I'm going with #20. Or do we drop further given the losing trend seems to be picking up momentum?
Basketball is not missing the tournament lol#Mke said:
Basketball might fall from #7 to unranked in two weeks, and somehow might actually be outdone by Aggie Baseball who should fall from #1 to unranked in two weeks.
Baseball probably won't, but 5-4 vs poor competition is the worst start through nine games I ever remember seeing from a preseason #1 in the history of college athletics.
Oh and let's not forget about Football!
What is wrong with our school?!?
Thankfully Basketball had a good enough start to (probably) still make the Tournament, but my goodness are we trying hard to squander it.
Literally no one was saying we were a two seed lock. What are you talking about?bigfooticus said:
And from a tourney 2 seed 'lock' to ???? Where is the floor?!
Zachary Klement said:Literally no one was saying we were a two seed lock. What are you talking about?bigfooticus said:
And from a tourney 2 seed 'lock' to ???? Where is the floor?!
Correct. At that time, we were projected to be a two seed. Nobody who actively follows or covers college hoops had us as a lock to be a two seed.TAMUallen said:Zachary Klement said:Literally no one was saying we were a two seed lock. What are you talking about?bigfooticus said:
And from a tourney 2 seed 'lock' to ???? Where is the floor?!
Every freaking bracket prediction had us at 2. Don't try and pass it off like we were not the 100% a 2 seed before falling off
Zachary Klement said:Correct. At that time, we were projected to be a two seed. Nobody who actively follows or covers college hoops had us as a lock to be a two seed.TAMUallen said:Zachary Klement said:Literally no one was saying we were a two seed lock. What are you talking about?bigfooticus said:
And from a tourney 2 seed 'lock' to ???? Where is the floor?!
Every freaking bracket prediction had us at 2. Don't try and pass it off like we were not the 100% a 2 seed before falling off
TAMUallen said:Zachary Klement said:Correct. At that time, we were projected to be a two seed. Nobody who actively follows or covers college hoops had us as a lock to be a two seed.TAMUallen said:Zachary Klement said:Literally no one was saying we were a two seed lock. What are you talking about?bigfooticus said:
And from a tourney 2 seed 'lock' to ???? Where is the floor?!
Every freaking bracket prediction had us at 2. Don't try and pass it off like we were not the 100% a 2 seed before falling off
It's all hypothetical and yes we were a lock at a 2 before we tumbled. There was no debate on if we would or should have been a 2 seed... that's how lock is used and it assumes a team doesn't self implode. Not sure why this is an issue...does it hurt the positivity?
I guess we have a different idea of what a lock is considered to be.TAMUallen said:Zachary Klement said:Correct. At that time, we were projected to be a two seed. Nobody who actively follows or covers college hoops had us as a lock to be a two seed.TAMUallen said:Zachary Klement said:Literally no one was saying we were a two seed lock. What are you talking about?bigfooticus said:
And from a tourney 2 seed 'lock' to ???? Where is the floor?!
Every freaking bracket prediction had us at 2. Don't try and pass it off like we were not the 100% a 2 seed before falling off
It's all hypothetical and yes we were a lock at a 2 before we tumbled. There was no debate on if we would or should have been a 2 seed... that's how lock is used and it assumes a team doesn't self implode. Not sure why this is an issue...does it hurt the positivity?