82% of US adults vaccinated; how have we not achieved herd immunity?

11,031 Views | 91 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by ORAggieFan
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jabin said:

Quote:

Bottom line is, I still don't get what is upsetting you. Is it that people are saying certain things or thinking certain things that you don't like? Why do you care what someone thinks or says?
Looking right back at you. Why do you care what I think or say?


Well YOU obviously DO care what people say

I'm just wondering why, and why it would prompt you to complain so much

Your whole existence on this thread is gnashing your teeth over what people say and think. I'm just puzzled as to why, I was hoping you could shed some light
Kyle Field Shade Chaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DCAggie13y said:

74% of people over the age of 5 have been vaccinated.

You have to think at least 33% of the unvaccinated have prior infection which puts us around 90% vaccinated or previously infected.

All this talk about the unvaccinated, you couldn't get 82% of adults to eat free ice cream. The population of unvaccinated with no prior infection can't be so large that it's the root of all problems in the US.

Is it leaky vaccines? Or is the unboosted that are the problem?


74% over 5 is a lie. Not sure of many who believe that number. Where I live I would imagine maybe 74% over 30 but the number between 5 and 18 here is less than 25%.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Covid is endemic, here to stay, and we have vaccines and therapeutics to fight it. It's just another respiratory virus. It's time to move on and live your life and prepare accordingly.

In that regard, I propose that this board now be retired as it's no longer necessary and has served it's purpose.
cc_ag92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If it serves no purpose to you, why are you here? Do you visit every TexAgs board that doesn't interest you?
Aston94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Covid is endemic, here to stay, and we have vaccines and therapeutics to fight it. It's just another respiratory virus. It's time to move on and live your life and prepare accordingly.

In that regard, I propose that this board now be retired as it's no longer necessary and has served it's purpose.
Or you could just ignore it, much like I ignore most of the boards on TexAgs...
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DCAggie13y said:

74% of people over the age of 5 have been vaccinated.

You have to think at least 33% of the unvaccinated have prior infection which puts us around 90% vaccinated or previously infected.

All this talk about the unvaccinated, you couldn't get 82% of adults to eat free ice cream. The population of unvaccinated with no prior infection can't be so large that it's the root of all problems in the US.

Is it leaky vaccines? Or is the unboosted that are the problem?
Herd immunity isn't going to happen unless the immunity lasts for significant time. Even then, it would be tough since there is always the possibility for new outbreaks to pop up since it is a zoonosis.

The concept of herd immunity comes from veterinary science and herds of animals in which you have a group of animals kept together and apart from other animals of their kind. For that kind of herd immunity in humans, it would just about take living in a very isolated population like maybe on a distant, nearly impossible to reach island that doesn't get visitors.

So in regards to humans, the meaning has been changed a bit.

The following is from a ProMED post on October 21, 2020:

Quote:

The original context of recognising the phenomenon of herd immunity was outbreaks of contagious infection in herds of cattle. A herd consisted of a finite number of heads of cattle, free-roaming in the farmer's land, without contact with other cattle. If nothing was done, many would get infected and some would die -- but eventually, the outbreak itself would die out, sparing others that never got infected. Animals that recovered from infection were typically immune but the uninfected ones lacked this immunity.

...

Second: a 'herd' refers to a group of animals that have no contact with other animals. So, the condition of herd immunity required no in-migration of fresh animals during an outbreak, so that there is no external source of infection in addition to the intra-herd source.

...

Herd immunity in the human context is defined differently by 2 schools of vaccinologists. The traditionalists maintain that herd immunity was the theoretical possibility of interrupting transmission when a majority was infected and became immune. There has never been a real-life situation of herd immunity interrupting contagious infection in open societies. In island populations without in-migration, outbreaks have died out until they were reintroduced later.

...

Herd immunity conditions in herds of cattle cannot apply in human communities.

Practical vaccinologists define herd immunity as the fraction of people immune in the community -- a simple way to measure the immunity profile of a community. We might as well call it 'community immunity'.

I can only think of one viral disease affecting humans that has been eradicated -- smallpox.

In spite of massive efforts against other viral diseases such as polio and measles, both are still around in parts of the world.

