Texan1976 said:
Nobody is disputing that Bama has been great under Saban, or that Florida was great under Meyer - or even that Auburn was great for one year when they bought the best player in the sport.
What is ****ing asinine is the common refrain by talking heads and idiot fans that implies that "SEC football" is an entirely different and superior) sport than what everyone else plays. You hear it all the time - "SEC speed," "SEC defenses," blah blah blah.
It's not that Alabama is overrated - it's that Vandy and Kentucky and Tennessee and South Carolina and Miss and MSU and A&M, and to a lesser extent Auburn and Georgia, are overrated because they play in the SEC. Most teams in that conference are wildly overrated. That's why it's annoying.
That and the fact that on-field results never seem to have any effect on this SEC dogma - Georgia lost to Texas because they were disinterested, not because their archaic offense was completely suffocated by better coaching when matched against similar athletes; Missouri, a perennial B12 also-ran wins the SEC East twice in its first 3 years in that conference; A&M's best years in the SEC were their first 2 - after defecting from the B12 (where they weren't particularly good); etc.
So how do you explain why the NFL drafts significantly more SEC players(from ALL the teams)than any other conference? Have they bought into this who SEC over rated thing?
Did you actually get a degree from tu? If so, I assume cognitive reasoning was not included.
Edited to add that the SEC,SEC,Sec had 53 players drafted
Sip conference 20
According to this sip genius, we have completely fooled the NFL. Man, we are good.
Oh and Omeire in a new interview said he flipped to the sips because he looked at the depth charts and thought he had a better chance to start. Truth that.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full
Medical Disclaimer.