I have a use for you.
Tom Hardy is VENOM
39,009 Views |
323 Replies |
Last: 1 mo ago by Tanya 93
jjmanzano said:Bane sounded like Celebrity Jeopardy Sean Connery. I chuckled the first few times he spoke.GoAgs92 said:
I wonder what incomprehensible accent he will use....
Major bummer. This also means we won't see a faithful Spider-Man symbiote saga on film anytime soon. The material from the comic arc could easily create a ton of dough for Sony through several movies.
Spitballing:
1. Spider-Man Homecoming
1b. References to the symbiote in the galactic part of the MCU
2. Spider-Man standalone movie with Eddie Brock in the cast of characters. Peter and Mary Jane fully established.
3. Black Spider-Man arc, ending with Brock getting the symbiote. End credit scene that reveals Venom
4. Spidey vs Venom movie that references Cletus Kassidy
5a. Post-black Spider-Man movie
5b. Venom anti-hero movie
6. Spidey and Venom vs Carnage movie
Dammit, Sony.
Spitballing:
1. Spider-Man Homecoming
1b. References to the symbiote in the galactic part of the MCU
2. Spider-Man standalone movie with Eddie Brock in the cast of characters. Peter and Mary Jane fully established.
3. Black Spider-Man arc, ending with Brock getting the symbiote. End credit scene that reveals Venom
4. Spidey vs Venom movie that references Cletus Kassidy
5a. Post-black Spider-Man movie
5b. Venom anti-hero movie
6. Spidey and Venom vs Carnage movie
Dammit, Sony.
Given the things that will be lacking/changed in this story, I think I'd rather see Tom Hardy play Wolverine.
The insane theory that Life was a Venom film was a better idea than the Brock intro.
Not sure there'd ever be a 6-movie saga of any super hero with one actor. The release dates are too far apart right to make it likely, right? With how big and expensive they make these movies nowadays?
Guess Iron Man is close to counting, even though he's not the sole main character in every outing. I think that is more of a product of the perfect storm between Downey as Stark.
Guess Iron Man is close to counting, even though he's not the sole main character in every outing. I think that is more of a product of the perfect storm between Downey as Stark.
Am I the only one who liked the first few spiderman movies with McGuire? I thought he did a good job portraying what is supposed to be an awkward nerdy kid. Not a "nerdy" kid. And I liked Willem Dafoe as Norman Osborne.
The third movie did screw up Venom and tried to throw too much into a single movie. I know everyone complained about Peter when he was in the black suit but I thought it was perfect. He wasnt supposed to be "cool." He was supposed to be a cocky version of his awkward nerdy self who thinks he is "cool." And to that end I though he did that part pretty well.
Oh, and I liked Kirsten dunst as Mary Jane. Not bc of her stellar acting but bc I liked her as a redhead.
Flame away.
The third movie did screw up Venom and tried to throw too much into a single movie. I know everyone complained about Peter when he was in the black suit but I thought it was perfect. He wasnt supposed to be "cool." He was supposed to be a cocky version of his awkward nerdy self who thinks he is "cool." And to that end I though he did that part pretty well.
Oh, and I liked Kirsten dunst as Mary Jane. Not bc of her stellar acting but bc I liked her as a redhead.
Flame away.
The first one was good. I didn't like any of the others. The civil war Spider-Man isn't bad.
jamaggie06 said:
Am I the only one who liked the first few spiderman movies with McGuire? I thought he did a good job portraying what is supposed to be an awkward nerdy kid. Not a "nerdy" kid. And I liked Willem Dafoe as Norman Osborne.
The third movie did screw up Venom and tried to throw too much into a single movie. I know everyone complained about Peter when he was in the black suit but I thought it was perfect. He wasnt supposed to be "cool." He was supposed to be a cocky version of his awkward nerdy self who thinks he is "cool." And to that end I though he did that part pretty well.
Oh, and I liked Kirsten dunst as Mary Jane. Not bc of her stellar acting but bc I liked her as a redhead.
Flame away.
I still rank the second one as on of my top ten superhero movies. Doc Ock is one of my favorite super villains though.
Slight derail, why is superhero one word, but super villain is two?
mcu Peter Parker is the type of pp I imagined.schmendeler said:
The first one was good. I didn't like any of the others. The civil war Spider-Man isn't bad.
I just can't imagine that if it's successful that Disney and Sony wouldn't work out a way to share the characters. I mean, Disney is lending Sony Iron Man this summer.
I liked Bane's voice. I use it around the house to torment my wife.
"When you finish the dishes, only then do you have permission to watch Gilmore Girls"YouBet said:
I liked Bane's voice. I use it around the house to torment my wife.
amercer said:
I just can't imagine that if it's successful that Disney and Sony wouldn't work out a way to share the characters. I mean, Disney is lending Sony Iron Man this summer.
That's a Marvel movie, regardless of what the title screen will say. It seems clear to me that Sony has had nothing to do with its development.