And rabies, in which nearly all human cases arise from contact with animals, is rampant through much of the world with tens of thousands of human deaths per year.
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm vaccinated and still got it. Should have natural booster once this clears up.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jabin said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

agforlife97 said:

Vaccines don't prevent you from getting covid or transmitting it, apparently, so herd immunity may not be possible until everyone gets infected, and maybe not even then. Probably covid will mutate over time and become less deadly and then it will be over.
For everyone not working in a covid unit, it's already over. You just have to stop living differently than you did before.
How can you possibly make that assertion? I just attended the memorial service for a 65 year old retired Marine who died of Covid. Try telling him and his family that "it's already over".
It's hardly over, but we do need to figure out how to best live with it.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jabin said:

coolerguy12 said:

Jabin said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

agforlife97 said:

Vaccines don't prevent you from getting covid or transmitting it, apparently, so herd immunity may not be possible until everyone gets infected, and maybe not even then. Probably covid will mutate over time and become less deadly and then it will be over.
For everyone not working in a covid unit, it's already over. You just have to stop living differently than you did before.
How can you possibly make that assertion? I just attended the memorial service for a 65 year old retired Marine who died of Covid. Try telling him and his family that "it's already over".


Genuinely sorry about your friend but I'm also no going to alter my life because of it. People die every day of all ages. It's the only guarantee we have in life. Covid is over in the sense that people can and should go back to normal. Some of us have been as normal as possible since the beginning. If I were to lose someone to Covid I would celebrate them at their funeral, cry with their loved ones, and move on just like if I were to lose someone to cancer, or a car wreck, or old age.

It's over in that sense if we would let it be over.
Nobody in this discussion is saying that you should alter your life. That was not the point of the discussion. The point of the discussion is when Covid will get so weak that it is over, that is, no longer a threat.
What makes you think that it will get weak?
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many times have you had it?
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think you can move on with your life without proclaiming COVID is over. But I guess that nuance is missed by the "muh freedoms" crowd.

I have moved on with my life after I got vaccinated. But that doesn't mean all the issues it presents are over. Overstressing the medical system is still a very legitimate concern particularly when it is paired with other things like the flu. I still think we're in a dangerous stage where we need to monitor how the virus is spreading and the characteristics of new variants in case something seriously changes... But at the same time I don't think you should wear a mask and shield yourself from other people and otherwise not live your life. Too many of you think the best course of action is pretending it doesn't exist and just let whatever happens happen. I think that's arrogant and dangerous at this point. On a personal level, whatever. On a systemic level we aren't there yet, but we will get there in time.

I am optimistic that this Omicron variant will get us closer to the future of lesser disease and deaths. But you can't put the genie back in the bottle and we need to be prepared for other eventualities. Ofcourse it will be here - it probably already is. But best to not fly a plane full of passengers - 10% already infected (like the planes coming from S. Africa) - drop them off in a US airport and just say "if he dies, he dies". Delay the initial spread of Omicron, start work on vaccines targetting mid-q1, live your lives normally unless proven otherwise, and hope that it turns out we don't need to do anything and can flat out ignore it. But you don't start by pretending that you can ignore it. Plenty of reason to believe people with any immunity to COVID will be just fine. Let's be sure of that before we proclaim "mission accomplished".
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You vacillate between "can't just pretend it's gone" and "live your lives normally" or bounce from "it's here to stay" and "let's not bring in planes full of infected folks" - I'm struggling to isolate what you may be proposing as far as an actionable vision.

And if there's nothing actionable (especially at the individual level) then the only thing preventing it from being over is a person dwelling on it.
Capitol Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

For example, it's just as wrong for folks to ridicule those wearing masks as it is to force people to wear masks in inappropriate settings.
Could not disagree with you more here. While it might be "wrong" to ridicule those choosing to wear masks, mandates are much worse. Except in the most desperate of circumstances, mandates are not needed . One might argue that in the height of the the Alpha spike b4 we had a vaccine. But we went WAAAAY to quickly back to masking mandates during the Delta spike when we had a vaccine that people could choose to take IF they wanted it. The vast majority of those hospitalized were unvaccinated. I do believe the vaccine works. What hasn't worked is the messaging and attempted mandating of this vaccine. Now the CDC says we NEED boosters? We do not. SO dumb and a terrible message.

Not to mention, a lot of us who have chosen to live a healthy lifestyle that protects us from any serious effects from Covid are tired of having to deal with the rest of the population that has chosen not tom make themselves bullet proof.

