*** STREAMING INDUSTRY THREAD ***

37,892 Views | 403 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by YouBet
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Hulu combining with Disney makes my head hurt just thinking about it. We switched from YTTV to Hulu about three months ago and I absolutely hate Hulus UI as is.

Just an absolute mess. Maybe they will improve it with this merger. Would like to see the beta before I cancel them and move back to YTTV though.
I haven't tried Hulu Live yet, but I haven't been impressed YTTV's latest interface. It doesn't let you order your content by name anymore. It's just in a random order. And you have to take more steps to find it. Hate what they did with it. If the price keeps going up I may try Hulu.
ArmyAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If there is a way to order the channels on hulu I don't know what it is. Currently it is alphabetical on mine. For a few weeks the line up was local stations followed by everything else alphabetical, I really liked this.
That said I have been happy with hulu. Works well and is clear.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem314 said:

YouBet said:

Hulu combining with Disney makes my head hurt just thinking about it. We switched from YTTV to Hulu about three months ago and I absolutely hate Hulus UI as is.

Just an absolute mess. Maybe they will improve it with this merger. Would like to see the beta before I cancel them and move back to YTTV though.
I haven't tried Hulu Live yet, but I haven't been impressed YTTV's latest interface. It doesn't let you order your content by name anymore. It's just in a random order. And you have to take more steps to find it. Hate what they did with it. If the price keeps going up I may try Hulu.


Hulu is way more chaotic and it's "AI" is dog***** When we were on YTTV it would serve up relevant stuff I wanted to watch that was on...like the A&M football game.

Hulu does not do that for me unless it's AI is so smart that it realizes we suck and I probably don't want to watch A&M football anymore.
BenTheGoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:


AggieArchitect04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just got the email about this.

Yay. More ads for dish soap and liberty mutual.
felte
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You are not restricted to the YTTV Live Guide channel order - you can can organize it however you like.

The custom sort lets you set the channel order and hide channels that are not of interest. IMO this level of customization is superior to any cable service I've ever had.

To configure the sort, you have to log-in to YTTV via a web browser on a PC. On the Live guide there's an option for Sort. On the Sort drop-down you can select Custom/Edit. The interface is a bit clunky, but you only need to suffer through the sort/favorites/hide setup once and the Custom sort is available on all devices. For example, instead of sorting by ABC title, I have my guide sorted by type of channel - Local/News, Sports, TBS/TNT/Fx, Discovery/Nat Geo/Animal Planet, Food/Reality, etc.


Ferg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I haven't had it for a while, but I thought Fubo lets you customize the guide(easily using your PC if I remember correctly).
ArmyAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Odd. I always get a notification on the home page when A&M is playing.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good to know. Thanks.
Frok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenTheGoodAg said:

TCTTS said:





And here we go, streaming will soon have 5 minutes commercial breaks and cost as much as cable
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem314 said:

YouBet said:

Hulu combining with Disney makes my head hurt just thinking about it. We switched from YTTV to Hulu about three months ago and I absolutely hate Hulus UI as is.

Just an absolute mess. Maybe they will improve it with this merger. Would like to see the beta before I cancel them and move back to YTTV though.
I haven't tried Hulu Live yet, but I haven't been impressed YTTV's latest interface. It doesn't let you order your content by name anymore. It's just in a random order. And you have to take more steps to find it. Hate what they did with it. If the price keeps going up I may try Hulu.
I'll save you the trouble: it's absolutely terrible.

We switched from YTTV to save a bit and switched back before it renewed for the second month.
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed with you on that fig.

But I also agreed that YTTV made some bad UI changes/decisions lately. It was way easier to navigate a month ago. Still the best navigation/control, but not as good as it was. And no I'm not not used to the new interface yet. The old interface was just better.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chipotlemonger said:

Agreed with you on that fig.

But I also agreed that YTTV made some bad UI changes/decisions lately. It was way easier to navigate a month ago. Still the best navigation/control, but not as good as it was. And no I'm not not used to the new interface yet. The old interface was just better.


What did they change because I was going to switch back tomorrow?

