*** MOVIE TRAILERS & RELEASE DATES ***

1,063,894 Views | 6617 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Average Joe
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:53p, 10/9/26
AG
The Last Temptation of Becky
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt40210362/
November 4, 2026 = Theatrical Limited

Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:31p, 10/12/26
AG
Reply Quote
1
Cinco Ranch Aggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 2:33p, 10/12/26
AG
Based on what I've read about the film, I won't be watching.
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
schmendeler
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 2:45p, 10/12/26
AG
Interesting, they are going by the new book order
Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cinco Ranch Aggie • 2:46p, 10/12/26
AG
The TexAgs Way: Before laying eyes on a single second of footage, going out of one's way to proudly let everyone know they won't be seeing said movie.

Look, it may very well end up not being everyone's cup of tea, but this bizarre need to pre-pick sides, virtue signal, etc, will never not be so weird to me. I'm already exhausted by the discourse around this movie and it hasn't even started yet. Can we just skip it this time?
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
veryfuller
User Profile
Private Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 2:59p, 10/12/26
Staff
AG
Nah lets start a thread and take it to over 100 pages.

OR we could all learn from the past and just ignore people who have different philosophies on whether to be open minded to movies or not.

Don't want to see it based on whatever buzz/rumors/interviews/tweets you've read. Cool man. You do you.

Excited or intrigued to see how this director takes on this material, even if it may be different from what you love about the property? Great! Hope that works out for you!
Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to veryfuller • 3:52p, 10/12/26
AG
Ignoring the horde is way easier said than done, but on everything else I agree. That said, I am going to start a thread just to keep the inevitable discourse out of this one.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Cinco Ranch Aggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 4:12p, 10/12/26
AG
TCTTS said:
The TexAgs Way: Before laying eyes on a single second of footage, going out of one's way to proudly let everyone know they won't be seeing said movie.

Look, it may very well end up not being everyone's cup of tea, but this bizarre need to pre-pick sides, virtue signal, etc, will never not be so weird to me. I'm already exhausted by the discourse around this movie and it hasn't even started yet. Can we just skip it this time?

I love how you ascribe "virtue signaling" to me. It's really nothing more than the way that Hollywood must always alter well-known stories to fit some political agenda and to update something for a "modern" audience, whatever that is. Aslan is not a female character. That's a hard stop for me, particularly given the Christian undertones of the entire Narnia story. Plus whatever they are trying to say with the lion's eyes being a different color based on the story that was posted somewhere on TA about a month ago - wtf is that? You want to call that virtue signaling, you're free to do so, just as I am free to take your opinion for what it's worth.
Reply Quote
5
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cinco Ranch Aggie • 4:20p, 10/12/26
AG
Before laying eyes on a single frame, you, a conservative, felt compelled to let everyone know that you're not going to see the movie directed by a Hollywood liberal. In the process claiming, without any proof whatsoever, that the movie has a "political agenda" (deviations from the source material do not automatically count as "political" just because you claim them to be). That is the very definition of virtue signaling, and the kind of endless, premature, eye-rolling soap boxing this board is known for.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:22p, 10/12/26
AG
Dedicated thread created, which is apparently going be The Odyssey all over again...

https://texags.com/forums/13/topics/3632052/
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
Cinco Ranch Aggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 4:26p, 10/12/26
AG
If the publicity is anywhere near true, then I don't need to see it to recognize the political crap they have inserted into it. Meryl Streep voicing Aslan? You mean they could not locate one single male voice actor to do that? Liam Neeson wasn't available? And going from that casting choice, I then have to wonder what else they might change.

Now it's not like this particular story is one of the most recognized stories of the Narnia series. It was technically the first story in the series (ala The Phantom Menace) but was not published first. It's a story that I would very much like to see, as it was written at least to the point of established characters matching how they are described in the book. But nope, Hollywood can't have that. Gotta get that "modern" audience while taking a giant crap on the actual fans of the material.
Reply Quote
3
Cinco Ranch Aggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 4:26p, 10/12/26
AG
TCTTS said:
Dedicated thread created, which is apparently going be The Odyssey all over again...

https://texags.com/forums/13/topics/3632052/

Thanks! Now I have somewhere else to "virtue signal".
Reply Quote
4
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cinco Ranch Aggie • 4:32p, 10/12/26
AG
"The talking lion who's an allegory for Jesus shouldn't sound like Meryl Streep!" is the new "The Little Mermaid can't be black!" Good Lord, the thought of getting worked up over such a thing is just so incredibly dumb.
Reply Quote
4
PlanoAggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 4:44p, 10/12/26
AG
I haven't really delved into what y'all are bantering about, but is Streep really voicing a male lion?
Reply Quote
RED AG 98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PlanoAggie • 4:48p, 10/12/26
AG
No, Streep is voicing Aslan, who in this *******ization of the story of Christ is female.

