TCTTS said:
Now do Fox News.
TCTTS said:
Now do Fox News.
Except no one is saying CNN is good and that you should watch it. Dude was recommending a Hunter Biden scandal website as news. Unless there is some major event that requires a video feed, don't turn on entertainment news.ruddyduck said:TCTTS said:
Now do Fox News.
i don't watch fox news. i didn't make any commentary. i just saw this on twitter and thought it would be good to discuss here given the ongoing discussion about sources.
i should have known whataboutism would rule the day.
Another Doug said:Except no one is saying CNN is good and that you should watch it. Dude was recommending a Hunter Biden scandal website as news. Unless there is some major event that requires a video feed, don't turn on entertainment news.ruddyduck said:TCTTS said:
Now do Fox News.
i don't watch fox news. i didn't make any commentary. i just saw this on twitter and thought it would be good to discuss here given the ongoing discussion about sources.
i should have known whataboutism would rule the day.
Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
You literally spit out a wall of text that was just insulting him (or whoever that post was directed at) based on whatever strange notions of liberals exist in your mind. You really don't have a leg to stand on hereaggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
aggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
No interest in trying to persuade someone out of the 16chan rabbit hole, easier to just let yall fall deeper until your family stages an intervention and/or the FBI shows up.aggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
bluefire579 said:You literally spit out a wall of text that was just insulting him (or whoever that post was directed at) based on whatever strange notions of liberals exist in your mind. You really don't have a leg to stand on hereaggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
aggieforester05 said:bluefire579 said:You literally spit out a wall of text that was just insulting him (or whoever that post was directed at) based on whatever strange notions of liberals exist in your mind. You really don't have a leg to stand on hereaggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
He's admitted to believing in the Russian collusion conspiracy theory on this very thread while thumbing his nose at sources used by conservatives. Maybe you should bother reading the thread next time before making a useless comment with zero understanding of the context of my post.
TCTTS said:aggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
Of course you did.
When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.
Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).
TCTTS said:aggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
Of course you did.
When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.
Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).
tryWest Point Aggie said:
Interesting points but I'd argue that the country is more:
1/3 truly liberal
1/3 truly conservative
1/3 a mix of both
Quote:
1% fringe traditional conservatives/right wing types
bluefire579 said:I have been reading the thread. You go absent for days worth of discussion, then randomly poke your head in with that nonsense above. Clearly this guy is living rent-free in your mind if he's setting you off that much, returning after so long to let loose such a ridiculously biased diatribe like that.aggieforester05 said:bluefire579 said:You literally spit out a wall of text that was just insulting him (or whoever that post was directed at) based on whatever strange notions of liberals exist in your mind. You really don't have a leg to stand on hereaggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
He's admitted to believing in the Russian collusion conspiracy theory on this very thread while thumbing his nose at sources used by conservatives. Maybe you should bother reading the thread next time before making a useless comment with zero understanding of the context of my post.
Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.aggieforester05 said:TCTTS said:aggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
Of course you did.
When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.
Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).
Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
cbr said:tryWest Point Aggie said:
Interesting points but I'd argue that the country is more:
1/3 truly liberal
1/3 truly conservative
1/3 a mix of both
1% fringe traditional conservatives/right wing types
8% educated actual americans
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican voters who think they are serious conservatives
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican socialist voters who think they are moderate conservatives
25% full tilt socialist useful idiots who think they are moderate democrats or actually believe that there is anything good in the current dem platform they are brainwashed into supporting
20% useful idiots who vote democrat and dont even know what anything means
5% full tilt communist useful idiots who dont realize they are useful idiots
1% the international financial elites and their minions who know what is going on and are using the useful socialist idiots and all this pc bull**** to destroy america and cement their elite status
and for evidence of these percentages, check the star counts on this thread....
What about the "liberals only care about white genocide" type posts on 16 chan that get 100 blue stars? LOL at a 16chan poster b/tching about stars...that board is the KING of star harvesting and it has ten times the traffic of this board.cbr said:tryWest Point Aggie said:
Interesting points but I'd argue that the country is more:
1/3 truly liberal
1/3 truly conservative
1/3 a mix of both
1% fringe traditional conservatives/right wing types
8% educated actual americans
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican voters who think they are serious conservatives
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican socialist voters who think they are moderate conservatives
25% full tilt socialist useful idiots who think they are moderate democrats or actually believe that there is anything good in the current dem platform they are brainwashed into supporting
20% useful idiots who vote democrat and dont even know what anything means
5% full tilt communist useful idiots who dont realize they are useful idiots
1% the international financial elites and their minions who know what is going on and are using the useful socialist idiots and all this pc bull**** to destroy america and cement their elite status
and for evidence of these percentages, check the star counts on this thread....