Look, I'm fine if people want to mask and mitigate still. All I ask is not to expect all of us who do not to also do it. Honestly that is all most of us who say "it's over" are saying. It's over for us. We have done our part to this point, gotten vaccinated etc. We feel we are entitled to move on from all of this. I'd argue even if there is another spike. Even if we have some ICUs fill up. It won't be us filling it up from Covid, so it's really pointless to place masking mandates, limits and ask for closures at this point. A lack of masks isn't what would be filling ICUs at this point. It's the fact that enough aren't vaccinated (or have natural immunity which is probably better) when they do get Covid. Masking was never truly proven to work anyway. But mandating vaccines is also the wrong approach. We need to let the individual decide what is the best approach for them. I know that will make some uncomfortable, but part of the price of living in a free society.
Capitol Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

the only thing preventing it from being over is a person dwelling on it.
In most cases this is exactly what is happening. And back to my point, many of us feel that there is a certain level of bitterness from some b/c we have decided not to dwell on this anymore. Maybe it is all in our head and manufactured but when you see people still supporting mandates, it makes you wonder...
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gordo14 said:

I think you can move on with your life without proclaiming COVID is over. But I guess that nuance is missed by the "muh freedoms" crowd.

I have moved on with my life after I got vaccinated. But that doesn't mean all the issues it presents are over. Overstressing the medical system is still a very legitimate concern particularly when it is paired with other things like the flu. I still think we're in a dangerous stage where we need to monitor how the virus is spreading and the characteristics of new variants in case something seriously changes... But at the same time I don't think you should wear a mask and shield yourself from other people and otherwise not live your life. Too many of you think the best course of action is pretending it doesn't exist and just let whatever happens happen. I think that's arrogant and dangerous at this point. On a personal level, whatever. On a systemic level we aren't there yet, but we will get there in time.

I am optimistic that this Omicron variant will get us closer to the future of lesser disease and deaths. But you can't put the genie back in the bottle and we need to be prepared for other eventualities. Ofcourse it will be here - it probably already is. But best to not fly a plane full of passengers - 10% already infected (like the planes coming from S. Africa) - drop them off in a US airport and just say "if he dies, he dies". Delay the initial spread of Omicron, start work on vaccines targetting mid-q1, live your lives normally unless proven otherwise, and hope that it turns out we don't need to do anything and can flat out ignore it. But you don't start by pretending that you can ignore it. Plenty of reason to believe people with any immunity to COVID will be just fine. Let's be sure of that before we proclaim "mission accomplished".
Nuance is missed because half the population desperately wants freedoms removed and curtailed. It's kind of hard for the rest of us who appreciate freedom and liberty watch what is happening in Australia - a supposedly free and democratic country based in western civics who puts their citizens in camps over a respiratory virus with this low of a death rate.

We watch that and see lockdown after lockdown in Europe (all of which have studies and experts saying they harm more than help) and then see Americans here foaming at the mouth in rage over people who do not want to wear a mask or get vaccinated. We are not immune to the insanity of other western countries sacrificing their way of life over this.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

How many times have you had it?
At least once. Possibly twice -- I had the same symptoms to the same degree as when I had it earlier, but I didn't get tested.

What does that have to do with the question about the virus getting weaker?
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jabin said:

coolerguy12 said:

Jabin said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

agforlife97 said:

Vaccines don't prevent you from getting covid or transmitting it, apparently, so herd immunity may not be possible until everyone gets infected, and maybe not even then. Probably covid will mutate over time and become less deadly and then it will be over.
For everyone not working in a covid unit, it's already over. You just have to stop living differently than you did before.
How can you possibly make that assertion? I just attended the memorial service for a 65 year old retired Marine who died of Covid. Try telling him and his family that "it's already over".


Genuinely sorry about your friend but I'm also no going to alter my life because of it. People die every day of all ages. It's the only guarantee we have in life. Covid is over in the sense that people can and should go back to normal. Some of us have been as normal as possible since the beginning. If I were to lose someone to Covid I would celebrate them at their funeral, cry with their loved ones, and move on just like if I were to lose someone to cancer, or a car wreck, or old age.

It's over in that sense if we would let it be over.
Nobody in this discussion is saying that you should alter your life. That was not the point of the discussion. The point of the discussion is when Covid will get so weak that it is over, that is, no longer a threat.


