*** MARVEL CINEMATIC UNIVERSE *** [Staff message on OP]

3,722,249 Views | 28761 Replies | Last: 40 min ago by Bruce Almighty
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
swimmerbabe11 said:

TCTTS said:

It's absolutely worth seeing. It's nothing amazing, and needs work for sure, but it's a lot of fun, and genuinely funny.


uhh soo I loved it actually. IMO this is far from the worst MCU movie and does not deserve this bad of a showing.

I think the villain fell flat and had to be the most forgettable villain in the MCU..but this movie wasn't even about her after all was it? It was about ...well I won't spoil.

but the musical scene from CATS had me absolutely roaring in laughter. I love Cats and I think that's one of the best musical scores in the history of broadway and CATS gets way too much hate.. so I just was over the moon in that part. I also loved the musical country..but felt like we moved too abruptly in and out of that. I'd like to see more of that prince guy though please

I laughed out loud quite a bit, the fight scenes were fun, Kamala continues to be a gem.

When you think about Kamala Khan. Tom Holland, Kate Bishop, Yelena Belova, Shang Chi as the future of the Marvel Universe, these are all very very loveable characters that I want to keep seeing.
You were the target audience, so not surprising. Just not enough of you to cover the bloated production budget - need ticket buying young and older men. Not many I know want a nod to the Broadway show Cats in their super hero movies.

Per your description, the villain isn't even integral to the story. Marvel has obviously strayed from what made them successful in favor of other priorities.
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
box office mojo is showing an estimate of 47 million for Marvels opening weekend.......dang!

course that's also roughly....what.....half of what we gotta pay 'ole jimbo?

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/2023W45/?ref_=bo_hm_rw
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jokershady said:

box office mojo is showing an estimate of 47 million for Marvels opening weekend.......dang!

course that's also roughly....what.....half of what we gotta pay 'ole jimbo?

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/2023W45/?ref_=bo_hm_rw


Too soon.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

swimmerbabe11 said:

TCTTS said:

It's absolutely worth seeing. It's nothing amazing, and needs work for sure, but it's a lot of fun, and genuinely funny.


uhh soo I loved it actually. IMO this is far from the worst MCU movie and does not deserve this bad of a showing.

I think the villain fell flat and had to be the most forgettable villain in the MCU..but this movie wasn't even about her after all was it? It was about ...well I won't spoil.

but the musical scene from CATS had me absolutely roaring in laughter. I love Cats and I think that's one of the best musical scores in the history of broadway and CATS gets way too much hate.. so I just was over the moon in that part. I also loved the musical country..but felt like we moved too abruptly in and out of that. I'd like to see more of that prince guy though please

I laughed out loud quite a bit, the fight scenes were fun, Kamala continues to be a gem.

When you think about Kamala Khan. Tom Holland, Kate Bishop, Yelena Belova, Shang Chi as the future of the Marvel Universe, these are all very very loveable characters that I want to keep seeing.
You were the target audience, so not surprising. Just not enough of you to cover the bloated production budget - need ticket buying young and older men. Not many I know want a nod to the Broadway show Cats in their super hero movies.

Per your description, the villain isn't even integral to the story. Marvel has obviously strayed from what made them successful in favor of other priorities.
Sorry Toots, not enough of your kind to make a movie successful. Now get back to the kitchen while the men make stuff explode!

Dripping sarcasm aside, Swimmerbabe, I loved it too, despite being a 49 year old ticket buying older man. I even got the Cats reference, despite having testosterone And no doubt they are cooking up a Young Avengers project with Kate, Kamala, Cassie Lang, perhaps Spider-man and definitely Ned as the guy in the chair that will be fun and light and a blast to see sometime in the future. I could have watched Kamal's ferociously expansive dance on the singing/dancing planet for 20 more minutes.

rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If anything, a generic villain is a return to the roots (developing the heroes is the priority - villains are a mere obstacle to be overcome).

She was basically a female Ronan but IMO had too kind of a face to be intimidating. Maybe she should have been blue. But it was serviceable.

For those fearing the woke bogeyman, I can report with confidence that there is no man-hating in this one. It may star women and the villain may be a woman but there's not an agenda hitting you over the head. Just a traditional comic book film that happens to have 4 women in the lead roles, and one Nick Fury in support.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whenever I see a post like this in here I take a peek at the user's post history. Shockingly, I am never shocked.
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

Whenever I see a post like this in here I take a peek at the user's post history. Shockingly, I am never shocked.


He's not wrong. That movie has no appeal to me or my teenage sons or any of their friends. And my son's loved the first phase of MCU and enjoyed Captain Marvel.