I despise Hulu Live. Have I told yall that yet? Well I'm telling you again.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I haven't noticed a significant change to the UI in the last few months. To what are you referring? I've noticed tweaks here and there, of course, but the overall flow of the UI has been the same as it's ever been for me.
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

I haven't noticed a significant change to the UI in the last few months. To what are you referring? I've noticed tweaks here and there, of course, but the overall flow of the UI has been the same as it's ever been for me.
Believe another poster mentioned it, going through the Library section is less structured now. Used to have a little more rhyme and reason to it I feel like, or maybe they just didn't hit you with as many subsections in the Library. That's about the best I can describe it.

Other than that, navigating the Live section is completely the same. Just the tweaks in the Library section have thrown me off a bit.
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
felte said:

You are not restricted to the YTTV Live Guide channel order - you can can organize it however you like.

The custom sort lets you set the channel order and hide channels that are not of interest. IMO this level of customization is superior to any cable service I've ever had.

To configure the sort, you have to log-in to YTTV via a web browser on a PC. On the Live guide there's an option for Sort. On the Sort drop-down you can select Custom/Edit. The interface is a bit clunky, but you only need to suffer through the sort/favorites/hide setup once and the Custom sort is available on all devices. For example, instead of sorting by ABC title, I have my guide sorted by type of channel - Local/News, Sports, TBS/TNT/Fx, Discovery/Nat Geo/Animal Planet, Food/Reality, etc.



Just tried this out and it's a nice feature/

Also, navigating the Library was way easier on my laptop than it has been on the TV. I still don't like all of the subsections, but get why they have them.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chipotlemonger said:

TCTTS said:

I haven't noticed a significant change to the UI in the last few months. To what are you referring? I've noticed tweaks here and there, of course, but the overall flow of the UI has been the same as it's ever been for me.
Believe another poster mentioned it, going through the Library section is less structured now. Used to have a little more rhyme and reason to it I feel like, or maybe they just didn't hit you with as many subsections in the Library. That's about the best I can describe it.

Other than that, navigating the Live section is completely the same. Just the tweaks in the Library section have thrown me off a bit.

Oh, yeah, I'm definitely in agreement that the Library sucks. I miss lists, and especially the way DirecTV handled recorded shows as a list. I also want a more visually distinct way of showing that I've watched something in my Library, if not the ability to "delete" a "recorded" show/episode completely. And please, for the love of God, quit tying my YouTubeTV settings to my YouTube settings, in that if I have history turned off on YouTube, YouTube TV doesn't remember where I left off on a show in my Library. It just starts from the beginning again, which drives me insane.

Finally, while I'm at it, on the Guide side of things, if I'm watching something and I want to view the Guide again, THE GUIDE SHOULD BE AT/HIGHLIGHT THE CHANNEL I'M CURRENTLY ON instead of always starting back at the top. It makes ZERO SENSE why that's a thing.

Don't get me wrong, overall, I absolutely love YouTube TV, but those few (albeit minor) issues can be maddening at times, especially because they seem so simple to fix/implement.
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Okay good I'm not taking crazy pills. The library functionality (which is 80+% of our watching of things) is awkward, and yes seemingly an easy "fix." In quotation marks because they may not see it as needing fixing. I'm a completionist at heart, so that probably adds to my disdain for the way they set it up and especially with the recent changes.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Because I'm a sicko I re-read this entire thread again once I realized it's over a year old...

Damn, there's some good info and insight here. This has been one of my favorite threads on texags because most of the conversations I have are with people in the media (imagine the Lloyd Bridges as McRoskey meme about the picking the wrong week to quit sniffing glue. Etc) I get an entirely new perspective from other people in the biz or adjacent plus just smart, eloquent consumers who have a ton of input of their own that's beyond simple programming good/bad choices.

