Not too many surprises.

http://cbs.sportsline.com/collegefootball/story/8630578/rss

Okay, this guy is a moron.

He's got A&M ranked #15 and Texas Tech #24.

Stay tuned...

Aww....you don't like, Big 12-0? Seems about right to me

Big 12-0 - That's not too far off the composite poll. A&M is 17 and you guys are tied for 23rd.

Well, rankings are kind of subjective anyway. With the reasoning of the voters, Tech could finish third in the conference and A&M fourth and A&M could be ranked higher. Remember last year when Tech and A&M tied for third but Tech ended up ranked?

And for those who say A&M finished third and Tech fourth, just remember team names are placed in alphabetical order.

quote:

---

Okay, this guy is a moron.

He's got A&M ranked #15 and Texas Tech #24.

---

quote:

---

Big 12-0 - That's not too far off the composite poll. A&M is 17 and you guys are tied for 23rd.

---

quote:

---

Well, rankings are kind of subjective anyway.

---

hahahahahhahahahahah

we beat you

See, aggies37, thats my point.

A&M squeaked by Tech in overtime, we killed the #4 team in the nation, and were ranked and Aggies unranked.

Since Tech beat the #4 team, we should have finished ranked #3. And since A&M beat Tennessee...no, wait...

from what i remember the chant of "Over rated" was going on when you guys beat them..... hmmm you think maybe by a chance Cal was overrated thus you guys beating a suck ASS team?

Nope, Cal was not over-rated. They played USC to the last second and won the rest of their games. They just ran into an offensive juggernaut that was in its prime, but they were still a Top #5 team. Its just hard for Texas Tech, who was unfathombly lowly ranked, to leap into the Top Ten with such a commanding victory.

I hate it when your team chants "OVER-RATED" at the opponent, though. Its like saying "Hey, we are not that good but we are slaughtering you!"

[This message has been edited by Big 12-0 (edited 7/9/2005 4:24p).]

quote:

---

Nope, Cal was not over-rated. They played USC to the last second and won the rest of their games. They just ran into an offensive juggernaut that was in its prime, but they were still a Top #5 team. Its just hard for Texas Tech, who was unfathombly lowly ranked, to leap into the Top Ten with such a commanding victory.

---

So, by your logic, Tceh, who pounded Cal, would have also beaten USC because Cal almost beat USC. But then, how did you lose to OU, a team USC destroyed? Makes perfect sense....

That is why the game is played on the field. You see, USC, three out of five times, would probably beat Texas Tech. But who knows what would happen in regards to turnovers, etc. Intangibles make football great and that is why rankings are subjective.

Even A&M can beat Texas Tech 3 times in 10 years.

quote:

---

hmmm you think maybe by a chance Cal was overrated

---

The aggie story, until the subject switches to "did Texas deserve a Rose Bowl bid."

quote:

---

Remember last year when Tech and A&M tied for third but Tech ended up ranked?

---

we werent tied for 3rd. head to head is the first tiebreaker and we won.

carry on.

quote:

---

You see, USC, three out of five times, would probably beat Texas Tech

---

Delusion at it's finest....

Ah yes its that time again! Time for the Aggie Bias Cycle!

Preseason:

Rankings are bull**** because they are a bunch of biased Aggie lovers...except for any rankings that have tech ahead of A&M. THOSE rankings are the finest predictions of the future since Nostradamus himself! Even if they do predict Wyoming and Bowling Green in that same top 25 and A&M is not.

The season

A&M victories over tech shall not count under any of the following circumstances:
-Its in College Station
-Its in Overtime
-Its by less than 50 points
However any Tech victory in Lubbock or in overtime or by less than 7 points (which has NEVER happened in this series) shall be declared a monumental ass whipping of epic proportions! It shall be known as the most complete domination in the history of college football.

Post season:

Post season rankings are bull**** because they are all a bunch of biased Aggie lovers! How dare they rank A&M ahead of mighty Tech!!?? Havent they read the rules??? The A&M win was in OVERTIME so it doesnt count!!! Ok even so we won our bowl! What do you mean bowl wins dont count towards regular season ranking?? Bunch of Aggie lovers! We beat a team who DOMINATED the mighty PAC 10, look at their quality wins this season: ASU UCLA. And they DID manage to finally beat Southern Miss halfay through the 4th quarter! Its all biased A&M bull**** !!!!!

Repeat ad endless nauseam


"What's this garbage? Melon rinds, pantyhose, a term paper from Texas Tech!" -Mayor Quimby, The Simpsons

aglax=genius

quote:

---

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You see, USC, three out of five times, would probably beat Texas Tech
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Delusion at it's finest....

---

Referring to him as delusional is being very kind.

For Raider fans -- Cal was a dispirited team after beating a good Southern Miss team and losing out on a BCS bowl. The Aggies were the same in 1975 -- #2 in the nation before losing to Arkansas in a rescheduled game. The Ags then played an OK Southern Cal in the old Bluebonnet Bowl and got hammered by the Trojans by two touchdowns or more.

Listen up Ags...don't even try to explain to a tard anything that relates to math, logic, english, history, geography, or tobacco....

Tards are on their own plane, and the closest you can get to reaching them is taking a ride in the sip time machine.

Carry on.

quote:

---

A&M squeaked by Tech in overtime, we killed the #4 team in the nation

---

quote:

---

Since Tech beat the #4 team, we should have finished ranked #3

---

quote:

---

That is why the game is played on the field

---

So using your logic, since A&M beat tceh, and tceh beat the #4 team in the nation, A&M should be ranked one spot ahead of tceh because as you said the game is played on the field...

Carry on

well, sh^t, I love how tceh can justify their loss against us because it was in overtime, and they conveniently fail to mention that Cal was missing their TOP 5 RECEIVERS! JJ Arington was freaking awesome, as was Aaron Rogers, but it doesn't work when you don't have all of the weapons that got you there. Sad really, buncha sand-lovin retards.