Women need to support action movies marketed to women better. Of course, a lot of women, such as my wife, have no interest in seeing a Marvel movie unless it's to go see one because me or my kids want to go see one.
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm about 15 years past the due date for being the target audience of a marvel film.
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
exactly, most of the villains in the mcu are really a way for the hero to work out a metaphorical demon they are facing. this falls right in line with that.

but am I the only one who thought she liked like a mixed race twin of the Olsen's?
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bangobango said:

fig96 said:

Whenever I see a post like this in here I take a peek at the user's post history. Shockingly, I am never shocked.


He's not wrong. That movie has no appeal to me or my teenage sons or any of their friends. And my son's loved the first phase of MCU and enjoyed Captain Marvel.

Women need to support action movies marketed to women better. Of course, a lot of women, such as my wife, have no interest in seeing a Marvel movie unless it's to go see one because me or my kids want to go see one.
They can make all the thinly veiled jokes about F16 posters all they want but it doesn't change reality. Disney/Marvel has effectively lost the young male and Gen X dad market. As you noted, I have no interest and neither do my teenage sons. Wife couldn't care less either and the MCU, up to and including End Game, had become a family event.

If folks liked it, that's great. Glad they enjoyed it. But that doesn't change the fact that the audience that made the MCU the success that it was has largely lost interest.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
swimmerbabe11 said:

I'm about 15 years past the due date for being the target audience of a marvel film.
But are you?

Reading the last couple of pages on this thread describing The Marvels are you sure you're not the target audience? Cause it doesn't appear Disney was targeting young (tween to 20's) males or the Gen X dad crowd.
kerrag06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have no idea how this thread got political with the age and gender and all that. The movies are failing because the casual viewer who only sees the movie sees the preview and goes- who the heck are 2 of those 3 main characters? They haven't seen and probably don't have the time it takes to watch all these series on Disney plus. Or just don't want to. Not to mention the fact the general theme and story line of this "Multiverse" saga is 1000% more complex than 6 colored stones being gathered to erase half the universe. Heck just read the Loki thread.

As someone who watches all the series and highly enjoys everything about marvel, I understand why these movies are making so much less. With the infinity saga all the movies were easy to watch and less complex. And all you had to watch was the movies. One every 6 months or more- no series. Heck only really endgame went off the rails with time travel. Marvel has narrowed their audience way too much with this saga simply based on that- and that alone seems dumb when it comes down to money and profit. I mean, how many casual viewers (no that does not include people posting on this thread) even know there is such thing as "saga".

I have made about 100 jokes to my GF about women power and rolled my eyes during this previews. Did I particularly like captain marvel all of the sudden getting her own movie at the end of the infinity saga and then completely saving the day? not really. It just seemed out of nowhere. But that wasn't going to keep me from seeing the dang movie and having to become a Top 5 favorite movie ever for me.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Disney+ has really hurt the brand - especially dog**** like Secret Invasion. But even niche stuff like Ms Marvel and Moon Knight where people go "huh? I dunno I'll just skip this one" and now the MCU went from must-see to optional.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
100%. They've at least now realized the Disney+ mistake - and to be fair, nearly every studio fell victim to the streaming craze of the late '10s - but it might very well be too little too late.
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Echo and Agatha may be done and ready to go live but I'd put them and Ironheart on hold if it were up to me. Ain't nobody kicking down your door to see those.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bangobango said:

fig96 said:

Whenever I see a post like this in here I take a peek at the user's post history. Shockingly, I am never shocked.

He's not wrong. That movie has no appeal to me or my teenage sons or any of their friends. And my son's loved the first phase of MCU and enjoyed Captain Marvel.

Women need to support action movies marketed to women better. Of course, a lot of women, such as my wife, have no interest in seeing a Marvel movie unless it's to go see one because me or my kids want to go see one.
Unless the number of women has decreased 3x since the opening of Captain Marvel then yes, he's wrong.

The issue, as just alluded to, is that these movies have no real stakes and none of the "I've gotta see this" than the MCU has had in the past. We've all generally agreed over the last year that the must see factor and overall quality of the MCU has dropped off considerably, it's not "women aren't seeing the movie".
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
maroon barchetta said:

jokershady said:

box office mojo is showing an estimate of 47 million for Marvels opening weekend.......dang!

course that's also roughly....what.....half of what we gotta pay 'ole jimbo?

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/2023W45/?ref_=bo_hm_rw


Too soon.














just a little 5 minute distraction to avoid further going down the rabbit hole of arguing over Disney's self destruction
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
kerrag06 said:

I have no idea how this thread got political with the age and gender and all that. The movies are failing because the casual viewer who only sees the movie sees the preview and goes- who the heck are 2 of those 3 main characters? They haven't seen and probably don't have the time it takes to watch all these series on Disney plus. Or just don't want to. Not to mention the fact the general theme and story line of this "Multiverse" saga is 1000% more complex than 6 colored stones being gathered to erase half the universe. Heck just read the Loki thread.
Just alluded to this but yes, this is the obvious answer.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't mention any other forum in my comment. Interesting that you drew that conclusion though.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jokershady said:

maroon barchetta said:

jokershady said:

box office mojo is showing an estimate of 47 million for Marvels opening weekend.......dang!

course that's also roughly....what.....half of what we gotta pay 'ole jimbo?

