That's fair I guess. In my mind, there is very little the writers could have done to make her killing all those innocents make sense. Not in the short amount of time they gave themselves anyway.
Quote:
Crazy or not she was hell bent on one thing and never letting anything stand in her way.
bobinator said:I don't get how you watch this show and are okay with this. This show spent YEARS building up these complicated characters, imperfect heroes, imperfect villains, etc, etc.gambochaman said:
i think she had made up her mind to **ck **it up before the battle even started...it was evident ALL ALONG. what more reasons did you want them to give you? She realized she was alone...that someone else had a better claim to the throne...that even her trusted advisors had betrayed her...that yet another man she loved had spurned her...she even SAYS IT...'FEAR IT IS THEN'
waiting for the bells to ring was the ultimate EFF YOU...it was not what drove her mad...she was already there...it was to drive home her fury...wait until the city surrenders, then torch it anyway
it was perfect, and brutal, and genius, and awesome
And now, at the very end, one of the central characters just goes ALL THE WAY off the deep end. Not only killing innocent people, but doing it out of spite?
That's not ruling out of fear, that's just killing everybody.
Anakin Skywalker's turn to the dark side was better written.
Fenrir said:
Ned's army took KL I'm fairly certain.
bobinator said:
This 'rule by fear' thing is the lazy bit.
She could have ruled by fear by simply melting the red keep for everyone to see. Or taking the city and then killing everyone wearing Lannister armor.
But instead she goes all the way to 'I need to kill everyone in this city' which again to me is just lazy. They laid such complicated groundwork for this character, and then at the end she goes completely off the deep end for no particular reason.
No they aren't.Champ Bailey said:bobinator said:
This 'rule by fear' thing is the lazy bit.
She could have ruled by fear by simply melting the red keep for everyone to see. Or taking the city and then killing everyone wearing Lannister armor.
But instead she goes all the way to 'I need to kill everyone in this city' which again to me is just lazy. They laid such complicated groundwork for this character, and then at the end she goes completely off the deep end for no particular reason.
No particular reason? The reasonings are 8 seasons in the making.
FIDO95 said:
Shocked to see so many complaints about Dany going mad queen. If you thought it was going to end well, you haven't been paying attention.
bobinator said:Quote:
Crazy or not she was hell bent on one thing and never letting anything stand in her way.
That's my whole issue though. The one thing she's hell bent on is now hers, and nobody is in her way, and she turns away from it just to kill everyone.
It's not really that killing those people was unnecessary, it's that it delayed her getting the thing she wants.
They built those whole thing up with subtle steps. That's why it was inevitable. An eight-year slow turn to this. And then, in that moment... that's it?
It just felt lazy by the writers.
aTmAg said:No they aren't.Champ Bailey said:bobinator said:
This 'rule by fear' thing is the lazy bit.
She could have ruled by fear by simply melting the red keep for everyone to see. Or taking the city and then killing everyone wearing Lannister armor.
But instead she goes all the way to 'I need to kill everyone in this city' which again to me is just lazy. They laid such complicated groundwork for this character, and then at the end she goes completely off the deep end for no particular reason.
No particular reason? The reasonings are 8 seasons in the making.
swc93 said:
BTW what happened to winter? When Jaime left KL last season it was starting to snow.
But that's her singular obsession. She wants to attack as soon as possible, she didn't want to wait to regroup the army in the north, she wants it, NOW.Zombie Jon Snow said:
I also don't get how you think it delayed her getting what she wanted - it happened still, and it happened that same day. You mean a few hours delay? Maybe. But in the context of her entire life it wasn't a delay. She won it that day.
I thought Grey Worm was more disappointed in Jon for not immediately following his Queen's lead; not disappointed that peace wasn't happening. He looked to be out for revenge for his lady's death.bobinator said:
That's not at all what happened.
Once Grey Worm saw that she was attacking the people, he knew there wasn't going to be a peace, and so he threw the spear. He also seemed disappointed in what happened.
Plus I think the writers said in the after episode that she decided to do it right then.
This part was okay to me. Dany out-Cersei'd Cersei.Agnzona said:
I'm I the only one that had a problem that Cersi had no plan, no double or triple cross? That she meekly gave in? That's not the Cersi we know?
And she's not, she took it upon herself to burn the city vs a pyromancer and some wildfire.JABQ04 said:
But she also told Barristan Selmy she's not her father after he came clean about how much of a POS he was.
Please. They? The civilians didn't murder her entire family. They didn't kill all her friends and her "children". They didn't make her brother bang Jon's mom. None of this comes close to explain why she'd burn a million civilians after the battle is won.Champ Bailey said:aTmAg said:No they aren't.Champ Bailey said:bobinator said:
This 'rule by fear' thing is the lazy bit.
She could have ruled by fear by simply melting the red keep for everyone to see. Or taking the city and then killing everyone wearing Lannister armor.
