Entertainment
Sponsored by

Anybody else like to pretend Star Wars episodes 1-3 never happened?

11,252 Views | 133 Replies | Last: 11 yr ago by wesag
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I wasn't a big fan of the prequals either and I was 10 when Episode 1 came out, but Darth Maul was the most badass character in the whole series IMO


...and in true Sith fashion he gets killed after taunting while his enemy is dangling above a bottomless pit.
Ulrich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The prequels are bad movies.

Ep VI had some weaknesses, namely Ewoks, but it had enough good combined with the greatness of IV and V to be part of a great trilogy.

The prequels ran out of reflected glory somewhere around "ARE YOU AN ANGEL?" The storytelling was bad, the characters were bad, the directing was bad which resulted in bad acting from good actors, there were too many stupid goofy things directed at selling merchandise to little kids, and the CGI was lol over the top.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Learn the episode numbers. Kthx.
Ulrich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To whom are you directing that comment?
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To you.
Ulrich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Typo :/ But my point stands.


BigTimeAlum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I watched 4 &5 with my boys over the holiday. I just wish he and the writers had re-watched their damn movies before they wrote those stories. Huge inconsistencies between the back story given in 4 and what happened in 1-3.

How I would have done it:
Episode 1 - The Clone Wars
Ditch Quigon (sp) - Episode 1 should have been an Obi wan Kenobi movie
Centuries of peace have been broken by a separatist movement that is opposed to the huge bueracrasy that the Republic has become. Wars has broken out and the Republic has turned to clones to build an army quickly. Have Kenobi end up on Tantooine and meet a teenage Anakin who is just a farmer living with his family, including his brother Owen. Anakin can be a dreamer, rebellious, etc. And you have a ton of parallels starting between father/son Ep 1/Ep 4.

Episode 2 - The Chosen One
The Anakin Sywalker movie. If you wanted a "prophesy". Here you go. Anakin is leading a star fighter force. Great Pilot, etc. Jedi council starts realizing how powerful he is. Major Battle X......

Episode 3 - Rise of the Empire
Clone Wars taking their toll. Much death and destruction. Anakin begins losing faith and building a friendship with sympathetic politician Palpatine. Erosion to the Dark side, big Jedi battle Yoda, Emperor, Obiwon, Anakin. Darth Vader is born. Balance is brought to the force (2 Jedi / 2 Sith).





wesag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've heard CG criticism and certainly that was true of that battle in Phantom Menace, but i've also read that quite a lot of modeling was used for many scenes. The prequels weren't as tangible, no, but the lack of great characters like HanSolo really did them in. matter of fact, without Han, Star Wars would be seriously degraded.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Learn the episode numbers. Kthx.


So that would be

Null
V
vi
I
ii
iiI

I trust you won't refer to star wars as "episode iv" or "a new hope" or anything other than "star wars" and it is revenge not return of the jedi.


And if due to the events of the prequels and the dialog of star wars, the most bad ass character in the galaxy is grand moff tarkin. I mean he wasn't even force sensitive and he mother fing kept Darth Vader on a leash.

elfurioso92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've gotten to the point where I choose to ignore the prequels. For a story that Lucas wanted to tell for so long it seemed like he only spent about three days working on
the scripts. Unlike the originals, I like the prequels less and less with each viewing.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I've heard CG criticism and certainly that was true of that battle in Phantom Menace, but i've also read that quite a lot of modeling was used for many scenes. The prequels weren't as tangible, no, but the lack of great characters like HanSolo really did them in. matter of fact, without Han, Star Wars would be seriously degraded.
This is exactly what the prequels needed. A character like Han would've gone a long way to make those movies more fun, in the style of the originals.

Like I said, I like them all and they're all Star Wars, but there is definitely a noticeable shift in tone between the trilogies, and I think the biggest reason is the lack of a a cynical, wise-cracking character like Han.
sayas2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
quote:
Jedi was the only movie I ever saw in the theaters (born in 78) and I didn't have any problems with the Ewoks. I even watched the Ewok Adventure every time I visited my grandparents (I had the cool grandpa that had one of them brand new VHS players and he recorded it!!!!!!).

And now I have a 4 year old that has never seen the non-special edition original trilogy as well as the prequals... and he loves them all.

That's the problem with the Ewoks. I am couple years younger and didn't have a problem with them at the time. And I watched the Ewok movies with that little blonde girl and her 80s headband as well, and enjoyed them. But my level of understanding of Star Wars was : Spaceships! Lasers! PEW-PEW!