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/2023W45/?ref_=bo_hm_rw


Too soon.














just a little 5 minute distraction to avoid further going down the rabbit hole of arguing over Disney's self destruction
Ornithopter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
swimmerbabe11 said:

exactly, most of the villains in the mcu are really a way for the hero to work out a metaphorical demon they are facing. this falls right in line with that.

but am I the only one who thought she liked like a mixed race twin of the Olsen's?


I think that Wanda, in particular, looks a lot like one of the Olsen twins.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DubFalls said:

swimmerbabe11 said:

exactly, most of the villains in the mcu are really a way for the hero to work out a metaphorical demon they are facing. this falls right in line with that.

but am I the only one who thought she liked like a mixed race twin of the Olsen's?


I think that Wanda, in particular, looks a lot like one of the Olsen twins.
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
kerrag06 said:

I have no idea how this thread got political with the age and gender and all that. The movies are failing because the casual viewer who only sees the movie sees the preview and goes- who the heck are 2 of those 3 main characters? They haven't seen and probably don't have the time it takes to watch all these series on Disney plus. Or just don't want to. Not to mention the fact the general theme and story line of this "Multiverse" saga is 1000% more complex than 6 colored stones being gathered to erase half the universe. Heck just read the Loki thread.

As someone who watches all the series and highly enjoys everything about marvel, I understand why these movies are making so much less. With the infinity saga all the movies were easy to watch and less complex. And all you had to watch was the movies. One every 6 months or more- no series. Heck only really endgame went off the rails with time travel. Marvel has narrowed their audience way too much with this saga simply based on that- and that alone seems dumb when it comes down to money and profit. I mean, how many casual viewers (no that does not include people posting on this thread) even know there is such thing as "saga".

I have made about 100 jokes to my GF about women power and rolled my eyes during this previews. Did I particularly like captain marvel all of the sudden getting her own movie at the end of the infinity saga and then completely saving the day? not really. It just seemed out of nowhere. But that wasn't going to keep me from seeing the dang movie and having to become a Top 5 favorite movie ever for me.


That doesn't really make any sense to me. How do you narrow your audience by having more content preceding the movie?

It's not like everybody who went to see Iron Man read his comics. I sure as hell never did and didn't know anything about him. Same with Dr Strange, Captain America, Thor, Ant Man, etc. Ironically, Hulk was probably the best known of the original Avengers. People may have been vaguely familiar with the name, but most of the viewers never read the comics or knew the back story, but they still went to see them because the movies looked good to them. Maybe it was like a snowball and they picked up steam as they went, but the early ones that were hits didn't have that advatnage.

So, how is that any different than not seeing a streaming series before going to the movie? If the movie looked appealing to the type of people who like to go see super hero movies, then people who like to go see superhero movies would've gone and watched the movie, regardless of whatever background material they missed out on.

This movies marketing material was heavily targeted towards women. I've seen absolutely no male lead in any of the previews. Women aren't going to see it. That's the take away here. The too much streaming background is just a red herring.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Olsen twins:
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think casual viewers - or even fans that just haven't watched everything - go "I don't know half of these characters" and opt out. Maybe they see they have homework to do first, or just no familiar faces are calling them back.

It's almost like Birds of Prey - a character from a movie that somehow made a lot of money (Harley Quinn / Suicide Squad) plus two chicks you don't know.

I wonder how this would have done if it was marketed as Captain Marvel 2 the whole time. Maybe the exact same - but highlighting the characters you don't know, in this age of over saturation, kinda discourages casuals from catching up or checking it out. IMO.
LeonardSkinner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely Not A Cop said:

The Olsen twins:



Evans is like, "Steve Rogers may have America's ass, but Wanda Maximoff has the world's…"
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

I didn't mention any other forum in my comment. Interesting that you drew that conclusion though.
Trust me, it's a pretty simple (and accurate) conclusion to come to.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bangobango said:

fig96 said:

Whenever I see a post like this in here I take a peek at the user's post history. Shockingly, I am never shocked.


He's not wrong. That movie has no appeal to me or my teenage sons or any of their friends. And my son's loved the first phase of MCU and enjoyed Captain Marvel.

Women need to support action movies marketed to women better. Of course, a lot of women, such as my wife, have no interest in seeing a Marvel movie unless it's to go see one because me or my kids want to go see one.


Related. NSFW.



maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hesrightyouknow.gif
In reply to
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rhutton125 said:

Echo and Agatha may be done and ready to go live but I'd put them and Ironheart on hold if it were up to me. Ain't nobody kicking down your door to see those.

