Found Randolph Duke

13,260 Views | 59 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by Credible Source
Mikeyshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The Aggie obsession has not slowed down this offseason.
Mikeyshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BVAg85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well if a&m is so irrelevant to sips why have they been obsessed with us the last few years? I wonder what happened to trigger them.
tamc91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If A&M is so irrelevant then why does he spend so much of his time and energy concocting incredibly intricate falsehoods about us? Why wouldn't he focus that energy on their true rival? He and other sips are obsessed because they know we are the bigger long term threat to their attempts to manipulate their way into the power role in the region.

They never want to compete on a level playing field, so now he resorts to lies.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The two schools have different back stories. They've got most of the football victories. We've got 8 MOH recipients.

How many Cotton Bowl trips would anyone trade for one Eli L. Whiteley?
GiveEmHellBill
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Seriously, it's getting a little creepy and sad......
Bottlehead90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is no longer funny.
It is concerning.
That guy needs help!
Aggie87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One thing idiots like Duke like to gloss over is that A&M was an all-male segregated military school until the 60's.

Because of that, we had a disadvantage recruiting football players, particularly if they weren't interested in being in an ROTC program like the Corps of Cadets. Women were allowed to be students in 1963. African Americans slowly began being admitted in 1963. Participation in the Corps became voluntary in 1965. It took a while to overcome those disadvantages to football recruiting.

So if you start at a point in time where all things eventually became relatively equal, recruiting wise, between A&M and tu, like 1975, you get a much more accurate portrayal of the real rivalry that existed.

A&M and tu played 37 times between 1975 and 2011. A&M has won 19 of those games, and tu has won 18 of them.

That's the rivalry, the one that Randolph Duke tries to ignore and bury.

It was one-sided prior to that for reasons that had more to do with off-field issues, generally.
Loyalty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BVAg85 said:

Well if a&m is so irrelevant to sips why have they been obsessed with us the last few years? I wonder what happened to trigger them.
Truth is they have lost that superior feeling. They know they are the 3rd or 4th most "significant" program in the state and it eats up their insecure minds. Fear is an amazing thing. They know things will never be the way they use to be.

If they really thought they were better than us they would ignore us.

Thats what we need to do Ags, ignore em. We have bigger fish to fry. LSU, Bama and the rest of the SEC.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lot younger than I pictured.
digging tunnels
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That is not him in the profile pic at all. He like 45ish
Raid05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm pretty sure the profile pic that he is using, is one of the guys that Fishers x-wife supposedly slept with.

That is how obsessed the guy is.
Raid05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haha, he is so obsessed he noticed this post in less than a few hours and had already responded to it.
Artimus Gordon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well put him back where you found him and wash your hands.

Randull should spend his time telling sip AD Del Monte and the Hermster to quit crying about it in the media. I swear every two or three weeks some sip starts whining about how much that game meant to the state. Sorry but that is what tech, Baylor and TCU are for.
They just can't understand that things have changed drastically in college football,especially with a&m the last 6 years. It's a different situation than what it was before. The a&m/tu game will never be the same so let it RIP. And quit trying to dig it up.
digging tunnels
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not agsessed at all. All his damn tweets are about A&M. We're irrelevant but so stuck in his head 24/7. Wonder how many OU posts he has, you know, their real rival
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is either the biggest troll or idiot.
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
His pathetic little ramblings have taken on a sad, resigned nature these days. Never again will it be the way he pretends it to be in what's left of his mind so now the cheap, baseless potshots. It's like throwing rocks at an Abrams tank. Sad but still funny.

Hi Charles!
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
His Michigan "friend" was questioning our obsession so randy had to take it to the next level to prove our obsession.
ClassOf17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
usmcbrooks said:

Lot younger than I pictured.



That's not him. Pretty creepy to use another dude's selfie as your profile pic
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Raid05 said:

I'm pretty sure the profile pic that he is using, is one of the guys that Fishers x-wife supposedly slept with.

That is how obsessed the guy is.

Yep, I just googled it. Good God, that guy needs some serious help.
Your Friend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fishers wife banged a kid?
pete85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your Friend said:

Fishers wife banged a kid?
Kind of like when your mom first met your dad.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your Friend said:

Fishers wife banged a kid?

What e-weight did you use on your e-line with that post, you obsessed f'ing weirdo?
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ClassOf17 said:

usmcbrooks said:

Lot younger than I pictured.



That's not him. Pretty creepy to use another dude's selfie as your profile pic
BohunkAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm more than happy to have guys like him represent the sips.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BohunkAg said:

I'm more than happy to have guys like him represent the sips.

Indeed
realestateguru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
digging tunnels said:

That is not him in the profile pic at all. He like 45ish
Except he is 56. And of course his little buddy







corybantic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Randolph and Ketch make a fine pair to represent tu.

Also throw in vINTS to represent their strong academic culture.
ignatiusreilly4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't feed the trolls.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He looks like Mr Bean with Downs.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
realestateguru said:

digging tunnels said:

That is not him in the profile pic at all. He like 45ish
Except he is 56. And of course his little buddy









Now that's a guy that looks like he's got a BADAZZ life that doesn't revolve around obsessing over Texas A&M 24/7.
Raid05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your Friend said:

Fishers wife banged a kid?


The dude was 27, not what I would call a kid.
88jrt06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nm
digging tunnels
How long do you want to ignore this user?
realestateguru said:

digging tunnels said:

That is not him in the profile pic at all. He like 45ish
Except he is 56. And of course his little buddy









Is the guy in the blue shirt also the same guy in the white shirt? If so, that is not him at all
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
digging tunnels said:

realestateguru said:

digging tunnels said:

That is not him in the profile pic at all. He like 45ish
Except he is 56. And of course his little buddy









Is the guy in the blue shirt also the same guy in the white shirt? If so, that is not him at all



Pics or it's not true.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.