*****Aggies vs. Mississippi State - SEC Tournament 1st Round*****

73,093 Views | 800 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by dermdoc
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
billydean05 said:

Great game! Pitching was horribly mismanaged. Hopefully we can win the next four with Moss, Lamkin, Patton, and Johnny fulstaff


I remember my first Boone's farm.
Gyles Marrett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trouble said:

billydean05 said:

Great game! Pitching was horribly mismanaged. Hopefully we can win the next four with Moss, Lamkin, Patton, and Johnny fulstaff


What would you have done? I need to hear this.
I think some just have the natural reaction now to say it was mismanaged lol....No to mention if we get far enough in this tournament all the guys that threw today (even Praeger if needed for an inning or so) could pitch by the weekend. Most of those relievers will be able to pitch Friday again no problem.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trouble said:

billydean05 said:

Great game! Pitching was horribly mismanaged. Hopefully we can win the next four with Moss, Lamkin, Patton, and Johnny fulstaff


What would you have done? I need to hear this.
Well some folks were calling to pull Prager after the second inning and hope the pen could get us through the rest of the game in hopers of starting Prager on Sunday if we get there. In other words they were thinking about step 2563 instead of step one.

IMO the bully was used exactly as it should have been once we got the lead. Rode Prager as long a possible and did not use anyone else so much that they are not available later in the week. Except for possibly Freshcorn, the whole pen is available against Auburn tomorrow.
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Love that we didn't burn anymore pitching than we needed.

Got some late insurance runs instead of failing to manufacture anything.

Prager had a game.

Overall just real nice to play on. Keep it going!!
trouble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gyles Marrett said:

trouble said:

billydean05 said:

Great game! Pitching was horribly mismanaged. Hopefully we can win the next four with Moss, Lamkin, Patton, and Johnny fulstaff


What would you have done? I need to hear this.
I think some just have the natural reaction now to say it was mismanaged lol....No to mention if we get far enough in this tournament all the guys that threw today (even Praeger if needed for an inning or so) could pitch by the weekend. Most of those relievers will be able to pitch Friday again no problem.


I can see the negative set saying it was mismanaged (even if I disagree) but horribly mismanaged is laughable.
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jkag89 said:

trouble said:

billydean05 said:

Great game! Pitching was horribly mismanaged. Hopefully we can win the next four with Moss, Lamkin, Patton, and Johnny fulstaff


What would you have done? I need to hear this.
Well some folks were calling to pull Prager after the second inning and hope the pen could get us through the rest of the game in hopers of starting Prager on Sunday if we get there. In other words they were thinking about step 2563 instead of step one.

IMO the bully was used exactly as it should have been once we got the lead. Rode Prager as long a possible and did not use anyone else so much that they are not available later in the week. Except for possibly Freshcorn, the whole pen is available against Auburn tomorrow.
And if the skipper would have done that and lost that game... torches from those same folks.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So I think the game being moved has set us up to maybe make a run.

But an added bonus is not having Tom Hart announce our first two games.
flakrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Way to go Ags. Gotta admit, I was pretty worried going into this game with how both teams were trending!
trouble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And when the pen gave it up, they'd be screaming to fire the coaches before they got on the plane.
Gyles Marrett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LB12Diamond said:

So I think the game being moved has set us up to maybe make a run.

But an added bonus is not having Tom Hart announce our first two games.
Tom Hart comes across as a guy that make finger gun with a wink at himself in bathroom mirrors.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, those posts were so dumb.

My response was just.

NO

They were probably the same posters who yesterday were saying don't start Prager today.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't want to think what he might do in public bathrooms with his hands.
Sea Pony 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There was a catastrophe my freshman year of college on moveout day that resulted in EMS being called, which just happened to be my sibling on arrival. When he got there he asked if I had been drinking and I said "No, I drank a bottle of Boone's Farm, but that doesn't even count at this point."
billydean05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As I said in inning three of the game. You have to pull Prager after three innings and 50 pitches and save him for Sunday and rely on Rudis or Lyons for extended work with an eight run lead. Now Prager is unavailable for the rest of the tournament and we traded Prager's availability for Rudis or Lyons not a smart decision.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
billydean05 said:

As I said in inning three of the game. You have to pull Prager after three innings and 50 pitches and save him for Sunday and rely on Rudis or Lyons for extended work with an eight run lead. Now Prager is unavailable for the rest of the tournament and we traded Prager's availability for Rudis or Lyons not a smart decision.
It's easy to say in hindsight, but if you removed a cruising Prager and the bullpen faltered it would have been foolish.
AgEng06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
billydean05 said:

