I think she stole that move from Jenna Jameson, I smell another lawsuit coming
schmendeler said:
Definitely a church girl
Even temples have artwork on the wallksPatAg said:To them, rap is something "hoodlums" do.CDub06 said:Duncan Idaho said:
The idea of "Christian rap" is as dumb as "Christian tattoos".
I'll bite. How so? (On both accounts)
and "my body is a temple" literal translation instead of using their brain to think for themselves
Exactly. All of Nashville country have the exact same beat these daysTexjbA&M said:
Just listened to both, if they can win that lawsuit we should throw copywriting songs out the window. It's so small what they share. There's only so much you can do with music, elements from different song pop in all sorts of other songs. It's inevitable. You couldn't copyright anything in country music if you used this standard.
Quote:
and "my body is a temple" literal translation instead of using their brain to think for themselves
Frok said:
Obligatory:
And while we're on the subject, that can be said about Christian pop music as well. And there are actually some really good Christian singer-songwriters and bands out there. But like most of the major genre's, the vast majority of the top 20 radio hits all sound the same.wangus12 said:Exactly. All of Nashville country have the exact same beat these daysTexjbA&M said:
Just listened to both, if they can win that lawsuit we should throw copywriting songs out the window. It's so small what they share. There's only so much you can do with music, elements from different song pop in all sorts of other songs. It's inevitable. You couldn't copyright anything in country music if you used this standard.
This is a good breakdown. But, he is wrong: they filed suit in 2014 (the year after Dark Horse came out). They probably made a claim well before suit was filed.tk for tu juan said:
Here is an argument for the defense to use on an appeal
Geriatric Punk said:This is a good breakdown. But, he is wrong: they filed suit in 2014 (the year after Dark Horse came out). They probably made a claim well before suit was filed.tk for tu juan said:
Here is an argument for the defense to use on an appeal
Still, I don't think the jury got it right. I'd bet this gets overturned. There is truly nothing new under the sun these days.
CDub06 said:
Still waiting for some sort of justification on this comment. Or are you just stirring the pot.
Quote:
You shall not make any gashes in your flesh for the dead or tattoo any marks upon you: I am the LORD."
PatAg said:
As long as the Lord said it
Duncan Idaho said:PatAg said:
As long as the Lord said it
Glad we are in agreement. Biblically speaking tattoos are a sin equal, if not greater than homosexuality or adultery
PaulSimonsGhost said:Duncan Idaho said:PatAg said:
As long as the Lord said it
Glad we are in agreement. Biblically speaking tattoos are a sin equal, if not greater than homosexuality or adultery
Duncan, there is no way on hell you believe a tattoo is on par with a marital affair or truck stop rendezvous.
We're are under New Testament jurisdiction and tattoos are not in anyway contrary to the Gospels.
TCTTS said:
Also, arguing that tattoos are a sin is peak TexAgs. Mindsets like that are why I and I'm sure many others have stopped attending church and instead choose to "worship" in our own ways, far away from that kind of crazy.
TCTTS said:
When I first moved to LA in '05, I attended Bel-Air Presbyterian. Katy performed in one of the church bands. I think it was for the Tuesday night, young adult-focused service, but I can't remember for sure. I just remember seeing her quite often. Of course, she wasn't Katy Perry back then. She went by her real name. I eventually stopped going to that church (and church in general, for the most part), and the next time I saw her she was a promiscuous pop star. Kind of crazy.
Also, I know one of her publicists quite well now, and I can confirm that Katy is batsh*t insane.
TCTTS said:
When I first moved to LA in '05, I attended Bel-Air Presbyterian. Katy performed in one of the church bands. I think it was for the Tuesday night, young adult-focused service, but I can't remember for sure. I just remember seeing her quite often. Of course, she wasn't Katy Perry back then. She went by her real name. I eventually stopped going to that church (and church in general, for the most part), and the next time I saw her she was a promiscuous pop star. Kind of crazy.
Also, I know one of her publicists quite well now, and I can confirm that Katy is batsh*t insane.
TCTTS said:
Ha, weirdly, that actually makes me like her more now...