Ervin Burrell said:Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.aggieforester05 said:TCTTS said:aggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
Of course you did.
When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.
Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).
Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
Ervin Burrell said:Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.aggieforester05 said:TCTTS said:aggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
Of course you did.
When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.
Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).
Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
cbr said:tryWest Point Aggie said:
Interesting points but I'd argue that the country is more:
1/3 truly liberal
1/3 truly conservative
1/3 a mix of both
1% fringe traditional conservatives/right wing types
8% educated actual americans
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican voters who think they are serious conservatives
20% brainwashed useful idiot republican socialist voters who think they are moderate conservatives
25% full tilt socialist useful idiots who think they are moderate democrats or actually believe that there is anything good in the current dem platform they are brainwashed into supporting
20% useful idiots who vote democrat and dont even know what anything means
5% full tilt communist useful idiots who dont realize they are useful idiots
1% the international financial elites and their minions who know what is going on and are using the useful socialist idiots and all this pc bull**** to destroy america and cement their elite status
and for evidence of these percentages, check the star counts on this thread....
Your posts more indicate that you'd prefer these folks dead as opposed to there being "nothing wrong" with how they think.aggieforester05 said:Ervin Burrell said:Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.aggieforester05 said:TCTTS said:aggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
Of course you did.
When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.
Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).
Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
Wow, I didn't think anyone would dare go down this road. Nowhere did I say the entire media. The vast majority, absolutely and anyone who argues otherwise is living in an alternate reality. Fox and Rush may have (had) good ratings but combined only represent a small fraction of American media. Journalism, entertainment, sports (more coverage related than management and players), and academics are heavily biased in favor of left wing politics. I'm not sure why anyone would even try to argue that. I believe it's primarily due to the type of people that pursue those professions. They are typically right brained and there's nothing wrong with that. It has organically created an imbalance in media coverage of political and social media that is problematic though. Social media/big tech companies I believe lean the way they do because they typically employ younger people and are concentrated in very blue areas.
Ervin Burrell said:Your post more indicate that you'd prefer these folks dead as opposed to there being "nothing wrong" with how they think.aggieforester05 said:Ervin Burrell said:Don't Fox News and conservative talk radio types ala Rush and Hannity absolutely dominate the ratings? Or is that "different"? You can say "yeah, well that's just a response to the others"...but when those dominate to the tune of being higher than the next three shows combined, your "the entire media is left" response doesn't hold weight.aggieforester05 said:TCTTS said:aggieforester05 said:Duncan Idaho said:Another Doug said:aggieforester05 said:
You really think the left wing garbage you consume has any credibility? The condescension is simply stunning from your position. You believe in Democrat fantasies that are no better than Q theories. You liberals are so saturated in fabricated propaganda that you think it's "the norm" or "the truth" and that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is a nut job. Again a little self awareness from the left would do wonders for this country. Your news sources are no better than those you decry on the right. They're just more mainstream because journalism and entertainment industries tend to attract left wing types. Social media has amplified this phenomenon.
Madee laugh harder than it should have
I thought it was a great example of his immaturity and inability to form a persuasive argument.
Of course you did.
When, in reality, he quite cleverly and hilariously mocked the way in which you paint with the broadest, most comical of brushes an entire half of the country with sweeping generalizations that, themselves, are born out of "fabricated propaganda." He's pointing out the fact that you're taking the worst of the far, extreme left and ascribing it to the vast majority.
Especially when someone like me, who lives in one of the most liberal cities in the world (Los Angeles, in this case) - and works among the "Hollywood elites" - doesn't know a single liberal who wants socialism, open borders, to take your guns away, to kill babies, etc, or fits the fever-dream caricature 16chan often propagates. Rather, most of them simply want a few tweaks - some bigger than others, relatively speaking - to the current system (i.e. to see things like Medicare expanded, to make it just *slightly* harder to buy a gun, etc).
Do you have a legitimate argument showing that journalism and entertainment is moderate, balanced, or anything but far left on average?
Wow, I didn't think anyone would dare go down this road. Nowhere did I say the entire media. The vast majority, absolutely and anyone who argues otherwise is living in an alternate reality. Fox and Rush may have (had) good ratings but combined only represent a small fraction of American media. Journalism, entertainment, sports (more coverage related than management and players), and academics are heavily biased in favor of left wing politics. I'm not sure why anyone would even try to argue that. I believe it's primarily due to the type of people that pursue those professions. They are typically right brained and there's nothing wrong with that. It has organically created an imbalance in media coverage of political and social media that is problematic though. Social media/big tech companies I believe lean the way they do because they typically employ younger people and are concentrated in very blue areas.