Outfielder
5′8″
/
180 lbs
San Antonio, TX
Smithson Valley
Freshman
6/8/2023
Microscope & Telescope: Schlossnagle says A&M deserves 'best of the best'
3/27/2023
'No excuses to be made': Schlossnagle seeking answers after shaky SEC start
3/20/2023
Jim Schlossnagle looks back on A&M's weekend series vs. No. 1 LSU
3/18/2023
A&M pitching issues 11 walks to No. 1 LSU as Aggies suffer 12-7 loss
3/16/2023
Schlossnagle's Aggies remain a 'work in progress' as LSU rolls into Olsen
3/13/2023
A&M skipper Jim Schlossnagle discusses an undefeated 10-day stretch
3/10/2023
Series Preview: No. 15 A&M faces NKU on final non-conference weekend
3/9/2023
Schlossnagle's Ags bring four-game heater into weekend set vs. Norse
2/20/2023
Jim Schlossnagle recaps a successful opening weekend at Blue Bell Park
2/13/2023
4 Days 'til Aggie Baseball: Inside baseball recruiting with Nolan Cain
2/10/2023
7 Days 'til Aggie Baseball: Michael Earley back for year two in Aggieland
1/30/2023
Jim Schlossnagle addresses rule changes, things to watch for in 2023
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.