*** Q: INTO THE STORM *** (HBO Docuseries)

63,884 Views | 790 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by St Hedwig Aggie
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ruddyduck said:

seems pertinent to the current discussion.









CNN and all 24 hour entertainment news is ****
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Now do Fox News.

Now do MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NY Times, WAPO, Netflix, HBO, etc, etc, etc. down to almost every local news organization.

While Fox News is no better, they are merely a market response to the rest of the industry being radical leftists.

If the journalism industry held themselves to a higher standard and didn't act as the propaganda wing of the DNC then there would be no need for Fox News to exist.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Now do Fox News.


i don't watch fox news. i didn't make any commentary. i just saw this on twitter and thought it would be good to discuss here given the ongoing discussion about sources.

i should have known whataboutism would rule the day.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't watch either regularly. Like we've been saying, they *all* suck.

If there's some kind of crises or big, news-worthy event, I'll watch CNN's coverage, for no other reason than I can tolerate their personalities more than those at Fox News/MSNBC. Otherwise, it's all noise and agendas.
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ruddyduck said:

TCTTS said:

Now do Fox News.


i don't watch fox news. i didn't make any commentary. i just saw this on twitter and thought it would be good to discuss here given the ongoing discussion about sources.

i should have known whataboutism would rule the day.
Except no one is saying CNN is good and that you should watch it. Dude was recommending a Hunter Biden scandal website as news. Unless there is some major event that requires a video feed, don't turn on entertainment news.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Doug said:

ruddyduck said:

TCTTS said:

Now do Fox News.


i don't watch fox news. i didn't make any commentary. i just saw this on twitter and thought it would be good to discuss here given the ongoing discussion about sources.

i should have known whataboutism would rule the day.
Except no one is saying CNN is good and that you should watch it. Dude was recommending a Hunter Biden scandal website as news. Unless there is some major event that requires a video feed, don't turn on entertainment news.


It is ridiculous...we all know the real scandal is how little Biden tweets
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have
tk for tu juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For any major event, just watch the live stream of the local news close to the event. It will be slightly more accurate plus you get more entertaining "man on the street" interviews
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
bluefire579
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
You literally spit out a wall of text that was just insulting him (or whoever that post was directed at) based on whatever strange notions of liberals exist in your mind. You really don't have a leg to stand on here
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.

Of course you did.

When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.

Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a lot of words to say "I worship satan"
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Shhhhh! We can't let them decode our messaging!
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
next time go into more detail about how clever I am
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
No interest in trying to persuade someone out of the 16chan rabbit hole, easier to just let yall fall deeper until your family stages an intervention and/or the FBI shows up.
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd like to see the unedited videos before drawing any conclusions. Project Veritas is known for over promising and under delivering on their claims by using selective editing.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bluefire579 said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
You literally spit out a wall of text that was just insulting him (or whoever that post was directed at) based on whatever strange notions of liberals exist in your mind. You really don't have a leg to stand on here


He's admitted to believing in the Russian collusion conspiracy theory on this very thread while thumbing his nose at sources used by conservatives. Maybe you should bother reading the thread next time before making a useless comment with zero understanding of the context of my post.
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

bluefire579 said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
You literally spit out a wall of text that was just insulting him (or whoever that post was directed at) based on whatever strange notions of liberals exist in your mind. You really don't have a leg to stand on here


He's admitted to believing in the Russian collusion conspiracy theory on this very thread while thumbing his nose at sources used by conservatives. Maybe you should bother reading the thread next time before making a useless comment with zero understanding of the context of my post.


I don't believe Russian collusion had anything to do with the result of the 2016 election. Doesn't change the fact the the Trump administration started an investigation, fired, charged and convicted its own members.
bluefire579
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

bluefire579 said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
You literally spit out a wall of text that was just insulting him (or whoever that post was directed at) based on whatever strange notions of liberals exist in your mind. You really don't have a leg to stand on here


He's admitted to believing in the Russian collusion conspiracy theory on this very thread while thumbing his nose at sources used by conservatives. Maybe you should bother reading the thread next time before making a useless comment with zero understanding of the context of my post.
I have been reading the thread. You go absent for days worth of discussion, then randomly poke your head in with that nonsense above. Clearly this guy is living rent-free in your mind if he's setting you off that much, returning after so long to let loose such a ridiculously biased diatribe like that.
St Hedwig Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.

Of course you did.

When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.

Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).


Interesting points but I'd argue that the country is more:

1/3 truly liberal
1/3 truly conservative
1/3 a mix of both
Make Mental Asylums Great Again!
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.

Of course you did.

When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.

Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).


It wasn't clever, it was ignorant and childish.