But instead she goes all the way to 'I need to kill everyone in this city' which again to me is just lazy. They laid such complicated groundwork for this character, and then at the end she goes completely off the deep end for no particular reason.
No particular reason? The reasonings are 8 seasons in the making.
These people have benefitted off the power her ancestors amassed centuries ago after they betrayed them. They murdered her entire family and have tried to kill her since the moment she left Westeros using this power that was stolen from her. She lost all her friends along the way, had sacrificed two of her "children," for this cause, and right at the end it turns out that even her central belief that it was her destiny by right to take the throne was a lie due to Jon.
It has to be rotated and aimed fast enough to lead a dragon flying fast and randomly. Even Cersei said they just needed one "lucky shot". Rhaegal was flying slow and straight. Much easier shot than trying to hit Drogon in full attack mode.Quinn said:The episode showed guys on Euron's boat easily pushing the weapon to face a different direction.Zombie Jon Snow said:aTmAg said:I'll give her the first dive. It's the 20 after that which are a problem, IMO.G Martin 87 said:She dove in from a high angle with the sun at her back. Turns out that Euron wasn't seeing hundreds of baby Drogons (like the more ridiculous theorists suggested from last week's preview), but squinting into the sun unable to be sure what he was seeing.aTmAg said:
Another thing I forgot to mention:
The fact that Dany wiped out the fleet and scorpions so easily was idiotic. Last week Euron's fleet first 3 shots went 3 for 3 from a mile away. They yesterday they looked like storm troopers. I thought they were going to do something smart to win that battle. Like maybe sneak up in the middle of the night and burn the scorpions on one side of the city, and then have Dany approach from that direction or something. But no. This time, she was just really good at flying a dragon and everybody else had really bad aim.
They don't rotate easily at all or adjust angle - they are big lumbering weapons. They had limited tactical ability really. After the first dive once she was swooping and diving through them it was from 20 different angles they could not adjust to on the fly.
aTmAg said:Please. They? The civilians didn't murder her entire family. They didn't kill all her friends and her "children". They didn't make her brother bang Jon's mom. None of this comes close to explain why she'd burn a million civilians after the battle is won.Champ Bailey said:aTmAg said:No they aren't.Champ Bailey said:bobinator said:
This 'rule by fear' thing is the lazy bit.
She could have ruled by fear by simply melting the red keep for everyone to see. Or taking the city and then killing everyone wearing Lannister armor.
But instead she goes all the way to 'I need to kill everyone in this city' which again to me is just lazy. They laid such complicated groundwork for this character, and then at the end she goes completely off the deep end for no particular reason.
No particular reason? The reasonings are 8 seasons in the making.
These people have benefitted off the power her ancestors amassed centuries ago after they betrayed them. They murdered her entire family and have tried to kill her since the moment she left Westeros using this power that was stolen from her. She lost all her friends along the way, had sacrificed two of her "children," for this cause, and right at the end it turns out that even her central belief that it was her destiny by right to take the throne was a lie due to Jon.
GRRM may have better explained it (in books or his mind), but the show sure as hell didn't.
Kaiser Soze comes to mind, "You just need the will to do what the other guy wouldn't."bobinator said:This part was okay to me. Dany out-Cersei'd Cersei.Agnzona said:
I'm I the only one that had a problem that Cersi had no plan, no double or triple cross? That she meekly gave in? That's not the Cersi we know?
There's no way to have someone betray her, because she doesn't trust anyone anymore.
I actually thought that arc was fine.
And so she kills a million civilians, that had nothing to do with any of that, after the battle is won?Champ Bailey said:aTmAg said:Please. They? The civilians didn't murder her entire family. They didn't kill all her friends and her "children". They didn't make her brother bang Jon's mom. None of this comes close to explain why she'd burn a million civilians after the battle is won.Champ Bailey said:aTmAg said:No they aren't.Champ Bailey said:bobinator said:
This 'rule by fear' thing is the lazy bit.
She could have ruled by fear by simply melting the red keep for everyone to see. Or taking the city and then killing everyone wearing Lannister armor.
But instead she goes all the way to 'I need to kill everyone in this city' which again to me is just lazy. They laid such complicated groundwork for this character, and then at the end she goes completely off the deep end for no particular reason.
No particular reason? The reasonings are 8 seasons in the making.
These people have benefitted off the power her ancestors amassed centuries ago after they betrayed them. They murdered her entire family and have tried to kill her since the moment she left Westeros using this power that was stolen from her. She lost all her friends along the way, had sacrificed two of her "children," for this cause, and right at the end it turns out that even her central belief that it was her destiny by right to take the throne was a lie due to Jon.
GRRM may have better explained it (in books or his mind), but the show sure as hell didn't.
She talks about it at Winterfell when she sees Jon getting all the love for riding her dragons. She feels ostracized and separated from the people, even though they would have all died without her. And they don't giver her any credit for it.