Three UCLA players arrested in China for shoplifting

20,468 Views | 149 Replies | Last: 8 yr ago by Bunk Moreland
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The public press conference today with the suspended UCLA players making apology statements and coach Alford also making a statement.

The players are currently suspended indefinitely from all team activities, including workouts or practices. But are being allowed to stay enrolled in school and continue their academics.

My rough guess on 'best case' for these 3 young men. I think the remainder of the Fall semester minimum they will be out of basketball. But if they do everything they are told and don't even spit on a side walk somewhere, maybe start of Spring semester would be allowed back on the team and participate again in practices.

Obviously, they would be significantly behind at that point so it would probably take some decent time after rejoining practices (and again them remaining angel citizens) for them to be in a position to actually enter a game. So I'd be a bit surprised if any of these guys sniffed a court until maybe February at earliest and it wouldn't surprise me at all if they end up sitting out the entire season. Maybe redshirting or a transfer might also happen, but we'll see.

This was obviously a very unusually PUBLIC embarrassment to the school and pulled in everybody from the coaches to the AD to the Pac-12 commissioner to the U.S. State department to even POTUS. So while they are not getting expelled or losing their scholarship apparently, which they should feel lucky about, I don't think they are going to get off very 'light' in this either.

CactusThomas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess Lavar was right - "it ain't that big a deal".
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pumpkinhead said:

The public press conference today with the suspended UCLA players making apology statements and coach Alford also making a statement.

The players are currently suspended indefinitely from all team activities, including workouts or practices. But are being allowed to stay enrolled in school and continue their academics.

My rough guess on 'best case' for these 3 young men. I think the remainder of the Fall semester minimum they will be out of basketball. But if they do everything they are told and don't even spit on a side walk somewhere, maybe start of Spring semester would be allowed back on the team and participate again in practices.

Obviously, they would be significantly behind at that point so it would probably take some decent time after rejoining practices (and again them remaining angel citizens) for them to be in a position to actually enter a game. So I'd be a bit surprised if any of these guys sniffed a court until maybe February at earliest and it wouldn't surprise me at all if they end up sitting out the entire season. Maybe redshirting or a transfer might also happen, but we'll see.

This was obviously a very unusually PUBLIC embarrassment to the school and pulled in everybody from the coaches to the AD to the Pac-12 commissioner to the U.S. State department to even POTUS. So while they are not getting expelled or losing their scholarship apparently, which they should feel lucky about, I don't think they are going to get off very 'light' in this either.


That's a nice summation.

Along those same lines, I knew the Chinese government wasn't going to go so far as to prosecute. Governments are made up of humans, and all humans are alike, they will act in there own self interest first. The Chinese government saw a grand opportunity to be seen as the "magnificent and benevolent giver".
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?





94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A&M had a player named Freddie Ricks, a good SWC player from '87 - '91, who also happened to "lead his team in steals." I believe he was suspended for a semester his senior year for similar behavior.
Hop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
94chem said:

A&M had a player named Freddie Ricks, a good SWC player from '87 - '91, who also happened to "lead his team in steals." I believe he was suspended for a semester his senior year for similar behavior.


Calling him a good SWC player is being very generous.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Calling him a good SWC player is being very generous.
109 games, 959 points, 50% career shooter. He was the basketball version of Ty Garner - a good player, but not a star, on some mostly below-average teams.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
94chem said:

Quote:

Calling him a good SWC player is being very generous.
109 games, 959 points, 50% career shooter. He was the basketball version of Ty Garner - a good player, but not a star, on some mostly below-average teams.
looked him up out of curiosity. Beyond the points, he's top 20/25 all-time SEC in steals and assists.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is Trump still tweeting about this because he didn't achieve much else on the trip?
jdgaucho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CactusThomas said:

I guess Lavar was right - "it ain't that big a deal".

He did say LiAngelo was going to be a 1-and-done player...
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jdgaucho said:

CactusThomas said:

I guess Lavar was right - "it ain't that big a deal".

He did say LiAngelo was going to be a 1-and-done player...

He's smoking crack. LiAngelo is nowhere near good enough to be 1 and done. Possibly not even after 4 years...but that's a long time to improve.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.