ETA; Leaving my original comment but it appears I'm wrong. Evidently Aslan is still male, just voiced by Streep. Apologies for the misinformation; I guess I assumed and well you know the rest.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Average Joe
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:04p, 10/12/26
AG
I thought they came out and said that Aslan is still male in the movie despite Streep voicing him. If that's the case, then that's not anything even remotely new when it comes to voice acting.
Reply Quote
1
veryfuller
User Profile
Private Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 5:05p, 10/12/26
Staff
AG
I don't want to get all up in this, BUT...its not meant to be an allegory. Aslan is supposed to BE the representation of Christ in the world of Narnia. That is why fans of the books, specifically Christian fans who know what Lewis was intending with his stories, feel offended by making the voice of Aslan female.

That said, I've heard Meryl read an audiobook (very well I might ad) and I think she has the chops to make the voice male and work. But I'm not sure if that is where they are going with it or not. If Bowie is also an inspiration, they may be going for that glam rock look that was considered cool in the 70s/80s, and a feminized voice may not be as offensive as it seems at first blush in 2026.

So I think fans have every reason to be nervous or not interested, but I also think one can have an open mind and be pleasantly surprised as well. WE ARE ALL COOL YOU GUYS!
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to veryfuller • 5:20p, 10/12/26
AG
I totally get not liking the idea of it. Rather, it's the performative anger from grown men on a message board, before seeing a frame of the movie itself, that I find dumb/hilarious.
Reply Quote
1
Average Joe
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 5:37p, 10/12/26
AG
TCTTS said:
I totally get not liking the idea of it. Rather, it's the performative anger from grown men on a message board, before seeing a frame of the movie itself, that I find dumb/hilarious.

The ironic part is that Jesus wouldn't have given a damn if Aslan was male/female or who voiced him. Christ wouldn't have cared if he was female himself.
Reply Quote
4
Gig-Em2003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:41p, 10/12/26
AG
I get excited for some new trailers and it's just one new trailer and this drivel. Take it to the specific thread please.
Reply Quote
1
Murder Hornet
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 6:41p, 10/12/26
AG
TCTTS said:
I totally get not liking the idea of it. Rather, it's the performative anger from grown men on a message board, before seeing a frame of the movie itself, that I find dumb/hilarious.


TC, I generally like you and you bring lots to this board but this is an example of your condescension

Why does it have to be performative anger that people point out some questionable casting choices and creative decisions?

So far all we have are articles; nothing has been seen. However, people have opinions and given the obvious political leanings of the director and the original source material, perhaps what you perceive as performative outrage are legitimate concerns for a very well known and well loved story.

My opinion based solely on what has been discussed so far…at some point being transgressive just for the sake of being transgressive is incredibly tiresome
Reply Quote
7
Cinco Ranch Aggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 6:52p, 10/12/26
AG
TCTTS said:
I totally get not liking the idea of it. Rather, it's the performative anger from grown men on a message board, before seeing a frame of the movie itself, that I find dumb/hilarious.

So now I am performing?

Goodness. No, I am conveying a response to a change to a set of stories that I have treasured for damn near my entire life. And veryfuller is correct about what Aslan represents in the books. So I do have a disliking for making such a change to the character. I am not performing a damn thing here. I am conveying my opinion, same as you with all your not-so-subtle insults directed at those who come to different positions on movies.
Reply Quote
5
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Murder Hornet • 9:07p, 10/12/26
AG
Murder Hornet said:
TCTTS said:
I totally get not liking the idea of it. Rather, it's the performative anger from grown men on a message board, before seeing a frame of the movie itself, that I find dumb/hilarious.


TC, I generally like you and you bring lots to this board but this is an example of your condescension

Why does it have to be performative anger that people point out some questionable casting choices and creative decisions?

So far all we have are articles; nothing has been seen. However, people have opinions and given the obvious political leanings of the director and the original source material, perhaps what you perceive as performative outrage are legitimate concerns for a very well known and well loved story.

