MooreTrucker said:
I read something about lower alcohol content also = more sugar.
Lower alcohol can mean that the grapes weren't fermented to dryness, i.e. not all of the fermentable sugars were fermented into alcohol. However, lower alcohol can also indicate less ripe (under ripe) grapes. Oddly enough, IMO so many 2015 Napa cabs are so palpably sweet is the the hot growing season and resulting early harvest resulted in some harvesting their grapes at much higher sugar levels than normal and struggling to ferment to dryness. So even 15% alcohol wine can still have some residual sugar. And new ttb rules limit "table wine" to 16% alcohol, so there's a monetary (tax) reason to keep their wine under 16%.
But I'm not aware of any way to know which lower end producers add sugar. In California, I think it's way more than we'd like to know. Same with oak alternatives (staves, chips, powders). A recent article polling producers indicated that at $25 and below it's likely that oak alternatives are used. They didn't poll sugar, since almost no one will admit to it. Kinda like all that Mega Purple sold in the market that nobody seems to use!
And 1000x yes to the Wagner stuff. To be fair I've not tasted Caymus since that infamous 2012 40th anniversary vintage, which was so sweet I swear it was their Conundrum red just relabeled.