I think Spiderman 2 > SM1 = ASM1 > ASM2 > SM3.
I love spiderman so I enjoyed all of them, but the villains in ASM2 and SM3 were pretty terrible and the Emo scenes just ... sigh*
I do however think that the chemistry between Garfield and Stone was the best part of all of the films. Despite the villains being horrible in that movie they did her death well.
I was also really excited when I opened this thread and then became baffled as to how this movie happens without spidey.
I love spiderman so I enjoyed all of them, but the villains in ASM2 and SM3 were pretty terrible and the Emo scenes just ... sigh*
I do however think that the chemistry between Garfield and Stone was the best part of all of the films. Despite the villains being horrible in that movie they did her death well.
I was also really excited when I opened this thread and then became baffled as to how this movie happens without spidey.
Still very confusing. I guess they'll use the MCU to boost up this side universe, but the side universe doesn't count as MCU.
Watch the video......Kevin Feige doesn't really look on board with this. He smiles once, but otherwise looks just as confused as us as to what this woman's saying.
And there's still no guarantee that Holland will appear in ANY of these spin-off movies; she just confirms that they "take place in the same universe" which means basically nothing. It means Sony is desperate for some of the MCU cash.
And seriously....why is this woman in charge of anything anymore? This is the woman who threatened the world with endless "Ghostbusters" reboot sequels because that movie is going to be the biggest movie of 2016.
And there's still no guarantee that Holland will appear in ANY of these spin-off movies; she just confirms that they "take place in the same universe" which means basically nothing. It means Sony is desperate for some of the MCU cash.
And seriously....why is this woman in charge of anything anymore? This is the woman who threatened the world with endless "Ghostbusters" reboot sequels because that movie is going to be the biggest movie of 2016.
I really, really wish Disney could somehow get control of all of these characters away from Sony and Fox.
Rex Racer said:
I really, really wish Disney could somehow get control of all of these characters away from Sony and Fox.
Cant Disney just trade them Pirates or something for Spider Man straight up?
Spider-man 2 is a damn good superhero movie. Probably a top 3 for me, alongside The Dark Knight and the first Iron Man movie.
This thread keeps making me happy and sad and confused all at the same time.
If spiderman is a part of this I'll be there day one... if not I may not watch it at all.
If spiderman is a part of this I'll be there day one... if not I may not watch it at all.
I read Carnage is going to be the villain for this movie. I'm curious who they will cast.
MrPlow2010 said:
I read Carnage is going to be the villain for this movie. I'm curious who they will cast.
Daniel Day Lewis
I would hate to be on set as he gets into character. Might have a few dead cameramen.
ok soooooo... how are they going to do an origin story of Venom without Spidey let alone have Carnage in this movie without properly doing an origin story of Venom?
rhutton125
Joined:
Apr 11, 2007
Posts:
10,925
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They just need to distract them long enough for the rights to revert back to Marvel. Convince them the real money will be in the Smurfs franchise, or a Ghost Rider reboot.Sex Panther said:Rex Racer said:
I really, really wish Disney could somehow get control of all of these characters away from Sony and Fox.
Cant Disney just trade them Pirates or something for Spider Man straight up?
dromo07 said:
ok soooooo... how are they going to do an origin story of Venom without Spidey let alone have Carnage in this movie without properly doing an origin story of Venom?
This just keeps getting worse and worse, but I guess every franchise needs to have their "Batman & Robin" to wake the studio up as to how bad their ideas are....
not sure if you noticed but this is in the MCU spiderman's universe, just not officially in the MCU. I think you could start the movie with Spiderman shedding the venom suit and it finding Brock, or even have it being the first act of the movie.
Regardless there is some awesome comic movie potential with this movie:
Regardless there is some awesome comic movie potential with this movie:
It just seems so... vague... at this point. IS Tom Holland appearing in this? Because nobody can seem to agree on that and he's not contractually obligated, as far as I'm aware. And does Disney want them using their universe to launch an unofficial side universe? Could they do anything about it anyway?
Spidey side-verse without Spidey = dumb
Unofficial MCU side-verse with MCU Spidey but not recognized by other films = confusing
Spidey villains and characters being used and kept out of the MCU = a shame
Seems like a loss all around.
Spidey side-verse without Spidey = dumb
Unofficial MCU side-verse with MCU Spidey but not recognized by other films = confusing
Spidey villains and characters being used and kept out of the MCU = a shame
Seems like a loss all around.
They should do the Flash Thompson Venom just for kicks
Featured Stories
See All
Lone Star Showdown revival pits Aggies vs. Longhorns as SEC rivals
by Olin Buchanan
2025 Cocoa (FL) quarterback Brady Hart commits to Texas A&M
by Ryan Brauninger
6:42
14h ago
1.7k
44:52
17h ago
3.1k
7:40
18h ago
2.5k
Infection_Ag11
All of the stats, analytics and the eye test says Texas should win by 10+
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
16