My opinion based solely on what has been discussed so far…at some point being transgressive just for the sake of being transgressive is incredibly tiresome


Again, expressing concern and questioning casting choices are totally valid, but completely different than proudly claiming, before seeing even a frame of the movie, that you're not going to see it. The latter of which is an objectively performative act. Simply expressing concern is not. Express concern all you want, share your opinions, etc. That's not what I'm taking issue with.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:35a, 10/13/26
AG
The Mosquito Bowl
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt36413910/
October 30, 2026 = Theatrical Limited
November 25, 2026 = Netflix

Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:35a, 10/13/26
AG
A Dog's Perfect Christmas
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt38515310/
November 4, 2026 = Netflix

Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:36a, 10/13/26
AG
Being Heumann
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15095848/
November 06, 2026 = Theatrical Limited
November 13, 2026 = Apple TV

Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:36a, 10/13/26
AG
Godzilla Minus Zero
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt34384661/
November 6, 2026 = Theatrical Wide / IMAX

Reply Quote
1
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:36a, 10/13/26
AG
Hexed
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt38077943/
November 25, 2026 = Theatrical Wide

Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:36a, 10/13/26
AG
River
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt33085567/
January 15, 2027 = Theatrical Wide

Reply Quote
Cinco Ranch Aggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 6:34a
AG
TCTTS said:
Murder Hornet said:
TCTTS said:
I totally get not liking the idea of it. Rather, it's the performative anger from grown men on a message board, before seeing a frame of the movie itself, that I find dumb/hilarious.


TC, I generally like you and you bring lots to this board but this is an example of your condescension

Why does it have to be performative anger that people point out some questionable casting choices and creative decisions?

So far all we have are articles; nothing has been seen. However, people have opinions and given the obvious political leanings of the director and the original source material, perhaps what you perceive as performative outrage are legitimate concerns for a very well known and well loved story.

My opinion based solely on what has been discussed so far…at some point being transgressive just for the sake of being transgressive is incredibly tiresome


Again, expressing concern and questioning casting choices are totally valid, but completely different than proudly claiming, before seeing even a frame of the movie, that you're not going to see it. The latter of which is an objectively performative act. Simply expressing concern is not. Express concern all you want, share your opinions, etc. That's not what I'm taking issue with.

You have this love for the use of the word 'objective' and its variants when defending your positions - when in fact there is nothing objective about this. This is merely my subjective judgment, i.e., an opinion. You don't like my opinion, and that's perfectly fine.
Reply Quote
2
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cinco Ranch Aggie • 7:05a
AG
Okay? Except I never commented on your opinion, nor was it the aim of my "objective" claim. Again, for the umpteenth time, it's the *act* needing everyone to know that you're not going to see a movie, before seeing a single frame of it, that I was calling "performative." Which is totally different than saying "I don't like your opinion" or "Your opinion is wrong."
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
FL_Ag1998
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 7:23a
AG
TCTTS said:
Okay? Except I never commented on your opinion, nor was it the aim of my "objective" claim. Again, for the umpteenth time, it's the *act* needing everyone to know that you're not going to see a movie, before seeing a single frame of it, that I was calling "performative." Which is totally different than saying "I don't like your opinion" or "Your opinion is wrong."



Ehhhh, here's my stance on this take....IMO, (not going to call it an objective fact, just my opinion), the point of this board is to 1) spread information on Entertainment and 2) share our opinions about it and discuss those opinions.

Now, #2 above can at times get redundant. For example, if 50 other separate posters followed up Cinco's post by posting essentially the same thing, that's kind of silly and performative of them. Ideally, they should just blue star his post as their endorsement and agreement of that opinion.

However, to say it's wrong of him to express his opinion of the trailer and press releases surrounding the movie is well,....wrong in itself. That's the point of movie trailers and pre-release press. The trailers and press are all designed specifically so we can judge whether we want to see the movie or not.

If he's being performative by stating he doesn't plan to see it, then so are the other posters who use their posts to proudly proclaim how open-minded and progressive they are by not being judgemental of it. IMO, performative or not, not only is it OK to share opinions on here, but its essentially the point. Getting scolded on here for sharing a negative opinion of a show, movie, or a trailer is starting to get tiresome.
Reply Quote
3
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FL_Ag1998 • 7:29a
AG
There has been no trailer yet. Not a single second of footage. That's kind of a big part of my argument. Also, I never said he was "wrong." I simply pointed out that it's something he and his ilk constantly do, that I find funny.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
swimmerbabe11
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 7:41a
I actually feel like I really need everyone to know that I won't be watching the wicker basket sex movie.

Thank you for your time and attention.
Reply Quote
2
veryfuller
User Profile
Private Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to swimmerbabe11 • 7:52a
Staff
AG
I don't want to see it, but I do have…questions…
Reply Quote
3
First Page
Page 189 of 190 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.