By that criteria, the flu is not and never will be over. It's a ridiculous standard.
Jabin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What do you think "over" means? We may simply be talking past each other, using the same terms but meaning something dramatically different by them.

For example, the flu is not "over", not in the sense that the measles, smallpox, or a myriad of other diseases are "over".

By asserting that the flu and covid are "over", you've changed the meaning of the word in the context of diseases.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The flu will likely never be "over" in the sense that people will still get it, get sick and die from it. The same is true for covid. I think people says Covid isn't "over" are saying that it's way past time to stop with the ineffective nonsense meant to "fight" it. Stop masking, stop with the plexiglass, capacity restrictions, etc. Hospitals will not be overrun at this point, so it's over from a public policy standpoint.
Jabin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

The flu will likely never be "over" in the sense that people will still get it, get sick and die from it. The same is true for covid. I think people says Covid isn't "over" are saying that it's way past time to stop with the ineffective nonsense meant to "fight" it. Stop masking, stop with the plexiglass, capacity restrictions, etc. Hospitals will not be overrun at this point, so it's over from a public policy standpoint.
That I largely agree with.

But for people who are old, fat, have diabetes or with other comorbidities, it's not over. They still need to take cautions to protect themselves. And people who care about them should be considerate in helping them protect themselves.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm fine with people who are at risk getting a vaccine that is effective at preventing severe outcomes, and I'm fine with them staying home, wearing a mask, or carrying a lucky rabbits foot to keep them safe. That is the limit of the consideration they should expect.
Jabin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

I'm fine with people who are at risk getting a vaccine that is effective at preventing severe outcomes, and I'm fine with them staying home, wearing a mask, or carrying a lucky rabbits foot to keep them safe. That is the limit of the consideration they should expect.
What about family get togethers? Should they be forced to put their health at further risk, or should family make any accommodations for them?

What about eating at restaurants with family and friends. Should f&f be willing to eat outdoors or should they insist that their 80 year old grandparents eat indoors?
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't care what families do
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jabin said:

What do you think "over" means? We may simply be talking past each other, using the same terms but meaning something dramatically different by them.

For example, the flu is not "over", not in the sense that the measles, smallpox, or a myriad of other diseases are "over".

By asserting that the flu and covid are "over", you've changed the meaning of the word in the context of diseases.
Over means it's endemic and the country needs to shift its response accordingly. It's the flu in that regard and we all need to move on. If you are highly susceptible, then the first thing you should do is look in the mirror. If you are fat, then stop being fat and you reduce your chances dramatically.

Your next milestone after not being fat is then when you get old. Now we can start talking about the preventative things we need to be doing that are logical.
Jabin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What do you think is the percentage of people > 65 who are overweight?

What do you think is the percentage of people > 65 who are overweight have successfully gotten down to a BMI of 25 or less and kept it off for 3 years or more?

And do you agree that some people have comorbidities over which they have no control? Such as age, genetic diabetes, asthma, etc.?

What specific policies, if any, do you think we should adopt regarding such people?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jabin said:

What do you think is the percentage of people > 65 who are overweight?

What do you think is the percentage of people > 65 who are overweight have successfully gotten down to a BMI of 25 or less and kept it off for 3 years or more?

And do you agree that some people have comorbidities over which they have no control? Such as age, genetic diabetes, asthma, etc.?

What specific policies, if any, do you think we should adopt regarding such people?
High % but the whole population is fat, by choice. That's personal responsibility.

Yes, people have comorbidities. My larger point is that if people would simply lose weight, you would dramatically decrease the severity of COVID by default. Being fat is the underlying cause for most of the other comorbidities. Half the deaths from COVID are fat people.

If people would simply not be fat, then the numbers with this virus are flu-like or less and none of us would have ever really cared about it.

For old people specifically, then I would recommend the vaccine to lessen severity if/when you catch it and plan ahead for figuring out quick access to the many therapeutics that are coming online. I would recommend the vaccine for them primarily because the odds of you being dead from old age will happen before any unknown, long-term effects from the vaccine happen.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jabin said:

What do you think is the percentage of people > 65 who are overweight?

What do you think is the percentage of people > 65 who are overweight have successfully gotten down to a BMI of 25 or less and kept it off for 3 years or more?

