Entertainment
Sponsored by

*** UAP THREAD ***

612,589 Views | 6227 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Redstone
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bret Baier believes.

G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Redstone said:

Bret Baier believes.


To be fair, Bret didn't say he believes or doesn't believe. He's doing a good job being an impartial journalist here.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's working with - journalist wise - a pro Disclosure group within military intel.

There are 4 "nodes" here
- CIA
- Navy (retrieve)
- DOE (retrieve / move under nuclear rules / have their own classified status systems)
- contractors (hold, build, keep away FOIA)

Permanent bureaucracy within them less able now to disregard the political appointees. Because of Internet in no small part.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now some (ie Jason Jorjani) are saying the anti- Venezuelan / Colombian sabre rattling is motivated by Trump being mad he was denied full access to legacy programs, and cutting off major CIA black box funding.

What we can say for sure is that according to Sydney Schanberg, one of the most prominent and important journalists of our time, that sort of drug running evil has definitely occurred, and globally.
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yesterday's Rubio interview doesn't point to imminent 'disclosure' IMO.

Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Trump was inclined to make some formal Disclosure statement, he would keep it in his pocket until he wanted to change the news cycle
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
benchmark said:

Yesterday's Rubio interview doesn't point to imminent 'disclosure' IMO.


Great response from Rubio. I agree! There are 3 possibilities: government/military officials are either (1) lying, (2) crazy, or (3) telling the truth. None of those options are good.
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

Great response from Rubio. I agree! There are 3 possibilities: government/military officials are either (1) lying, (2) crazy, or (3) telling the truth. None of those options are good.

There's actually 4 possibilities .... (3) perceived truth and (4) verifiable truth. Perceived truth is subjective (grounded on one's belief). Verifiable truth is objective (grounded on evidence).
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Missed this a few months ago. Extremely important larger points here:

- Truth, lies, compromise (including very evil types) is mixed in, and frequently. Another data point of Disclosure (already here, IMO) is inevitable.

- This is a people situation. Meaning, people both lie and tell the truth. Including for petty high school reasons.

- GOOD ACTORS, CONSISTENTLY IMO -
Best "filters" of info:

Gerb (wow is he solid)
Grusch
Luna, Burchett, Burlison

Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In this link, a single page PDF -

a concise summary, Old and New Testament, of the times where preternatural (angelic entities, not necessarily "angels," a narrow term that denotes function) interacted - materially - with humanity.
(1 Enoch excluded, although its referenced in the NT)

https://jumpshare.com/share/31LQ6HGo2FjMAXh0ISo3

Again, this matters because Christians are OBLIGATED to believe that non-human intelligences EXIST, and CAN interact with humanity.

Doesn't mean there are aliens, but believers are more than halfway there.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:


It would go over about as well as Trump saying that pregnant women should avoid Tylenol, a statement that is controversial only because Trump said it. That warning has been on Tylenol bottles for a very long time. There would be 50% of the country at least that would dismiss it out of hand because Trump. Everyone knows this, including Trump himself.
TKEAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep. Sadly.

Unless it smacks a portion of the population in the face physically, or takes away something they can't live without, it would be yesterday's news by 5PM.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Area 52 channel performs a useful service: comparing and analyzing the consistencies of first-hand accounts across decades.

This hour video is a good example. The inconsistencies in his two testimonies over a long period are minor, AND they conform with others …. most notably, Bob Lazar.

I also am very sympathetic to one of the earth's functions being a hydrogen gas station.

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very curious. 2025 is drawing to a close very rapidly. Strange burst of confidence.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

Very curious. 2025 is drawing to a close very rapidly. Strange burst of confidence.
Never mind. The Polymarket About statement explains what the prop really is.




TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very well deserved. We need a DVD release with extensive extras.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Oscar-Contending Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Doc 'The Age Of Disclosure' Becomes VOD Phenomenon, Outperforming 'One Battle After Another' & More
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"All will be disclosed."

The first piece of marketing for Spielberg's untitled UFO blockbuster, which is looking more and more now like it'll be titled Disclosure.

Trailer any day now.

Canyon Lake Agbu94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I really wanted this documentary to be a true stepping stone to disclosure, but when the majority of the movie is Luis Elizondo broodingly staring across the Potomac, or footage of David Grusch looking like the Sandy Hook shooter as he testifies, you realize that this ain't it.

I thought that the JRE episode on the video was better than this actual movie and I halfway expected Giorgio A. Tsoukalos to show up on the screen and proclaim that it was aliens at any moment. Damn that was disappointing.
abram97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I love the Bob Lazar episode on JRE. That was cool. Shawn Ryan also has some good ones. I kinda agree and I was expecting a bit more. Perhaps because I don't necessarily need to hear people in authority talk about the probability of aliens - I am already there. Tell me some juicy personal stories!
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I heard it described as a good, well put together primer/intro to those who may not pay attention to such things.
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I believe Lazar has been fully vindicated, and I've followed the back and forth there for 20 years.

Reminder that Age of Disclosure COULD NOT go further because:

- FedGov and adjacent has actively participated in very significant evils, as bad or worse as the CIA's IMO proven evil of a type of blackmail

- Therefore, "further" requires - probably - mass and comprehensive amnesty

- Religion COULD be decimated as a glue of social cohesion, and it's too bad my opinions are not prevalent on that question

- Admittance of trillions - ie Rumsfeld on Sept. 10, 2001 - disappeared to …. well, we know

- The "need" to detail, subsequently, that there are different species and some hate each other violently

- Quantum physics, zero point energy….. imagine the economic and social impact here (including why crafts are "blurry" / "invisible"
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The reason Elizando and Grusch are centered is because, relatively speaking, their creditability is significantly higher than the worlds of Kirkpatrick, Greer, Barber (sadly there) - I'll detail that if asked, but this is definitely the case
Aggie Athlete Involved
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What's the latest with Barber? Guess he still hasn't caught a uap?
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He was called out or called back. Gerb may drop some details, but probably not because Barber is legit.

This is once again the both / and reality, not the either / or. Meaning - aliens, angels and demons, our tech, lies, partial lies, China / Russia ….. YES.

Here, IMO Barber is who he says, impressive, had a profound experience, wants to do good…..AND he can get got.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBQ-00 said:

I heard it described as a good, well put together primer/intro to those who may not pay attention to such things.


Exactly. The Age of Disclosure is to meant prime the general public - the "normies" - not people like us who frequent threads like this.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Exactly one year ago we were in the middle of the "drones" mystery.

This has been Memory-Holed, and I noticed that happening a year ago in real time. Alberino, who has excellent Congressional sources, said in his must watch Age of Disclosure review on YT that SOME of them were related to Chinese tech.

So, back to BOTH / AND. This really is important as a conceptual framework. ie ….
Preternatural / Alien / Mystery, even to military? Yes. Our tech? Yes. China being jerks? Yes. Contractor tests? Yes.

And if anyone thinks the "drones" were just human made, go ahead and review all the many blatant violations of some of the most violently secured airspace on the planet, COMBINED WITH messing with nuclear sites.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, I mean, humans would never develop tech to try and infiltrate secure locations
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kleine-Brogel in Belgium store U.S. tactical nuclear weapons.

Do you believe that Iran or Russia or China penetrated this facility and its airspace? Repeatedly? And that our president was talking about nation-states when he said of the "drones" - well, uh, I can't really discuss that?
First Page Refresh
Page 178 of 178
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.