Airplane porn.

158,792 Views | 729 Replies | Last: 24 days ago by aTmAg
dubi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABATTBQ11 said:

falcon09 said:

That's one of the coolest pictures I've ever seen of 'Fat Amy'.


Where'd this one go?
F35

Speedbird087
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phantoms still active in Japan (as of 2018)

falcon09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dubi said:

falcon09 said:

That's one of the coolest pictures I've ever seen of 'Fat Amy'.
Is that the CH53 nickname?


Actually, it's a nickname for the F-35. I'm pretty sure F-16 pilots started the name because it was supposed to "replace" the F-16. It's quite a large airplane, comparatively.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
falcon09 said:

dubi said:

falcon09 said:

That's one of the coolest pictures I've ever seen of 'Fat Amy'.
Is that the CH53 nickname?


Actually, it's a nickname for the F-35. I'm pretty sure F-16 pilots started the name because it was supposed to "replace" the F-16. It's quite a large airplane, comparatively.
Hey...it could be worse...if the X-32 won the downselect in 2001.



I understand the Boeing engineers nicknamed it 'Monica'...
JB!98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dubi said:

falcon09 said:

That's one of the coolest pictures I've ever seen of 'Fat Amy'.
Is that the CH53 nickname?


Pretty sure the nickname for the 53 is the ****ter.
Today, unfortunately, many Americans have good reason to fear that they will be victimized if they are unable to protect themselves. And today, no less than in 1791, the Second Amendment guarantees their right to do so. - Justice Samuel Alito 2022
Sticks&Stones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah...It's a toy, but it's an expensive toy and I love the sound of this thing



Take off around the 3:30 mark
Claude!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sticks&Stones said:

Yeah...It's a toy, but it's an expensive toy and I love the sound of this thing



Take off around the 3:30 mark
What is that, an Airbus 380 for ants?!
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Never mind. Thought he'd replied to the CH53 and didn't see it up top
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dubi said:

falcon09 said:

That's one of the coolest pictures I've ever seen of 'Fat Amy'.
Is that the CH53 nickname?


CH-53 is the S hitter
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seen that. It amazes me what some people will pump money into. I think the engines in that thing are like $2.5k a piece. Then there's the whole body, controls, and everything else that was custom built. Probably north of $50k in that thing.
BaitShack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My friends baby great lakes. I don't know how he squeezes into that thing.





CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

My friends baby great lakes
Looks like a pedal plane

Goose
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Can't have the Spitfire (as sexy as it is obviously) getting all the glory...
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A little bit of work aircraft porn.

Penguin B

AggieBand2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BaitShack said:





What is this, a plane for ants?
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Can't have the Spitfire (as sexy as it is obviously) getting all the glory...
The Hurry, the B-24, and the P-47 did the heavy lifting in WWII, and the Spitfire, B-17, and P-51 got all the press.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CanyonAg77 said:

Quote:

Can't have the Spitfire (as sexy as it is obviously) getting all the glory...
The Hurry, the B-24, and the P-47 did the heavy lifting in WWII, and the Spitfire, B-17, and P-51 got all the press.


Sex sells.

Then again there were German aces that found out after the fsct they were shot down by hurricanes with superior numbers and they begged the air command to list it as a spitfire kill to avoid the embarrassment.
AggieBand2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Hurricane and Spitfire were so comparable in every way but their appearance.
It's like having two women of similar personalities, success, wife/nurturing potential, etc. but one looks like Kate Beckinsale and the other looks like Lena Dunham.

The choice is easy.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't believe performance and capability were comparable. There were just a lot more hurricanes available early in the war.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spitfire might out climb and outrun a Hurry, by a little, but a Hurry could out turn and out gun a Spit. And the wood and fabric meant they could take more damage and be repaired easier.

It's not a simple which is better argument
AggieBand2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Much like Canyon said, each had their own strengths and weaknesses. Taken as a whole, the airframes ended up being pretty comparable. Tactics would certainly be different between the two.
You're 100% right that there were more Hurricanes. The per unit price for a Spit was almost twice as high.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CanyonAg77 said:

Quote:

Can't have the Spitfire (as sexy as it is obviously) getting all the glory...
The Hurry, the B-24, and the P-47 did the heavy lifting in WWII, and the Spitfire, B-17, and P-51 got all the press.
My dad always said the B-24 could take a heavier bomb load further than the B-17. There's a reason 24s hit Ploesti and we're the choice in China-Burma-India.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep, had an uncle who crewed on B-24s out of northern Australia and other places in the South Pacific
dubi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spitfire


AggieBand2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A Mk IX, too. My favorite version.
The Spit got uglier with age... the bubble canopy from the Mustang, the pointed tail, and especially the elongated nose for the Griffon engine
frankm01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Freight dog. DC8-73.

