Muslims are just going too far now!

8,215 Views | 295 Replies | Last: 20 yr ago by Disassociated
midtown-texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Muslims kill and persecute Christians in their home countries, while demanding their religious freedoms in the civilized world.

this is a fact


Americans kill and persecute Muslims in their home countries, while demanding recognition of their goodness and charity in the civilized world.

this is a fact
midtown-texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Every day in America, a majority Christian nation, people do and say things that are sacreligous or diametrically opposed to the tenants of Christianity, and no one bats an eyeball.


You don't even have to look past this message board's reaction to me posting links to news stories to see that you're full of ****. You are simply in denial.

quote:
In Islamic societies, even small variances from radical dogma will get you tortured and killed.


To say you are overstating your case is putting it mildly. Does it happen? Absolutely. There are some terrible tyrants out there (like our friends in Saudi Arabia), but to pretend like it's uniform across the Muslim world is just stupid.

quote:
If he had done something similar in Saudi Arabia, he'd have been castrated and set on fire in the public square.


That's true, but when did I say anything different?

It's telling to me that you have to go off-topic to make an argument.

Christians make death threats, just like Muslims do.
West Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Christians make death threats, just like Muslims do.


Ahhhh, so we're back to jaywalkers = murderers.
AngeloHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amercican do not persecute Muslims, you fvucking limp-wristed ****bag.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
midtown-texan,
you're silly.

why don't you go google a little bit. Try some phrases like "muslim mob" or "christian persecution" or "muslim persecution" or "christian mob."


midtown-texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No one bats an eyeball, eh West Horn?

"YOU ****ING DOUCHBAG ***GOT ***** ***** ******* I AM NOT VIOLENT I WILL ****ING STAB YOU ****ER ***GOT *****!!"
West Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
No one bats an eyeball, eh West Horn?


Please lay out your case that American law and society is governed by strict adherence to Biblical law.

I'm all ears and, as always, will gladly change my opinion if proven wrong.
midtown-texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do all nations with a majority of Muslims have law guided strictly by the Koran?

You can't address the topic so you sidetrack into other matters. I never said that American law was strictly Biblical.
West Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I swear, it's like arguing with a retard.

quote:
You can't address the topic so you sidetrack into other matters.


Dude, YOU ARE AN IDIOT. Let me spell it out.

Topic:

Whether Western society, the USA in particular, and modern Christianity is the moral equivalent of radical Islam (i.e., the brand advocated by Bin Laden).

Me: No.

You: Yes.

You have already lost. You will continue to get owned.

Make your case, if you can.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muslims find justification in their scriptures to persecute non-muslims, and there are always religious leaders standing by to whip people into a bloodthirsty frenzy. The Governments, even the arabic "non-theocracy," do not want to challenge the religoius leaders.

There is no parallel in modern Christianity.
midtown-texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All you are dealing in is moral equivalency.

Nothing is identical, but the idea that there are strong fundamental differences is ridiculous. We have similar fundamentalist relgious movements who value violence and extreme nationalism. We just have a lot better weapons, more money and we're a lot safer in our homes. Those are the real differences.

Strict adherence to utopian ideals, be they Christian or Muslim, have deleterious effects on societies, especially if they act militarily to attempt to achieve these utopias.

Islam is on a different part of the cycle than Christianity at this point in time, but both ridiculous mindsets that, throughout their histories, have fluctuated in what they considered proper to spread their fantasy stories.


TVM:

Does it bother you that you can't just say "Christianity" and that you have to say "modern Christianity"?

Doesn't it make my argument for me?

[This message has been edited by midtown-texan (edited 2/3/2006 10:47a).]
West Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Does it bother you that you can't just say "Christianity" and that you have to say "modern Christianity"?

Doesn't it make my argument for me?


No it doesn't bother me. It was a pre-emptive measure so that you didn't start irrelevantly blathering on about the crusades in a weak attempt to hide the fact that your argument is flimsy and without merit.

As for making your argument for you, wtf? I don't know whether to laugh or pound my head against my desk.

[This message has been edited by West Horn (edited 2/3/2006 10:52a).]
threesheets
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is mind blowing how ignorant some of you people are.
midtown-texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
West Horn:

Can you dispute anything I have said or do you have nothing but ad hominem to lean against?

I can't wait for your next hyper-intellectual counter-argument. Let me see if I can get it started "I am laughing because you're so dumb!"

You would be fantastic in a real debate, the whole "You're wrong because you're a stupid-face" thing really goes over well in formal debate.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
midtown

before people could read, and before the printing press, the Bible was in the hands of just a few. It was used to herd people around.