The claim that the vast majority of the media is left wing propaganda is not born out of propaganda but personal observation over the two decades that I've been following politics. Anyone with a triple digit IQ can see that a media machine that sides with Democrats 95%+ of the time is not objective by any measure. If you think the journalism industry is even close to moderate then I have a bridge to sell you, because that's just not even close to reality. Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average? Just saying that my opinion on the state of journalism in America is born out of propaganda is a very poorly formed argument and has no basis in reality. Furthermore it's untruthful and you know it.

I'm not sure how pointing out that the left's news sources are nothing more than DNC propaganda is ascribing the worst features of the far left to all liberals? That doesn't make sense and as I said before is evidence of his inability to form a persuasive argument.

The rest of your post is completely irrelevant to the conversation, but I will say that he literally states that he wants socialism in the meme.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
West Point Aggie said:





Interesting points but I'd argue that the country is more:

1/3 truly liberal
1/3 truly conservative
1/3 a mix of both
try
1% fringe traditional conservatives/right wing types
8% educated actual americans
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican voters who think they are serious conservatives
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican socialist voters who think they are moderate conservatives
25% full tilt socialist useful idiots who think they are moderate democrats or actually believe that there is anything good in the current dem platform they are brainwashed into supporting
20% useful idiots who vote democrat and dont even know what anything means
5% full tilt communist useful idiots who dont realize they are useful idiots
1% the international financial elites and their minions who know what is going on and are using the useful socialist idiots and all this pc bull**** to destroy america and cement their elite status


and for evidence of these percentages, check the star counts on this thread....

Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:


1% fringe traditional conservatives/right wing types


So your view of the distribution of political views is so skewed that "traditional conservatives" are fridge.


You might want to unplug and go walk the Appalachian trail, do some drugs or at a minimum seek some help.

aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bluefire579 said:

aggieforester05 said:

bluefire579 said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
You literally spit out a wall of text that was just insulting him (or whoever that post was directed at) based on whatever strange notions of liberals exist in your mind. You really don't have a leg to stand on here


He's admitted to believing in the Russian collusion conspiracy theory on this very thread while thumbing his nose at sources used by conservatives. Maybe you should bother reading the thread next time before making a useless comment with zero understanding of the context of my post.
I have been reading the thread. You go absent for days worth of discussion, then randomly poke your head in with that nonsense above. Clearly this guy is living rent-free in your mind if he's setting you off that much, returning after so long to let loose such a ridiculously biased diatribe like that.


He was admonishing cbr for recommending news sources because cbr had at one time followed a conspiracy theory. He himself has professed belief in multiple conspiracy theories in this thread. It's hypocritical and condescending because the general theme in this thread has been that left wing conspiracy theories and media sources are somehow more reasonable than right wing conspiracy theories and media sources when that is anything but the case. It's comical to watch lefties ridicule those crazy Q followers while they themselves fall for maybe more subtle but much more mainstream conspiracy theories based on pure fantasies and the lies of people with no credibility.
Ervin Burrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

TCTTS said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.

Of course you did.

When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.

Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).


Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cbr said:

West Point Aggie said:





Interesting points but I'd argue that the country is more:

1/3 truly liberal
1/3 truly conservative
1/3 a mix of both
try
1% fringe traditional conservatives/right wing types
8% educated actual americans
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican voters who think they are serious conservatives
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican socialist voters who think they are moderate conservatives
25% full tilt socialist useful idiots who think they are moderate democrats or actually believe that there is anything good in the current dem platform they are brainwashed into supporting
20% useful idiots who vote democrat and dont even know what anything means
5% full tilt communist useful idiots who dont realize they are useful idiots
1% the international financial elites and their minions who know what is going on and are using the useful socialist idiots and all this pc bull**** to destroy america and cement their elite status


and for evidence of these percentages, check the star counts on this thread....




Dear Dairy,

I posted my conspiracy drivel on the internet, and got made fun of. Then a lot people liked the posts making fun of me. This can only mean one thing...

The conspiracy is bigger than I ever imagined!

WWG1WGA
CQR
Ervin Burrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cbr said:

West Point Aggie said:





Interesting points but I'd argue that the country is more:

1/3 truly liberal
1/3 truly conservative
1/3 a mix of both
try
1% fringe traditional conservatives/right wing types
8% educated actual americans
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican voters who think they are serious conservatives
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican socialist voters who think they are moderate conservatives
25% full tilt socialist useful idiots who think they are moderate democrats or actually believe that there is anything good in the current dem platform they are brainwashed into supporting
20% useful idiots who vote democrat and dont even know what anything means
5% full tilt communist useful idiots who dont realize they are useful idiots
1% the international financial elites and their minions who know what is going on and are using the useful socialist idiots and all this pc bull**** to destroy america and cement their elite status


and for evidence of these percentages, check the star counts on this thread....


What about the "liberals only care about white genocide" type posts on 16 chan that get 100 blue stars? LOL at a 16chan poster b/tching about stars...that board is the KING of star harvesting and it has ten times the traffic of this board.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ervin Burrell said:

aggieforester05 said:

TCTTS said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.