I believe they made a significant mistake by not using Tony Stark in the setup for Ironheart. I wonder if they're seriously considering scrapping that project.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Definitely Not A Cop said:

The Olsen twins:

I think Cap must not have had "Watch Seinfeld" written in his notebook from the beginning of The Winter Soldier.

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bangobango said:

kerrag06 said:

I have no idea how this thread got political with the age and gender and all that. The movies are failing because the casual viewer who only sees the movie sees the preview and goes- who the heck are 2 of those 3 main characters? They haven't seen and probably don't have the time it takes to watch all these series on Disney plus. Or just don't want to. Not to mention the fact the general theme and story line of this "Multiverse" saga is 1000% more complex than 6 colored stones being gathered to erase half the universe. Heck just read the Loki thread.

As someone who watches all the series and highly enjoys everything about marvel, I understand why these movies are making so much less. With the infinity saga all the movies were easy to watch and less complex. And all you had to watch was the movies. One every 6 months or more- no series. Heck only really endgame went off the rails with time travel. Marvel has narrowed their audience way too much with this saga simply based on that- and that alone seems dumb when it comes down to money and profit. I mean, how many casual viewers (no that does not include people posting on this thread) even know there is such thing as "saga".

I have made about 100 jokes to my GF about women power and rolled my eyes during this previews. Did I particularly like captain marvel all of the sudden getting her own movie at the end of the infinity saga and then completely saving the day? not really. It just seemed out of nowhere. But that wasn't going to keep me from seeing the dang movie and having to become a Top 5 favorite movie ever for me.


That doesn't really make any sense to me. How do you narrow your audience by having more content preceding the movie?

It's not like everybody who went to see Iron Man read his comics. I sure as hell never did and didn't know anything about him. Same with Dr Strange, Captain America, Thor, Ant Man, etc. Ironically, Hulk was probably the best known of the original Avengers. People may have been vaguely familiar with the name, but most of the viewers never read the comics or knew the back story, but they still went to see them because the movies looked good to them. Maybe it was like a snowball and they picked up steam as they went, but the early ones that were hits didn't have that advatnage.

So, how is that any different than not seeing a streaming series before going to the movie? If the movie looked appealing to the type of people who like to go see super hero movies, then people who like to go see superhero movies would've gone and watched the movie, regardless of whatever background material they missed out on.

This movies marketing material was heavily targeted towards women. I've seen absolutely no male lead in any of the previews. Women aren't going to see it. That's the take away here. The too much streaming background is just a red herring.

First of all, not having read the comics is WAY different than not having seen an MCU Disney+ series or two. Like, those things aren't even in the same ballpark, in terms of the knowledge needed to understand the overarching story.

But more importantly, before Disney+, the MCU was relegated to one format that pretty much everyone had equal access to - movies. Be them in the theater or at home, it was relatively easy to keep track/watch the vast majority of them, especially when we only had to make that commitment two or three times a year.

However, once Disney+ was introduced, a not insignificant swath of that audience chose not to subscribe for whatever reasons, be it access, additional $$$, etc. It was an extra cost/step, beyond a trip to the theater, beyond a standard cable package, and beyond the streamers people already subscribed to.

There's also the fact that the time commitment necessary to keep track of the MCU rose significantly with Disney+. For instance, in 2017, 2018, and 2019, there were only three movies released each of those years (with roughly only two per year prior to then). At an average runtime of 2h 15m per movie, that's only a 6h 45m total time commitment per year.

Starting in 2021, though (there was no MCU content in 2020 due to Covid), that time commitment jumped significantly…

2021 = 4 movies, 4 live-action series = 29h 25m total time commitment
2022 = 3 movies, 3 live-action series = 22h 20m total time commitment
2023 = 3 movies, 2 live-action series = 15h 45m total time commitment

So it's pretty easy to see how that increase led to a number of people dropping off/not being able to keep up, both in terms of the cost and the time commitment. Add to it the fact that the quality of the content dipped significantly with the advent of Disney+, due to the creatives being spread far too thin, which led to even more of an audience drop off.

Honestly, this is pretty basic common sense, and not at all a "red herring." It's literally THE primary reason for the overall audience drop off.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not only that but if the shows were captivating, people would watch. It's not uncommon for a TV show to kind of go viral. it feels like everyone seems to be watching it. Wednesday, Stranger Things, Mandolorian, One Piece, Ozark, Squid Game, Tiger King, and Ted Lasso all come to mind in the last few years. Going several more back it was The Office, Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, Walking Dead, etc.

While there are too many shows to keep up with the whole universe, it could be done on a smaller scale if they were actually good.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Totally. And it feels like WandaVision and Loki were the only two that went even remotely viral in that sense, though still not at a level any of the other shows you mentioned achieved.
First Page Last Page
Page 720 of 822
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.