I wanted to point out Fl_Ag1998 predicted something back in March without even realizing it...something that every basic consumer knows and nobody knows why media wouldnt do this....this is basically what Charter told Disney a few months ago. Ok we'll renew espn but we're not taking the rest of your garbage (Charter changed the packages a lot of Disney channels were on and flat out dropped others) and oh yeah were gonna roll out our own streaming box so we can get that revenue instead of roku, etc.

https://texags.com/forums/13/topics/3350268/replies/64447967



C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
i am ready for it all to implode and consolidate. Then I just buy a la carte per show/per movie what I want to watch. all from a single storefront.

yeah, I may have a wait, but I think we will get to a version of that for several of the players..
BowSowy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chipotlemonger said:

TCTTS said:

I haven't noticed a significant change to the UI in the last few months. To what are you referring? I've noticed tweaks here and there, of course, but the overall flow of the UI has been the same as it's ever been for me.
Believe another poster mentioned it, going through the Library section is less structured now. Used to have a little more rhyme and reason to it I feel like, or maybe they just didn't hit you with as many subsections in the Library. That's about the best I can describe it.

Other than that, navigating the Live section is completely the same. Just the tweaks in the Library section have thrown me off a bit.
On an AppleTV, they have made it to where I have to hunt for our regularly recorded shows. Particularly shows that we record and watch every week. For some reason, they moved those from the default Library page to a "Most Viewed" page. Making it more annoying to find your most watched shows totally makes sense. /s

On the iPad, their UI looks like it's trying to mimic Netflix. It's got rows of programming, starting with "resume watching" which is a little weird for a live TV service.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, it feels like these services are tinkering with the UI simply because they are bored and want to change it up a bit. There is only so much you can do with these UI's and I bet the Product people feel like they need to change it to "keep it fresh". It's over-engineering and forgetting that simpler is better.

My issues with Hulu sound like some of the issues YTTV and Apple have adopted which will be frustrating when I switch this weekend. Too many pages and then too many sections within those pages.


For those assessing what to pick here are my current gripes with Hulu in more detail:

Hulu Home Page Issues:
Live Now is the first row. The problem with Live Now is that it is extremely frustrating if you are looking for live sports because Live Now does not distinguish between games that were played 2 to infinity days ago vs what is actually live right now. For Hulu, Live Now just means what is currently airing on whatever channel they decide to serve up to you. IOW, it's not live TV.

Continue Watching is 4 rows down below the fold, so you have to scroll down to get to your current list of shows you are watching on Hulu.

Live TV Favorites (channels you watch a lot) is 9 rows down. See above.

Hulu Live Issues:
You can't customize anything like you can with YTTV. Anything you save or favorite is dumped into My Favorites. So, if you want to get to your "custom" TV guide, you first have to click My Favorites, then click Networks, and then it's presented as cards that do not show you what is on that channel. Therefore, this feature is unusable.

Hulu Live on AppleTV has no channel guide period, so you have to completely back out of the live show you are watching and go back to the Home page to find something else.

Performance:
The Live Guide (channel guide) is extremely slow to load. I'm on very fast internet that is hard wired to the TV and I get a loading bar when it goes to pull up the channel guide.

And now I'm having an issue I had with it the first time I was on Hulu Live a couple of years ago....it can't hold an HD signal. It flips in and out from SD to HD. That was the reason I switched to YTTV the first time and I never had issues with YTTV doing that. So this is now the second house I've lived in where Hulu can't hold an HD signal.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

i am ready for it all to implode and consolidate. Then I just buy a la carte per show/per movie what I want to watch. all from a single storefront.
We used to call that Blockbuster.
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why Max Decided to Lose 'HBO' in Its Name https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-max-decided-to-lose-hbo-in-its-name-4d888c96
Thought it was an interesting read. Basically, they were afraid the HBO brand pigeonholed them. They were/are expanding to other genres and thought Max better conveyed that message. There is logic there; even if it is failed logic.

HBO = excellent programming. Everyone knows that. Would have been much easier to sell customers on we're expanding what HBO vs memoryholing an iconic brand IMHO.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dmart90 said:

Why Max Decided to Lose 'HBO' in Its Name https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-max-decided-to-lose-hbo-in-its-name-4d888c96
Thought it was an interesting read. Basically, they were afraid the HBO brand pigeonholed them. They were/are expanding to other genres and thought Max better conveyed that message. There is logic there; even if it is failed logic.

