Aggie12B said:
It's all just lip service; NOTHING is really going to change
Let's hope you are wrong. There are numerous, actionable recommendations listed the report. Two division commanders will no longer command (I assume). I'd bet SECARMY will assign a task force to implement changes and/or recommendations listed in the report. Congress is going to ensure changes as well.
All that said, all leaders at echelon should be the ones making the changes - this doesn't start and end with senior leaders at the GO level.
Fort Hood ReportFinding #1: The Implementation Of The SHARP Program At Fort Hood Has Been Ineffective, Due To A Command Climate That Failed To Instill SHARP Program Core Values Below The Brigade Level.
Finding #2: There Is Strong Evidence That Incidents Of Sexual Assault And Sexual Harassment At Fort Hood Are Significantly Underreported.
Finding #3: The Army SHARP Program Is Structurally Flawed.
Finding #4: The Fort Hood CID Office Had Various Inefficiencies That Adversely Impacted Accomplishment Of Its Mission.
Finding #5: The Mechanics Of The Army's Adjudication Processes Involving Sexual Assault And Sexual Harassment Degrade Confidence In The SHARP Program.
Finding #6: Fort Hood Public Relations & Incident Management Have Deficiencies.
Finding #7: There Were No Established Procedures For First Line Supervisors In 'Failure to Report' Situations That Define Appropriate Actions In The Critical First 24 Hours.
Finding #8: The Criminal Environment Within Surrounding Cities And Counties Is Commensurate With Or Lower Than Similar Sized Areas: However, There Are Unaddressed Crime Problems On Fort Hood, Because The Installation Is In A Fully Reactive Posture. F
inding #9: The Command Climate At Fort Hood Has Been Permissive Of Sexual Harassment / Sexual Assault.