Ok, well in your first post it seemed like you were talking about the order when it existed. There isn't an order after that to give out titles, so it's kind of moot. Though, Yoda does in fact tell Luke he's not a Jedi yet until he faces Vader again. Now, that probably had to do with Luke having to overcome all the stuff involved with that, regardless of what he'd already mastered in terms of the force.The Porkchop Express said:My point is that when there is no longer an Order or a Council, a person like Ahsoka or Luke could call themselves what they wanted. Luke tells Jabba via hologram that he's a "Jedi Knight and friend of Captain Solo." Well Yoda didn't make him one and neither did Obi-wan, so it's just Luke adopting that title for himself.redline248 said:Why shouldn't they? Genuinely curious. Do you think Anakin should get to tell people he's a master at the time of 3 even though the council didn't think he was at that level yet? I think he basically proved they were right.The Porkchop Express said:
My point is that the order shouldn't decide whi is a knight. A jedi can determine what to call themselves.
Ahsoka was offered the Knighthood and turned it down, turned her back on the Jedi during the final season of Clone Wars and again at Padme's funeral, but when the inquisitor comes for her in Tales of the Jedi, she calls Bail Organa and says shes ready to get back to it, ushering in her involvement in Rebels. I'm sure she got introduced in certain circles as Jedi Knight at that point and it made sense.
As for Ahsoka, I don't think she'll ever consider herself a jedi, but who knows what Bail says about her. I would assume if he used jedi it would only be to the most trusted people, simply due to the risk involved throwing that out there.