Of course you did.

When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.

Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).


Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.

I've tried using this exact rationale with them but they won't have it. Once you factor in "Hollywood" and the overwhelming abundance of evil, socialist messaging peddled by pedophiles on every channel and streaming service, all trying to sway children to change genders after failing to turning them gay... the left FAR outweighs the right when it comes to political and cultural messaging. That's just a known, statical fact.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those are the one percent normal traditional conservatives...you might not be old enough but we use to call them Reagan Republicans.

You know the ones that love American, respect law and order so much that they cheered a seditionist and rooted for an attempted coup. Just like Saint Reagan would have wanted
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ervin Burrell said:

aggieforester05 said:

TCTTS said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.

Of course you did.

When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.

Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).


Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.


Wow, I didn't think anyone would dare go down this road. Nowhere did I say the entire media. The vast majority, absolutely and anyone who argues otherwise is living in an alternate reality. Fox and Rush may have (had) good ratings but combined only represent a small fraction of American media. Journalism, entertainment, sports (more coverage related than management and players), and academics are heavily biased in favor of left wing politics. I'm not sure why anyone would even try to argue that. I believe it's primarily due to the type of people that pursue those professions. They are typically right brained and there's nothing wrong with that. It has organically created an imbalance in media coverage of political and social media that is problematic though. Social media/big tech companies I believe lean the way they do because they typically employ younger people and are concentrated in very blue areas.
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cbr said:

West Point Aggie said:





Interesting points but I'd argue that the country is more:

1/3 truly liberal
1/3 truly conservative
1/3 a mix of both
try
1% fringe traditional conservatives/right wing types
8% educated actual americans
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican voters who think they are serious conservatives
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican socialist voters who think they are moderate conservatives
25% full tilt socialist useful idiots who think they are moderate democrats or actually believe that there is anything good in the current dem platform they are brainwashed into supporting
20% useful idiots who vote democrat and dont even know what anything means
5% full tilt communist useful idiots who dont realize they are useful idiots
1% the international financial elites and their minions who know what is going on and are using the useful socialist idiots and all this pc bull**** to destroy america and cement their elite status


and for evidence of these percentages, check the star counts on this thread....




So based on these percentages, about 51% of people are Democrats or are even further left.

-How much of the popular vote did Joe Biden secure?
-51%
-Do your research
-The Storm is coming
-The Great Awakening is happening
-Watch this before it get taken down
-WWG1WGA
-Q
Ervin Burrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

Ervin Burrell said:

aggieforester05 said:

TCTTS said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.

Of course you did.

When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.

Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).


Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.


Wow, I didn't think anyone would dare go down this road. Nowhere did I say the entire media. The vast majority, absolutely and anyone who argues otherwise is living in an alternate reality. Fox and Rush may have (had) good ratings but combined only represent a small fraction of American media. Journalism, entertainment, sports (more coverage related than management and players), and academics are heavily biased in favor of left wing politics. I'm not sure why anyone would even try to argue that. I believe it's primarily due to the type of people that pursue those professions. They are typically right brained and there's nothing wrong with that. It has organically created an imbalance in media coverage of political and social media that is problematic though. Social media/big tech companies I believe lean the way they do because they typically employ younger people and are concentrated in very blue areas.
Your posts more indicate that you'd prefer these folks dead as opposed to there being "nothing wrong" with how they think.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ervin Burrell said:

aggieforester05 said:

Ervin Burrell said:

aggieforester05 said:

TCTTS said:

aggieforester05 said:

Duncan Idaho said:

Another Doug said:

aggieforester05 said:

You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.


Madee laugh harder than it should have


I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.

Of course you did.

When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.

Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).


Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.


Wow, I didn't think anyone would dare go down this road. Nowhere did I say the entire media. The vast majority, absolutely and anyone who argues otherwise is living in an alternate reality. Fox and Rush may have (had) good ratings but combined only represent a small fraction of American media. Journalism, entertainment, sports (more coverage related than management and players), and academics are heavily biased in favor of left wing politics. I'm not sure why anyone would even try to argue that. I believe it's primarily due to the type of people that pursue those professions. They are typically right brained and there's nothing wrong with that. It has organically created an imbalance in media coverage of political and social media that is problematic though. Social media/big tech companies I believe lean the way they do because they typically employ younger people and are concentrated in very blue areas.
Your post more indicate that you'd prefer these folks dead as opposed to there being "nothing wrong" with how they think.


In no fan of left wing politics, but I've never wished anyone dead and I'm not one arguing for civil war. I think there's a lot wrong with voting for or defending Democrats, my post above is stating that there's nothing wrong with being right brained. I'm further left on many issues than you might imagine, but the current trajectory of the Democrat party and their ability to act with near impunity is not good for this country at all imo.
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oooff
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.