And do you agree that some people have comorbidities over which they have no control? Such as age, genetic diabetes, asthma, etc.?

What specific policies, if any, do you think we should adopt regarding such people?


They can get vaccinated and as many boosters as they want. It's not my responsibility to keep them safe, and no "policy" should be implemented beyond having vaccines and whatever treatments can be developed available. Have "policies" kept them safe so far?
Ag-ME
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
beerad12man said:

Jabin said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

agforlife97 said:

Vaccines don't prevent you from getting covid or transmitting it, apparently, so herd immunity may not be possible until everyone gets infected, and maybe not even then. Probably covid will mutate over time and become less deadly and then it will be over.
For everyone not working in a covid unit, it's already over. You just have to stop living differently than you did before.
How can you possibly make that assertion? I just attended the memorial service for a 65 year old retired Marine who died of Covid. Try telling him and his family that "it's already over".
Any loss of life is terrible, especially due to anything other than being 90 years old. Although much less, some people will die of covid 15 years from now. Will it not be over then, if you happen to know one of them?

When people say it's over, they mean from a behavioral standpoint. At this point, there's no reason why people should be required to alter their behavior to protect others any more. One can argue we should have never been made to do so, but that's a different point, and either way, it's especially true now.

The data on how to protect yourself is on the table. Use it or don't.


There is data and then there is data. I and many others have now had covid even though I was fully vaccinated.
The vaccinated aren't immune to the disease as some data or information would suggest. But luckily most cases are mild and I and everyone I know is fine. Herd immunity will eventually get where most people will stop worrying about it.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not sure why we even keep having the conversation around whether or not the vaccinated can transmit Covid. They can and health authorities have acknowledged it.
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll consider it over when we live life like we did in Feb 2020. That means no masks anywhere (I fly a lot) and we aren't testing healthy people.
agforlife97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

I'm not sure why we even keep having the conversation around whether or not the vaccinated can transmit Covid. They can and health authorities have acknowledged it.
I just have a really hard time understanding why you would do a vax mandate in light of that. Doesn't seem rational. Yeah, you should get the vax to lower your risk, but I mean, you can shoot yourself too. Don't see how someone not getting the vax affects me or the rest of society.
Jabin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Don't see how someone not getting the vax affects me or the rest of society.
Really?

Can you see how whether a motorcyclist wearing a helmet or not could affect you or the rest of society?
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agforlife97 said:

YouBet said:

I'm not sure why we even keep having the conversation around whether or not the vaccinated can transmit Covid. They can and health authorities have acknowledged it.
I just have a really hard time understanding why you would do a vax mandate in light of that. Doesn't seem rational. Yeah, you should get the vax to lower your risk, but I mean, you can shoot yourself too. Don't see how someone not getting the vax affects me or the rest of society.

I assume you're for legalizing all drugs? I'm not for mandates, this is about your final sentence.
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jabin said:

Mark Fairchild said:

People die. Regardless of what we as a modern society believe, we will die.
Thanks for pointing that out. I must somehow have overlooked that.

Again, that is not at all what the discussion was about, but thanks anyhow for your philosophical point.


So what is your solution, besides being a jackass and using your friends death as some sort of guilt/fear tactic.
Jabin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PearlJammin said:

Jabin said:

Mark Fairchild said:

People die. Regardless of what we as a modern society believe, we will die.
Thanks for pointing that out. I must somehow have overlooked that.

Again, that is not at all what the discussion was about, but thanks anyhow for your philosophical point.


So what is your solution, besides being a jackass and using your friends death as some sort of guilt/fear tactic.
Well, if being a jackass is pointing out others' pedantic non sequiturs, then I guess I am.

And solution to what? All I'm pointing out is that it's silly to say it's "over" when clearly it's not. Just look at any data collection and people are still being hospitalized and dying of Covid (although, thankfully, at a lower rate than earlier). As I've said repeatedly, I'm not arguing for or against any particular policy position. I'm simply arguing that it's silly and false to state that Covid is "over". As others have said on this thread, it won't be over until it becomes endemic and, perhaps, it no longer presents a threat of hospitalization and/or death to a significant percentage of the population.

And how did I use my acquaintance's death as a guilt/fear tactic? I just pointed it out as evidence that Covid is not over.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.