As soon as any moron could actually read the New Testament it became obvious that Christians are not encouraged to commit acts of violence in God's name.

Did you google "muslim mob" yet?
West Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Nothing is identical, but the idea that there are strong fundamental differences is ridiculous.


And there it is. THANK YOU for stating it so plainly. I've responded to this point in my previous posts, so I'll let them stand.


quote:
We have similar fundamentalist relgious movements who value violence and extreme nationalism. We just have a lot better weapons, more money and we're a lot safer in our homes. Those are the real differences.

Strict adherence to utopian ideals, be they Christian or Muslim, have deleterious effects on societies, especially if they act militarily to attempt to achieve these utopias.

Islam is on a different part of the cycle than Christianity at this point in time, but both ridiculous mindsets that, throughout their histories, have fluctuated in what they considered proper to spread their fantasy stories.


While lots of that means nothing to me (you need to learn how to express your thoughts more clearly), what I can gather is ridiculous.

I'll close with this:

Reasonable people can and do disagree about how to deal with radical Islam (i.e.,whether a militaristic approach is best, whether we should have invaded Iraq, etc).

But the moral equivalency you've argued is simply not taken seriously in public discourse because it is ridiculous on its face. I'm sort of ashamed that I wasted so much time arguing it.....I feel like I've been debating with someone who believes the Earth is flat. Maybe lay off the Chomsky for a while.

[This message has been edited by West Horn (edited 2/3/2006 11:02a).]
FXST
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Update:

More european papers printed the pictures today in a gesture of solidarity to freedom of speech. Even the AAS ran the pictures today. It doesn't look like the west is caving in to their demands just yet.

"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others!"
Groucho
West Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Can you dispute anything I have said or do you have nothing but ad hominem to lean against?

I can't wait for your next hyper-intellectual counter-argument. Let me see if I can get it started "I am laughing because you're so dumb!"

You would be fantastic in a real debate, the whole "You're wrong because you're a stupid-face" thing really goes over well in formal debate.



*sigh*

I have refuted the point that radical Islam and the US/Christianity are not two sides of the same coin in previous posts.

I also addressed this topic in even greater detail in a previous "discussion" with you where I was a lot more civil and regimented in laying out my thoughts.

But I concede that I have been rude in this thread because (1) I have dismissed you as someone to be taken seriously given the previous thread, and (2) your inability to stay on topic has frustrated me.

I apologize for any rudeness.

I actually have to get some work done now, but just out of curiousity, what exactly do you do, and what did you study at Texas?
midtown-texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TVM:

quote:
As soon as any moron could actually read the New Testament it became obvious that Christians are not encouraged to commit acts of violence in God's name.


And many Muslims say the same thing and that those who are violent are perverting the Koran, just like Christians who say the guys who shoot abortion doctors in the face are perverting the Bible.

It's all bull****, of course, so the "well it may sound similar but our storybook is the right one!" can be saved for people who like to get in the "Dr. Suess is better than Shel Silverstein" debate.

The fact is that practical concerns motivate human action, religious belief doesn't do much as a motivator but works well to dehumanize the enemy and provide a comforting idea of after-death reward. The Bible and the Koran both work well here.

American Christianity has no reason to be anything but mostly peaceful. We're fat, rich and amazingly secure. Obviously we find other outlets for our violent idealism, but it's a lot different than what you see in other places where enabling-religion and motivating-practicality collide. That's only logical.

quote:
Did you google "muslim mob" yet?


Who needs a mob of rock-throwers when you've got billions in hardware?


West Horn:

quote:
Reasonable people can and do disagree about how to deal with radical Islam (i.e.,whether a militaristic approach is best, whether we should have invaded Iraq, etc).

But the moral equivalency you've argued is simply not taken seriously in public discourse because it is ridiculous on its face. I'm sort of ashamed that I wasted so much time arguing it.....I feel like I've been debating with someone who believes the Earth is flat.


For all your chest-pounding about how great you are at debate I was honestly expecting a lot more of you. You seemed so eager to make an argument yet all you have is to dismiss arguments outright.

quote:
I have refuted the point that radical Islam and the US/Christianity are not two sides of the same coin in previous posts.


Simple repetition is not an argument, it is just repetition. And condescension is no substitute for intelligence. You convince no one but yourself and ignorant dittoheads who are among the same ilk who write the death threats you try and pretend don't exist.

Strenuous belief in fantastical utopias can be very dangerous whatever you call them: Christianity, Islam or a single political world order.