But, then I grew up, and now I appreciate them differently than when I was wearing out our VHS in the 80s. Empire Strikes Back went from being my least favorite to the best. They were great movies beyond what can be understood by a five year old. To me, the Ewoks are a bigger symbol of Lucas losing the plot than Jar-Jar because he should have known better back then. Jar-Jar was one bad character in the movie full of forced CGI, midoclorians, stiff acting, poor story.... AT-STs taken out by teddy bears in hang gliders? If a race that worships C-3PO can beat the Empire it takes away from the rag-tag rebels beating the juggernaut. They're the worst part of the originals.

I don't care that Michael Bay is systematically trying to destroy the rest of my childhood nostalgia because I would never watch Transformers or Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles today- they were never good. That's why the prequels evoke such strong emotion, we know what should have been.
COOL LASER FALCON
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Compare the Star Wars prequels to the Planet of the Apes prequels. Episodes 1-3 are completely dependent on the originals. The entire story revolves around the little plot points and details that Lucas put into the original (which is good writing). They are strictly a means to an end.

Compare that to Dawn and Rise of the Planet of the Apes which hold up as independent movies while still moving things towards the eventual end that we already know.
sayas2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have never seen the new Planet of the Apes movies, and don't have much of a desire to.

But, most prequels have problems that are systematic to the nature of the story telling. You're forced to tell your story inside the bounds created by a random lines in the original source material. They HAD to have clones in some fashion because they were already called the clone wars. Since the droids were essentially the narrators of the entire story they HAD to be in the prequels. It becomes forced. Obviously George Lucas completely botched Episodes 1-3 to the point I watched them each once, in the theater and have never tried them again, but he was already behind the eight ball just by the nature of trying to tell a prequel.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I have never seen the new Planet of the Apes movies, and don't have much of a desire to.

But, most prequels have problems that are systematic to the nature of the story telling. You're forced to tell your story inside the bounds created by a random lines in the original source material. They HAD to have clones in some fashion because they were already called the clone wars. Since the droids were essentially the narrators of the entire story they HAD to be in the prequels. It becomes forced. Obviously George Lucas completely botched Episodes 1-3 to the point I watched them each once, in the theater and have never tried them again, but he was already behind the eight ball just by the nature of trying to tell a prequel.


Random timelines? It was all carefully plotted out 30+ years ago when lucas wrote the entire story including the pod races and the incestuous relationship between luke and leia and the idea that Vader went from the second most powerful being in the galaxy to a lap dog of a regional commander back to the 2nd most powerful being in the galaxy and Jabba going from human to alien. /Brian
The Debt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I watched 4 &5 with my boys over the holiday. I just wish he and the writers had re-watched their damn movies before they wrote those stories. Huge inconsistencies between the back story given in 4 and what happened in 1-3.

How I would have done it:
Episode 1 - The Clone Wars
Ditch Quigon (sp) - Episode 1 should have been an Obi wan Kenobi movie
Centuries of peace have been broken by a separatist movement that is opposed to the huge bueracrasy that the Republic has become. Wars has broken out and the Republic has turned to clones to build an army quickly. Have Kenobi end up on Tantooine and meet a teenage Anakin who is just a farmer living with his family, including his brother Owen. Anakin can be a dreamer, rebellious, etc. And you have a ton of parallels starting between father/son Ep 1/Ep 4.

Episode 2 - The Chosen One
The Anakin Sywalker movie. If you wanted a "prophesy". Here you go. Anakin is leading a star fighter force. Great Pilot, etc. Jedi council starts realizing how powerful he is. Major Battle X......

Episode 3 - Rise of the Empire
Clone Wars taking their toll. Much death and destruction. Anakin begins losing faith and building a friendship with sympathetic politician Palpatine. Erosion to the Dark side, big Jedi battle Yoda, Emperor, Obiwon, Anakin. Darth Vader is born. Balance is brought to the force (2 Jedi / 2 Sith).



It would have been decent except that Lucas needs "universe altering war" to be the climax of every film. He did it in Ep 1 and 2, and they were by far the weakest movies of the prequel trilogy. Ironically the best films in each trilogy were the ones where there was no epic battle scene. (Ep3 prequels, ep 5 originals).

I much rather had "The Adventures of Ben and Anakin" for three movies than explaining the rise of the empire, trade wars, pod racing, cloning facilities and their ties to assassins, etc etc. But because Lucas thought himself to be the best at epic stories he had to go big in scope. Just tell the fall of Anakin, it's that simple.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I have never seen the new Planet of the Apes movies, and don't have much of a desire to.

