories. Making up science to go along with theories would historically not get you any serious consideration.

I've always looked at the universe as "there's a lot more we don't know than we do know" and it isn't crazy to think other civilizations use resources in competely different methods than we know or would consider. Michael Crichton said it perfectly in one of his books, and I'm paraphrasing "An alien could inhale oxygen and exhale hydrochloric acid".
Staff - take out the trash.
Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've literally used the phrase, "what we don't know is greater than what we know" multiple times on multiple threads.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some places are "thin." I believe testimonies such as these are connected. Our material dimension is but one.

1. https://theunexplained.tv/episodes/edition-738-james-szubski

2.
First Page Last Page
Page 14 of 152
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.