In America we're expected to think that belief in such fantasy is commendable, even desireable.
West Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Last post. These statements are a microcosm of my point:

quote:
Every day in America, a majority Christian nation, people do and say things that are sacrilegous or diametrically opposed to the tenants of Christianity, and no one bats an eyeball, because we are a free society. In Islamic societies, even small variances from radical dogma will get you tortured and killed.

"Piss Christ" was a big story because it was funded with taxpayer money. The artist is likely still smoking pot in the Village and churning out "provocative" tripe. That's America. If he had done something similar in Saudi Arabia, he'd have been castrated and set on fire in the public square. That's the difference.


quote:
Radical Muslims want the world to be the kind of place where women are beaten with razor wire for stepping outside without a male family member. They also believe that it is their mission as Muslims to spark a religious war to kill everyone on the planet who does not believe in those views. 9-11 was the first major shot in that war.

If Christians are engaging in similar acts I'm unaware; you'll have to clue me in.



Also, you can pull up and reference the previous thread I mentioned, if you want.

Again, sorry for the rudeness.

[This message has been edited by West Horn (edited 2/3/2006 11:33a).]
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
midtown, I don't have a problem with your reference to any scripture as "storybook."

You're just being a moron when you group these two theologies together. Aside from being monotheistic and having an origin in judaism, there is a huge divergence between the two. This is true even if it doesn't fit into your personal worldview and theories on organized religion.

good luck in life.
Troy McClure
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I think we are finding common ground with our Islamic Brethren.
IIIHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Caption for the above pic ...

'Sunni Play Station'

~(%^D)

HRLIII

His Royal Lameness has spoken!

( ...voice punctuated with a clap of distant thunder... )
CajunAg97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Someone prints a cartoon in their own country, and these muslims want "death" to the entire country?! The muslim world better wake up....
Troy McClure
How long do you want to ignore this user?


They are no different from Christians[/midtown]
Easy 8
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I got a kick out of this:

cache.gettyimages.com/xc/56736646.jpg?v=1&c=MS_GINS&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF19390335F8FA9CA92A6C811C71B62908C994EF3EA9A178B7582

No doubt that the irony of that sign is completely lost on those backwater ***s.
midtown-texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
You're just being a moron when you group these two theologies together. Aside from being monotheistic and having an origin in judaism, there is a huge divergence between the two. This is true even if it doesn't fit into your personal worldview and theories on organized religion.


The only real difference is what the adherents do. They are both ridiculous fantasy stories that tell the followers that they are going to heaven and the rest are hell-bound scum (and that all are worthless scum compared to the fictional deity). The entire point is dehumanization and the devaluation of human life, since all life exists at the whim of a fictional deity. They each contradict themselves in tone and theme, allowing adherents to pick and choose what they want and allowing for large apologetics movements within each.

A Christian can jump and shout "eye for an eye" then 2 minutes later talk about "turn the other cheek" and a Muslim can do the same stupid thing because they are placing their reliance not on intellect or common sense but on satisfying immediate, animalistic emotional desires with backing from fiction books.

You and I are horrified to see journalists kidnapped and killed abroad.
Many Muslism are horrified to see American soldiers driving tanks through their homeland.

I am not saying those two things are moral equivalents, but I am saying that the world is full of insanity and many people's solution to sorting things out is by ratcheting up the insanity by pounding their fiction book even harder.

Do you think it is coincidence that fundamentalist, emotionalist evangelical Christian movements are shooting through the roof right now?
Is it coincidence that the youth of Iran went from moving towards secular democracy to going right back to anti-West pro-Islamist sentiment during the exact same period of time?
All the while leaders from both sides constantly talk about all of this violence being signs of the end of time and return of whatever fictional being they claim fealty to?

Strict and unwavering adherence to utopian fantasy is a cancer in the human mind; call it Christian, call it Muslim, call it Communist Panacea.
Usually this cancer is benign, it sits having no real effect on life as people get dressed up and go to church to gossip about other people and form/break friendships and cry, mistaking the communal emotional release of a human collective for the invisble hand of god; a social function that helps lube the gears of society. One of the best ways of keeping people together is to tell that group they are special and better than other groups.

But when practical concerns lead to anger and violence it is often used to lube the gears of war to lead to more death and destruction; 70 virgins or a lifetime at Christ's right hand it's all the same when the goal is to pump yourself up and dehumanize your practical enemy.

That's why democracy is great, because every individual is, ideally, given the same amount of power no matter what they believe and if a lot of people believe the same thing then things move their way but things can easily shift the other way. Religion is antithetical to this, Soviet-style loyalty to political parties are also antithetical to this.