But, most prequels have problems that are systematic to the nature of the story telling. You're forced to tell your story inside the bounds created by a random lines in the original source material. They HAD to have clones in some fashion because they were already called the clone wars. Since the droids were essentially the narrators of the entire story they HAD to be in the prequels. It becomes forced. Obviously George Lucas completely botched Episodes 1-3 to the point I watched them each once, in the theater and have never tried them again, but he was already behind the eight ball just by the nature of trying to tell a prequel.
But Lucas ignored a lot of things set down in the originals. The real big Star Wars nerds have very long lists of contradictions. Many of which are nit picky but some are not.

I don't think he ever cared.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
AT-STs taken out by teddy bears in hang gliders?
From what I remember, the hangliding Ewok didn't take out any AT-STs, only ground troops. The swinging tree trunks and rolling logs were the only successful traps against the walkers.

Now, if you want to complain that the walkers had to conveniently take a path into those traps, ok that's fine. However, the biggest thing the Ewoks did was pull the large number of ground troops into the fray and away from the reactor base, allowing Han and crew to destroy the deflector shield. Just b/c they look cuddly doesn't mean they are useless.
The Debt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Just b/c they look cuddly doesn't mean they are useless.

Unlike our defense.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ouch
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
quote:
I have never seen the new Planet of the Apes movies, and don't have much of a desire to.

But, most prequels have problems that are systematic to the nature of the story telling. You're forced to tell your story inside the bounds created by a random lines in the original source material. They HAD to have clones in some fashion because they were already called the clone wars. Since the droids were essentially the narrators of the entire story they HAD to be in the prequels. It becomes forced. Obviously George Lucas completely botched Episodes 1-3 to the point I watched them each once, in the theater and have never tried them again, but he was already behind the eight ball just by the nature of trying to tell a prequel.


Random timelines? It was all carefully plotted out 30+ years ago when lucas wrote the entire story including the pod races and the incestuous relationship between luke and leia and the idea that Vader went from the second most powerful being in the galaxy to a lap dog of a regional commander back to the 2nd most powerful being in the galaxy and Jabba going from human to alien. /Brian
I know you're going for hyperbole but Jabba was never human.
COOL LASER FALCON
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
quote:
I have never seen the new Planet of the Apes movies, and don't have much of a desire to.

But, most prequels have problems that are systematic to the nature of the story telling. You're forced to tell your story inside the bounds created by a random lines in the original source material. They HAD to have clones in some fashion because they were already called the clone wars. Since the droids were essentially the narrators of the entire story they HAD to be in the prequels. It becomes forced. Obviously George Lucas completely botched Episodes 1-3 to the point I watched them each once, in the theater and have never tried them again, but he was already behind the eight ball just by the nature of trying to tell a prequel.
But Lucas ignored a lot of things set down in the originals. The real big Star Wars nerds have very long lists of contradictions. Many of which are nit picky but some are not.

I don't think he ever cared.
This might have been said, but I think he just tried too hard to make Star Wars prequels instead of making "The Rise and Fall of Anakin Skywalker."

And Sayas, you should really check out the new POTA movies. They're a great example of how to make good prequels.
R0GUE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think it's important that they happened to expose what a fraud George Lucas had become. The backlash he got probably led to him selling the franchise to Disney, which is pretty certain to move the movies forward and out of the gutter they've been in.

Plus, the crappiness of those movies led to a lot of great comedy, like this dude's reviews.
sayas2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I might check out the new Planet of the Apes if they're ever on Netflix and I need to kill a couple of hours. At least for them they have the ability to tell the story of the rise of the apes instead of forced into a single character's backstory. That is where most of the problems with prequels are for me.

oh, and here's human Jabba, like was supposed to be:
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, I just started thinking about how I personally feel about the 3 prequel movies, vs the 2 (soon to be 3) Hobbit movies.

As many issues as I have with the Star Wars prequels, I like them a lot more than the 2 Hobbit movies. I own all 3 prequels and have watched them a bunch over the years. I only own An Unexpected Journey and I'm not sure I've even unwrapped it from the plastic.

That may be a thread or topic all on it's own, but I think it's pretty telling that I get less upset about what Lucas did in 1-3 than what Jackson has done to the Hobbit.
sayas2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
...probably led to him selling the franchise to Disney...

