Had a chance to sleep on it and am still really disappointed with what I saw last night. I think it is going to be difficult for those who read the book to like the film adaptation of Ready Player One. Obviously, the movie had time constraints, which made some of the cuts and changes from the book necessary. Moreover, I think we all knew it was going to be impossible to include all of the pop-culture and nostalgia references that were found in the book. TCTTS mentioned above that the movie was aiming for the jr high demographic, which I believe was the main problem. While this movie was not as 80's-centric as the book, I do question their use of some of the cultural references/games (and even The Shining) that weren't going to connect with their targeted audience.
Here are some of the things I missed/questioned (some possible book spoilers):
- First Key - the change wasn't bad, as the book version was a bit more drawn out. However, the book version did capture more of WW's limitations and made the first reward and pay off mean more. I also enjoyed the hunt for the location of the key, instead of just knowing that the winner of the race gets the first key. The former approach also reinvigorated the search for the Easter Egg, instead of everyone just competing in a race each day. By the way, you mean to tell me after they had access to Halliday's journals that nobody picked up on the whole "drive backwards" thing? Lego video games make their clues more difficult than that.
- Gate challenges - The gate challenges were great in the books, but I understand the need to cut some of those out.
- New character stories - It was lazy writing that they all lived near each other, especially with Daito and Shoto. Aech's reveal/twist didn't feel as big as it was in the book (maybe that's on me because I knew it was coming) and changing Daito and Shoto up was a mistake. Also, I think Ogg was grossly underutilized, and preferred the book version/character.
- Sorrento - I was excited to see Mendelsohn here, but he was a shell of the ruthless and desperate antagonist book version. Bossman69?? I foresee a new TexAgs handle soon.
- IR0K - I do think this character's importance was increased over the book (for the better), but I'm shocked TJ Miller was still a part of this movie. I figured that could've been an easy recast, as it was only his voice.
- The Love Story - this was hurried and not fleshed out well.
- Lack of real world implications - as mentioned earlier, there was too much time spent in the Oasis and not enough time in the real world for us to care about the actual people vs. the avatars. Some of the above changes/differences made the final "We're Not Gonna Take It" (cheese) battle seem forced rather than out of necessity.
Maybe a lot of this came down to the fact that there was a lot of source material that couldn't fit into one movie. Do you think it would've helped things if this was a two-parter instead of just one movie?
TL; DR - If you read the book, lower your expectations and go in with more of an open mind.