People should be allowed to believe whatever damned fool fantasy story they want to, but in times like these I do not feel it necessary to pretend that it is anything but counter-productive lunacy.
Jimmy Conway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A highly regarded and respected Muslim cleric Ayatollah Sistani issued this reaction:

quote:
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq’s top *****e cleric condemned the publication of caricatures of the Prophet Muhammed as angry Muslims protested across Asia on Friday. Several European newspapers defiantly reprinted the cartoons.

Iraq’s Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, however, made no call for protests and suggested that militant Muslims were partly to blame for distorting Islam’s image.

“We strongly denounce and condemn this horrific action,” al-Sistani said, alluding to the caricatures in remarks posted on his Web site and dated Jan. 31.

But al-Sistani, who wields enormous influence over Iraq’s majority *****es, also referred to “misguided and oppressive” segments of the Muslim community and said their actions “projected a distorted and dark image of the faith of justice, love and brotherhood.”


This guy is very highly regarded, and he's usually a reasonable voice in a part of the world that often is not very reasonable.



Troy McClure
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
it sits having no real effect on life as people get dressed up and go to church to gossip about other people and form/break friendships and cry, mistaking the communal emotional release of a human collective for the invisble hand of god;


For a "progressive" thinker you sure rely on stereotypes.
highwayman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IIIHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
The only real difference is what the adherents do. They are both ridiculous fantasy stories that tell the followers that they are going to heaven and the rest are hell-bound scum (and that all are worthless scum compared to the fictional deity). The entire point is dehumanization and the devaluation of human life, since all life exists at the whim of a fictional deity. They each contradict themselves in tone and theme, allowing adherents to pick and choose what they want and allowing for large apologetics movements within each.

A Christian can jump and shout "eye for an eye" then 2 minutes later talk about "turn the other cheek" and a Muslim can do the same stupid thing because they are placing their reliance not on intellect or common sense but on satisfying immediate, animalistic emotional desires with backing from fiction books.

You and I are horrified to see journalists kidnapped and killed abroad.
Many Muslism are horrified to see American soldiers driving tanks through their homeland.

I am not saying those two things are moral equivalents, but I am saying that the world is full of insanity and many people's solution to sorting things out is by ratcheting up the insanity by pounding their fiction book even harder.

Do you think it is coincidence that fundamentalist, emotionalist evangelical Christian movements are shooting through the roof right now?
Is it coincidence that the youth of Iran went from moving towards secular democracy to going right back to anti-West pro-Islamist sentiment during the exact same period of time?
All the while leaders from both sides constantly talk about all of this violence being signs of the end of time and return of whatever fictional being they claim fealty to?

Strict and unwavering adherence to utopian fantasy is a cancer in the human mind; call it Christian, call it Muslim, call it Communist Panacea.
Usually this cancer is benign, it sits having no real effect on life as people get dressed up and go to church to gossip about other people and form/break friendships and cry, mistaking the communal emotional release of a human collective for the invisble hand of god; a social function that helps lube the gears of society. One of the best ways of keeping people together is to tell that group they are special and better than other groups.

But when practical concerns lead to anger and violence it is often used to lube the gears of war to lead to more death and destruction; 70 virgins or a lifetime at Christ's right hand it's all the same when the goal is to pump yourself up and dehumanize your practical enemy.

That's why democracy is great, because every individual is, ideally, given the same amount of power no matter what they believe and if a lot of people believe the same thing then things move their way but things can easily shift the other way. Religion is antithetical to this, Soviet-style loyalty to political parties are also antithetical to this.

People should be allowed to believe whatever damned fool fantasy story they want to, but in times like these I do not feel it necessary to pretend that it is anything but counter-productive lunacy.


Cool!

Just by cut/paste I can double the length of this thread!

~(%^0)

HRLIII


His Royal Lameness has spoken!

( ...voice punctuated with a clap of distant thunder... )
Troy McClure
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stunned Jihaadist Pic
^
^
^
Stolen from the fark forum at allahfans.com

[This message has been edited by AggieWire89 (edited 2/3/2006 1:07p).]
moneyballs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
patch
ttechguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
People should be allowed to believe whatever damned fool fantasy story they want to, but in times like these I do not feel it necessary to pretend that it is anything but counter-productive lunacy.

I would say the exact same thing about your position.
midtown-texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I love the look on that guy's face. Better than the Torbush "WOW!".

quote:
For a "progressive" thinker you sure rely on stereotypes.


What is progressive about respecting foolishness?

I guess you're thinking about "politically correct". No, I guess I'm not that.

[This message has been edited by midtown-texan (edited 2/3/2006 1:29p).]
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.