Photo credit: CLR2LND
Mr. Dubi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll play: One half of the P-63f's ever built, and the only one still in existence
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good article on that Kingcobra

http://warbirdsnews.com/warbird-restorations/caf-bell-p-63f-kingcobra-re-emerges-in-fresh-livery.html
Goose
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Growing up in Austin, my dad's group of flying buddies included a lot of retired Air Force types. From that subset there were quite a few who saw combat in Viet Nam, a few less that had seen combat in Korea, and then a handful that flew in WWII. And in that little WWII group was one guy who had flown a B-24 on those Ploesti raids. He was a quiet, small, frail old guy, but he was universally respected and deferred to as the bravest, baddest MFer in the group. The collective group included fighter jocks (one of which flew with the Thunderbirds), ground attack guys, guys who'd flown far more sophisticated aircraft, jets, helos, all kinds of crazy stuff and missions. But to a man they'd tell you that anybody who participated in those Ploesti raids, pilot, navigator, gunner, whatever, had been through the worst there was.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.af.mil/Medal-of-Honor/Hughes/

HUGHES, LLOYD H.



Rank: Second Lieutenant
Organization: U.S. Army
Company: 564th Bomber Squadron
Division: 389th Bomber Group, 9th Air Force
Born: 12 July 1921, Alexandria, La.
Departed: Yes
Entered Service At: San Antonio, Tex.
G.O. Number: 17
Date of Issue: 02/26/1944
Accredited To:
Place / Date: Ploesti Raid, Rumania, 1 August 1943



For conspicuous gallantry in action and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty.

On August 1943, 2d Lt. Hughes served in the capacity of pilot of a heavy bombardment aircraft participating in a long and hazardous minimum-altitude attack against the Axis oil refineries of Ploesti, Rumania, launched from the northern shores of Africa. Flying in the last formation to attack the target, he arrived in the target area after previous flights had thoroughly alerted the enemy defenses.

Approaching the target through intense and accurate antiaircraft fire and dense balloon barrages at dangerously low altitude, his plane received several direct hits from both large and small caliber antiaircraft guns which seriously damaged his aircraft, causing sheets of escaping gasoline to stream from the bomb bay and from the left wing. This damage was inflicted at a time prior to reaching the target when 2d Lt. Hughes could have made a forced landing in any of the grain fields readily available at that time. The target area was blazing with burning oil tanks and damaged refinery installations from which flames leaped high above the bombing level of the formation. With full knowledge of the consequences of entering this blazing inferno when his airplane was profusely leaking gasoline in two separate locations, 2d Lt. Hughes, motivated only by his high conception of duty which called for the destruction of his assigned target at any cost, did not elect to make a forced landing or turn back from the attack. Instead, rather than jeopardize the formation and the success of the attack, he unhesitatingly entered the blazing area and dropped his bomb load with great precision.

After successfully bombing the objective, his aircraft emerged from the conflagration with the left wing aflame. Only then did he attempt a forced landing, but because of the advanced stage of the fire enveloping his aircraft the plane crashed and was consumed. By 2d Lt. Hughes' heroic decision to complete his mission regardless of the consequences in utter disregard of his own life, and by his gallant and valorous execution of this decision, he has rendered a service to our country in the defeat of our enemies which will everlastingly be outstanding in the annals of our Nation's history.
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have a neat picture from the DFW Spotters group, wish it had a watermark because it's so awesome and I wish the photographer could get credit... anyway, a totally sweet picture from the 2017 Fort Worth Alliance Air Show.
AggieBand2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Awesome shot
AggieBand2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Random pic just taken at work, but I always get a kick at how the 777's engine nacelles seem the same size as the 717's fuselage
falcon09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieBand2004 said:

Random pic just taken at work, but I always get a kick at how the 777's engine nacelles seem the same size as the 717's fuselage



Just Googled it, and it's not an illusion. The 717 fuselage is 132 inches wide and the GE90-115 is 135 inches in diameter.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One of my dad's childhood (and current) friends Col John W. Oliver '44 flew on those raids. He still lives between Belton and Little River.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.