HBO = excellent programming. Everyone knows that. Would have been much easier to sell customers on we're expanding what HBO vs memoryholing an iconic brand IMHO.
Agreed. That is amazingly dumb logic. Reading the interview the Marketing guy outsmarted himself.

HBO = iconic, gold standard programming with lord knows how many Emmys.
Cinemax = all the B level programming that also happens to be historically known for soft porn.

Marketing Guy: "It's a simple decision. You go with Cinemax and not HBO because people won't have the same equity in the HBO brand."

So, he picks the brand that has no equity to start with instead of the iconic brand that everyone automatically associates with gold standard quality. Uh, WTF?

Quote:

Spagnoletto: HBO is an iconic brand that stands for premium quality content, with stories that are world-renowned, from "The Sopranos" to "House of the Dragon." The equity of that brand served very well when the company launched HBO Max.

The decision actually became a pretty simple one. Do you kill "HBO Max" or do you kill "HBO"? Because you can't have both. You can't have "HBO" in the name and then put this incredibly varied library under it and expect consumers to have the same equity in the brand.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"We have a lot of shht on this product that doesn't stand up to the HBO name. What should we do about it?"

"Let's just call it Max. That way we don't have to worry about it."
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope the "only on Peacock" playoff game next week is a complete flop. I don't want another damn app or subscription!
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

dmart90 said:

Why Max Decided to Lose 'HBO' in Its Name https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-max-decided-to-lose-hbo-in-its-name-4d888c96
Thought it was an interesting read. Basically, they were afraid the HBO brand pigeonholed them. They were/are expanding to other genres and thought Max better conveyed that message. There is logic there; even if it is failed logic.

HBO = excellent programming. Everyone knows that. Would have been much easier to sell customers on we're expanding what HBO vs memoryholing an iconic brand IMHO.
Agreed. That is amazingly dumb logic. Reading the interview the Marketing guy outsmarted himself.

HBO = iconic, gold standard programming with lord knows how many Emmys.
Cinemax = all the B level programming that also happens to be historically known for soft porn.

Marketing Guy: "It's a simple decision. You go with Cinemax and not HBO because people won't have the same equity in the HBO brand."

So, he picks the brand that has no equity to start with instead of the iconic brand that everyone automatically associates with gold standard quality. Uh, WTF?




And to top it off, they didn't even put some of their top Cinemax TV series on Max.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only other thing I can think here is that they know this is a huge gamble and they are sacrificing the MAX brand to the front lines of the Streaming war while holding the HBO brand in reserve.

Because something is going to give at some point. None of these options are making money and they are all getting more expensive. It's a big game of Streaming Highlander at this point. There can be only 2-3 core services at the end and he thinks that as well.

If that's what they are doing, then I can possibly understand this.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

i am ready for it all to implode and consolidate. Then I just buy a la carte per show/per movie what I want to watch. all from a single storefront.

yeah, I may have a wait, but I think we will get to a version of that for several of the players..


More consolidations are coming, but I think the Charter/Disney arrangement will be more common for the cable/satellite providers.

People who truly want just a la carte can use Google, Apple or Amazon
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Figured I would just drop this here,

YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Perfect.
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As far as UI goes, I'm waiting for someone to figure out that making viewing preferences on a channel (prime, Hulu, Netflix, etc) much more customizable by the viewer is a huge boon.

I don't need their algorithms constantly asking me if I want to watch something I don't give a **** about. I want to deselect that from my portal and see only the crap I prefer.
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oragator said:

Figured I would just drop this here,


This convo would make zero sense to someone thirty years ago.

Plus I suspect it's fake. I've seen a video with a woman having almost the exact same talk.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
superunknown said:

"We have a lot of shht on this product that doesn't stand up to the HBO name. What should we do about it?"

"Let's just call it Max. That way we don't have to worry about it."

I had HBO streaming and now can't get it on my Smart TV

it's the weirdest thing. so i have to watch the Dolphins Season of Hard Knocks through Amazon Prime
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.