For those of you sick of this thread, sorry for blimping it

It IS the offseason still.
quote:
The idea that the OU rivalry is football only is BS. Only t-shirt UT fans would say that. The football game definitely has more media attention(name, location etc.), but as an actual Longhorn I can promise you the vitriol is no les in the other sports. We hate them.
We hate tceh but we don't claim a rivalry with them. From another thread.....
quote:
Harry Stone
posted 1:33p, 6/13/2007
sips claim their big rival is OU. is this for football only or for everything?
quote:
Authentic Horn
posted 2:18p, 06/13/07
only football.
He agrees with me. And he's not the only one.
quote:
Like I said I think they are equally big, just different
Agreed. Like I said before, one is university vs university and the other sport vs sport. Of course I claim football only, you claim all sports, but whatever.
quote:
You are reading way too much into that quote. That is from a sociological researcher. It is not making a historical statement. Rather saying that it’s a rival, and both have big unique things to mark it. It was not a response to the bonfire. That simply isn’t historically accurate.
Truth is I added links to articles on utexas.edu for added effect. I knew of this type of stuff anyway and didn't want to just 'say' stuff without anything to back me up. Facts being A&M had a pregame activity for the tu game, tu did not have something in the reverse, so they created one. I don't think it matters whether A&M had a parade, a bonfire or a concert before the tu game, it's not a stretch to think that tu created it to have something of their own. The writer wasn't completely speculating that in the article.
Whether it was intended to COUNTER the bonfire or not, that's what ended up happening through the years. It was tu's pregame activity FOR A&M and still is.
quote:
There are 2 rivals. I would say sport by sport OU is bigger, day in day out A&M is. It’s a push.
At least you are almost on track with me with this statement. A&M/tu is everyday and OU/tu is sports only, I'll give you some credit here.
But what happens in a year like 2006 when A&M beats tu in more sports than OU?
The very fact that A&M has not, as you claim, been as competitive as OU througout the years but yet maintained an equal rivalry with tu is pretty impressive. It backs what I've said which is it's more than sports with A&M/tu. Imagine if A&M beat tu in everything every year, OU would be a distant memory right? Because A&M already has the everyday rivalry, but it would also have the sport by sport to boot

The laughable thing here is the SUPPORT for how much of a rival OU is to tu. Why would you be proud of that anyway? tu has the series edge over OU and A&M both, true, but at least A&M's academic standards are more like tu's and A&M and tu are closer in size and overall respectability. It's like if A&M had a rivalry with tu AND tceh and Aggies were bragging about how much better our rivalry with tceh is than tu. Is that a good thing?