Ha, it's Q&A overload. Next Saturday is a La La Land screening with the director "and friends" which likely means at least either Emma Stone or Ryan Gosling, if not both.
The REAL reason for the scene is that the first version of the script had to invent a motivation for the Heptapods to visit Earth. The short story doesn't give any reason for their journey.HerschelwoodHardhead said:
It's been a week since I've seen it, but IIRC that scene has the aliens give a large data dump of symbols which is incoherent. Fortunately, Jeremy Renner the scientist decodes it and figures out that when you sum the surface area of the plot there is 0.083333 area covered by "text" and the rest is blank space. That is 1/12, which is a clue that it's only one twelfth of the info and we need to communicate with the other countries to understand their language.
The REAL reason for that scene is we needed a reason why a theoretical physicist was invited to these alien sessions and we had to see him contributing. For Hollywood, arithmetic is about the most complex form of math you can explain on screen and so the puzzle he solved had to be simple enough to show in ten seconds. Honestly, I thought that part and the bomb scene were both a little clunky, but easily overlooked in what otherwise was a very good movie.
Great movie, and obama would have drawn a "red line" and then ignored it.........right?DSAg44 said:
saw last night. trump would have blasted those monsters within an hour.
yep, they would have realized how weak we were and destroyed us immediately. Maybe Putin to save the day.CyclingAg82 said:Great movie, and obama would have drawn a "red line" and then ignored it.........right?DSAg44 said:
saw last night. trump would have blasted those monsters within an hour.
LCE said:
Maybe I fell asleep, but did either one of the main characters get pissed they almost got killed after the explosion?
lunchbox said:
finally saw the movie tonight and my first reaction was that i was bothered by the fact that at the beginning of the movie, Louise appeared to have flashbacks of a daughter who had died. Then we find out it is a future daughter. If she has some gift for seeing the future, why doesn't she have any flash-front memories of the aliens or the ships?
Then, I came up with my theory...and I apologize if someone on this thread had it first...I just skimmed around and I haven't looked elsewhere...
She isn't having flash-forward memories at the beginning of the film.
The film is circular just like the heptapod language...we, the audience just happen to see the end of the movie at the beginning. It would have traditionally begun with her arriving to campus with all the kids watching TV and then carried on from there and ended with the daughter dying. The film we see ends with them about to conceive and starts with her and a baby. All we miss out on is the pregnancy.
Bunk Moreland said:
I was really looking forward to it, but it came out as just above average for me.
I didn't know know much at all about it going in (as far as spoilers go), and I figured out they were flash forwarding early on but didn't tie it to the language till just before the reveal.
I think it was clunky, incredibly cheesy at times, and I feel like they should have focused way more on Adams/Renner and their story.
I think it was shot beautifully, dealt with a very interesting concept with deep themes to examine, but in the end I think it got in the way of itself too much. I liked as many aspects as I didn't.
Good movie, worth the watch, but definitely not an all-timer.
.02
AGinHI said:
They're just standing there until Louise arrives (Arrival).
Human
Louise
Louise walking
All initiated by the inferior species.
given our story, is also possible and one I would expect from the more advanced race (see Amazon reference above).Quote:
they don't have a good reference point for how we think and use language. To that end, it's necessary that we explain our language and reasoning system to them, to establish a baseline for further cooperation.