quote:Ilyn or Podrick?
Payne isn't really important so he could die somehow too
quote:Ilyn or Podrick?
Payne isn't really important so he could die somehow too
quote:He tried to kill a little boy in season 1. He's changed a lot since then, but he will still do anything for his sister - I do think that's real. His journey with Brienne and losing his hand changed him and made him realize what he could be vs what he is, but I also think that returning home to have two of his children murdered - in front of him! - by political enemies has made him realize anew that you win or you die. I hated to see him go Full Lannister (even more so in the book) but he probably doesn't feel like he has a lot of alternatives. By threatening to kill a baby - and honestly, by actually killing the baby if need be - he took a mighty castle with minimal casualties on both sides. The only victim was his honor and it's been made clear to him that no one thinks he has any honor anyway, except Brienne. And he wants to get home to his sister and his only surviving child.
But do we think that New Jaime would actually have killed the baby? I do not. It was a bluff
quote:quote:But do we think that New Jaime would actually have killed the baby? I do not. It was a bluffquote:i agree. i think they are showing the crowd that Jamie is as ruthless as ever.quote:I think the Riverrun sequence was all just character building for Jamie.
Riverrun sequence was useless.
quote:quote:He tried to kill a little boy in season 1. He's changed a lot since then, but he will still do anything for his sister - I do think that's real. His journey with Brienne and losing his hand changed him and made him realize what he could be vs what he is, but I also think that returning home to have two of his children murdered - in front of him! - by political enemies has made him realize anew that you win or you die. I hated to see him go Full Lannister (even more so in the book) but he probably doesn't feel like he has a lot of alternatives. By threatening to kill a baby - and honestly, by actually killing the baby if need be - he took a mighty castle with minimal casualties on both sides. The only victim was his honor and it's been made clear to him that no one thinks he has any honor anyway, except Brienne. And he wants to get home to his sister and his only surviving child.
But do we think that New Jaime would actually have killed the baby? I do not. It was a bluff
Regarding the trial - I wonder if this is a precurser to the Tyrells demanding a Trial of Seven for Loras, since that is also sacred to the gods, and counting on Cersei not being able to find seven champions (while Loras quite obviously could). I just have a hard time believing that these trials won't involve some massive spectacle.
quote:That was my thought too, but maybe there's a theological argument to be made that seven warriors would honor the gods - I could see Margery trying this angle with the High Sparrow to help Loras. It's just a thought - like I said, it's hard to see how a trial in front of seven septons would be anything more than a boring show trial.
Isn't the trial of seven outlawed as well? It's a trial by combat featuring 7v7 so if 1v1 is out how can 7v7 not be?
quote:quote:just go back a couple of pages to the "that's not Rickon, it's Arya!"
There doesn't seem to be as much room for crazy theories this week, so we are going to have some forum battles.
Eta: nothing wrong with crazy theories, imo. I just thought this was way out of left field.
quote:Jaime did say last week "only a fool makes a threat he's not ready to follow through with".quote:But do we think that New Jaime would actually have killed the baby? I do not. It was a bluffquote:i agree. i think they are showing the crowd that Jamie is as ruthless as ever.quote:I think the Riverrun sequence was all just character building for Jamie.
Riverrun sequence was useless.
quote:
Question for the book readers: is there any smoke to the HS being HR theory? From the show's perspective, this theory is borderline ludicrous. The HS is decades older than Ned was and I would expect HR to be approximately the same age as Ned. Not to mention the HS's story about being a cobbler doesn't add up at all and he doesn't really have a lot of incentive to make that story up.
quote:quote:The "little birds" are spies, not cellar spelunkers. The secret is not the wildfire, but something else.
I think Qyburn found the wildfire reserves.
quote:The birds found out that the High Sparrow stabbed Ser Arthur Dayne in the back like a coward.quote:The "little birds" are spies, not cellar spelunkers. The secret is not the wildfire, but something else.
I think Qyburn found the wildfire reserves.
quote:
Question for the book readers: is there any smoke to the HS being HR theory? From the show's perspective, this theory is borderline ludicrous. The HS is decades older than Ned was and I would expect HR to be approximately the same age as Ned. Not to mention the HS's story about being a cobbler doesn't add up at all and he doesn't really have a lot of incentive to make that story up.
quote:
Just watched the last two eps. This show is dumb. Motivations and actions of characters have stopped making any kind of sense.
quote:
And here I was thinking that I was the only one who thinks Martin isn't a very good writer, just great at shock factor which makes for great TV.
quote:That is how I read them.
I really enjoyed books 1-3. Book 4 was mostly tedious, occasionally punctuated by something interesting. Overall book 5 was ok, a lot better than 4 but nothing close to 1-3. Had 4 & 5 been combined & cut down to 1s length it might have been good.
That said 1-3 while enjoyable are not in my top ten favorite fictional books. Hell they are not my favorite Sci-fi/fantasy books & most of my fiction is Tom Clancy style over the top thrillers.
quote:
Question for the book readers: is there any smoke to the HS being HR theory? From the show's perspective, this theory is borderline ludicrous. The HS is decades older than Ned was and I would expect HR to be approximately the same age as Ned. Not to mention the HS's story about being a cobbler doesn't add up at all and he doesn't really have a lot of incentive to make that story up.
quote:
"...doesn't have any strong evidence and is pretty implausible in a bunch of ways. There are some tantalizing facts that "kinda" back it up but all those factors are still compatible with the simpler one, that Howland Reed is still in the North and that the High Sparrow is just what he seems"."
quote:
"The biggest problem is it doesn't make sense as a plan. For the theory to be true Howland must have sat down during the war and with winter coming and decided that the best plan of action was for him to go wandering through the Riverlands on foot performing religious ceremonies for a foreign religion (keep in mind he is of the old gods, and would have to have studied the faith of the seven diligently to pull this off) until he manages to become the leader of a popular uprising and then become the High Septon a position with sufficient power to strike at the crown...all the while hiding his identity and faking faith. Like seriously????"
quote:quote:http://boiledleather.com/post/25902554148/a-new-readerfriendly-combined-reading-order-for-a
back to back?
quote:Do we know it's Dorne?
Varys - Softening the ground for Daenerys by allying with Dorne.
quote:The little birds have filled the role of spies, kidnappers, assassins, and could easily be reached out to for other tasks. Orphans like them some food.
The "little birds" are spies, not cellar spelunkers. The secret is not the wildfire, but something else.