lazuras_dc said:
Who knew that having all of human knowledge at our fingertips would make us DUMBER
Its not that we're dumber but that we think we know more about subjects than we really do.
It's not unlike taking an open book test. I know now that open book tests were always the hardest. My Public Administration prof at A&M had nothing but open book tests admitting that in real life you will have access to all the information, books and tools. It was more important to know where the relevant material/information was, than knowing exactly what it was. What we all found was that when you know that it's an open book test in advance, people are going to study the material less than for a closed book test. Yes, we would know about the material but we never really
knew (or grok, for you scf-fi fans out there) the material. Sometimes you could 'fake it until you make it' but other times you find yourself just pulling BS out of the air and try to make it sound like you knew what you were talking about. You would try and skirt by sounding more knowledgeable than you really were. The prof, as an expert in the field, could often tell the difference but I doubt average person could.
And I think the same happens all the time now. People with only passing knowledge comment on subjects with enough conviction and it convinces readers they are correct when in fact they are mostly uninformed and passing on that bad information or malformed ideas. And, to use a math/physics concept, information is never destroyed so it's really hard to stop bad info and ideas. George Carlin once talked about people being stupid, full of **** and ****ing nuts. Stupid and nuts can be easy, but distinguishing those that are FoS are the hardest for adults and it is damn near impossible for kids.