The backlash, and the fact that by selling them the year he did he saved a couple of hundred million in capital gains taxes.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sayas, there's a reason they cut that scene. That dude was never playing Jabba, he was a placeholder. Special effects weren't advanced enough at the time.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
While a pretty lousy director, he's a hell of a businessman
jabberwalkie09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
It would have been decent except that Lucas needs "universe altering war" to be the climax of every film. He did it in Ep 1 and 2, and they were by far the weakest movies of the prequel trilogy. Ironically the best films in each trilogy were the ones where there was no epic battle scene. (Ep3 prequels, ep 5 originals).

I much rather had "The Adventures of Ben and Anakin" for three movies than explaining the rise of the empire, trade wars, pod racing, cloning facilities and their ties to assassins, etc etc. But because Lucas thought himself to be the best at epic stories he had to go big in scope. Just tell the fall of Anakin, it's that simple.
Phantom Menace was pretty much pointless IMO. If you really feel that way, I seriously suggest you watch Ep 2, then the 2008 tv series Star Wars: The Clone Wars (or the 2003 animated series Star Wars: Clone Wars), then Ep 3. The TV series built some on Anakin's frustration with the Order, but didn't always deal with just Kenobi and Skywalker adventures IIRC. The 2008 series, which is admitedly geared more towards children but did grow darker in tone over the show's run, is now canon if I understand correctly and introduced a padawan, Ahsoka Tano, for Anakin. The only reason I bring this up, besides it being in the prequel era of movies, is that the reasons around her departure from the Jedi Order most likely had a profound effect on Anakin's trust and continued frustration with the Council.

Yes I know, the 2008 series was done after Ep 3 and that Ahsoka was not mentioned at all in Ep 3, but it does give a little context for Anakin's view of the council.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Yes I know, the 2008 series was done after Ep 3 and that Ahsoka was not mentioned at all in Ep 3, but it does give a little context for Anakin's view of the council.
This is the one thing that I think Disney will get right. Anything coming from this point forward will likely be laid out in a meaningful timeline (like Agents of Shield and the MCU movies), rather than back filling in gaps. Episode 3 could have been a really great movie if the Clone Wars series had existed before hand to give Anakin some more depth.
jabberwalkie09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
quote:
Yes I know, the 2008 series was done after Ep 3 and that Ahsoka was not mentioned at all in Ep 3, but it does give a little context for Anakin's view of the council.
This is the one thing that I think Disney will get right. Anything coming from this point forward will likely be laid out in a meaningful timeline (like Agents of Shield and the MCU movies), rather than back filling in gaps. Episode 3 could have been a really great movie if the Clone Wars series had existed before hand to give Anakin some more depth.
It probably could have been it's own stand alone movie. Anakin was a Jedi forged in battle and a time of turmoil for the Republic, and the series gives depth to that fact. The Jedi were not supposed to be soldiers in war, but Palpatine manipulated events enough to make that happen.

"For over a thousand generations, the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic. Before the dark times, before the Empire." - Obi-Wan Kenobi in A New Hope
sayas2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Sayas, there's a reason they cut that scene. That dude was never playing Jabba, he was a placeholder. Special effects weren't advanced enough at the time.
Ok:
If you're filming a scene with a placeholder and the intent of later putting in a big slug that has a tail, your placeholder would have a tail so your smuggler wouldn't walk behind the placeholder.

See that's how you end with a scene in which a smuggler who owes a gangster a bunch of money walks around and steps on Jabba's tail in Lucas' *******ization re-releases. Have you ever seen a gangster movie where the low level thief would live after doing something like that to the mob boss?


EDIT:
Mea Culpa:
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just more of Solo's dgaf attitude. Jabba knew Han was too good to just up and kill him on the spot. Han knew it too.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
quote:
Sayas, there's a reason they cut that scene. That dude was never playing Jabba, he was a placeholder. Special effects weren't advanced enough at the time.
Ok:
If you're filming a scene with a placeholder and the intent of later putting in a big slug that has a tail, your placeholder would have a tail so your smuggler wouldn't walk behind the placeholder.

See that's how you end with a scene in which a smuggler who owes a gangster a bunch of money walks around and steps on Jabba's tail in Lucas' *******ization re-releases. Have you ever seen a gangster movie where the low level thief would live after doing something like that to the mob boss?


Then why is he in a full costume?
then why is the body positioning all wrong for jabba
go look at the orginal comic, he was closer to human in that tHan he ended up.
go look at the orginal concept art, he was human.

And why is jabba the only character referred to by his race when every other character is referred to by title/rank/position?
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly, does any of this matter? By the time Jedi was filmed, Jabba the Hut, as a giant gangster slug, was awesome and you know it. Lucas (or someone working with him) changed a lot of things for the better. How much better is Skywalker than Starkiller for Luke's last name?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.