As I said in inning three of the game. You have to pull Prager after three innings and 50 pitches and save him for Sunday and rely on Rudis or Lyons for extended work with an eight run lead. Now Prager is unavailable for the rest of the tournament and we traded Prager's availability for Rudis or Lyons not a smart decision.
And had he pulled Prager and we lost, would you still say it was the right decision?
MosesHallRAB04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgEng06 said:

billydean05 said:

As I said in inning three of the game. You have to pull Prager after three innings and 50 pitches and save him for Sunday and rely on Rudis or Lyons for extended work with an eight run lead. Now Prager is unavailable for the rest of the tournament and we traded Prager's availability for Rudis or Lyons not a smart decision.
And had he pulled Prager and we lost, would you still say it was the right decision?


And if Prager was pulled and he comes back on short rest, which he hasn't done all year, and isn't effective what then?
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
billydean05 said:

As I said in inning three of the game. You have to pull Prager after three innings and 50 pitches and save him for Sunday and rely on Rudis or Lyons for extended work with an eight run lead. Now Prager is unavailable for the rest of the tournament and we traded Prager's availability for Rudis or Lyons not a smart decision.


You have to win today, bro.
trouble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And if you don't win this one, there's not a Sunday game.

swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sunday is actually a long way away.
Lance Uppercut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SEC teams can score a lot of runs fast, and we don't have a lot of data pointing to holding leads with the bullpen. I don't have a problem with using Prager to make sure you secured today's game.
trouble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Horribly long away.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
billydean05 said:

As I said in inning three of the game. You have to pull Prager after three innings and 50 pitches and save him for Sunday and rely on Rudis or Lyons for extended work with an eight run lead. Now Prager is unavailable for the rest of the tournament and we traded Prager's availability for Rudis or Lyons not a smart decision.
It is one thing to have the opinion that this is the way to go, it is quite another to claim that the bully was horribly mismanaged.
billydean05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prager only got seven more outs. I think are odds are much better to win that game with Rudis or Lyons getting extended work then the SEC championship game Sunday. We have to win them all not just the first one.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2.1 innings isn't nothing when it comes to using bullpen arms.
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
billydean05 said:

As I said in inning three of the game. You have to pull Prager after three innings and 50 pitches and save him for Sunday and rely on Rudis or Lyons for extended work with an eight run lead. Now Prager is unavailable for the rest of the tournament and we traded Prager's availability for Rudis or Lyons not a smart decision.
This team and this point in the season... I totally disagree. Prager has no guarantee to be effective on his next start regardless of when it is. He's been so up and down. On shorter rest, I think you'd expect even less from him. And I'd take "good Prager" right now for 50 more pitches over "short rest Prager" in a few days to go who knows how long.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
billydean05 said:

Prager only got seven more outs. I think are odds are much better to win that game with Rudis or Lyons getting extended work then the SEC championship game Sunday. We have to win them all not just the first one.
Since you have this opinion, have you even looked into how effectively Prager has bounced back on short rest and if a less extended outing made a difference or not?

Edit: Those 7 outs probably means one more arm out of the bully today or at very least limiting who we can use tomorrow.
phatty26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeff Head misses another call.
trouble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Water is wet
ensign_beedrill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lance Uppercut said:

SEC teams can score a lot of runs fast, and we don't have a lot of data pointing to holding leads with the bullpen. I don't have a problem with using Prager to make sure you secured today's game.
Also, Prager has been inconsistent this year. I'd much rather keep him going on a certified good day than pull him and risk Sunday being a bad day... if we even get that far.
nothingbutlove
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This thread was kinda reasonable.

Is it because people are at work and/or sober?

I could get used to it.
billydean05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jkag89 said:

billydean05 said:

Prager only got seven more outs. I think are odds are much better to win that game with Rudis or Lyons getting extended work then the SEC championship game Sunday. We have to win them all not just the first one.
Since you have this opinion, have you even looked into how effectively Prager has bounced back on short rest and if a less extended outing made a difference or not?

Edit: Those 7 outs probably means one more arm out of the bully today or at very least limiting who we can use tomorrow.
We will not be using Rudis or Lyons tomorrow unless things are really, really bad. They are not one of our top 3 relievers that we typically turn to later in ballgames.
trouble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1. It was mostly the die-hards

2. We got ahead early
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The crazies typically stay away when we win.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.