Found Randolph Duke

13,286 Views | 59 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by Credible Source
Aggie87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Raid05 said:

Haha, he is so obsessed he noticed this post in less than a few hours and had already responded to it.

Even funnier is that he isn't able to actually respond to the point I made, because he has no argument that holds up - from 75 on, they have no advantage in the rivalry. That is factually true and the W/L record supports it. Because the playing field for recruiting had equalized by then.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie87 said:

Raid05 said:

Haha, he is so obsessed he noticed this post in less than a few hours and had already responded to it.

Even funnier is that he isn't able to actually respond to the point I made, because he has no argument that holds up - from 75 on, they have no advantage in the rivalry. That is factually true and the W/L record supports it. Because the playing field for recruiting had equalized by then.
Yeah, but ****!
goodAg80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
realestateguru said:

digging tunnels said:

That is not him in the profile pic at all. He like 45ish
Except he is 56. And of course his little buddy

Pregnant and no chin isn't a great look.







realestateguru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Top pic is Charles M Satterfield (randolphduke) and the second is Jay Spears of Silsbee (Longhornfrenzy)
digging tunnels
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok that first pic does look like him from the side
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are other photos of that idiot?

If so post them.
BESCo91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
realestateguru said:

Top pic is Charles M Satterfield (randolphduke) and the second is Jay Spears of Silsbee (Longhornfrenzy)
https://goo.gl/images/Df9Jgg
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie87 said:

Raid05 said:

Haha, he is so obsessed he noticed this post in less than a few hours and had already responded to it.

Even funnier is that he isn't able to actually respond to the point I made, because he has no argument that holds up - from 75 on, they have no advantage in the rivalry. That is factually true and the W/L record supports it. Because the playing field for recruiting had equalized by then.


And he won't

Even if you ignore everything else and just looked at school sizes, during the height of that dominance he likes to cling to, it was the equivalent of modern A&M playing Sam Houston state.

I mean we have a dominant record over Sam but do we really brag about it when they've never had the size or resources to compete with us?
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wouldn't say tu didn't have an advantage in the rivalry. They certainly did and in many ways still do. The BOMC still exists, as well as biased rankings, and not to mention what they had planned to do with the LHN.

Better to say that the W/L records demonstrates how they no longer get the results on the field they used to despite the remaining advantages. We have been able to compensate with our exodus to the promised land.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When was it that unlimited scholarships were done away with? That would seem to be the natural beginning of any "modern era" of college ball.

Update:

Quote:

1973 brought about the first limitations on football scholarships in order to free up money for women's sports after Title IX was passed by Congress in 1972 as part of the Equal Opportunity in Education Act. This caused the NCAA schools' presidents and athletic directors to push through a limit of 105 football scholarships. Additional reductions were made in 1978 (95) and again in 1992 which brought the limit to its present number of 85 and 63 for Division I-AA.

So what is the record from 1973 or 74 (depending on how fast it was implemented)? And did schools have to shed people already given scholarships right away or were they grandfathered in and phased out as they graduated?
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Question Answered: Since scholarship limits were imposed in 1973*, the record over the 39 meetings is Texas 20, A&M 19.

*This assumes the new scholarship limit was fully in place for the 1973 season. If it took more than one year to phase in we are at least tied.


Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TexasTexas_A%26M_football_rivalry
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:

There are other photos of that idiot?

If so post them.


Damn, dude. How about y'all don't.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
His side profile makes him look like a much fatter, much less successful Deloss Dodds.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jblaschke said:

bobbranco said:

There are other photos of that idiot?

If so post them.


Damn, dude. How about y'all don't.


Damn, dude, how bout you get a sense of humor.
marble rye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Squadron7 said:

Question Answered: Since scholarship limits were imposed in 1973*, the record over the 39 meetings is Texas 20, A&M 19.

*This assumes the new scholarship limit was fully in place for the 1973 season. If it took more than one year to phase in we are at least tied.


Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TexasTexas_A%26M_football_rivalry


He's already tweeted a rebuttal to this.

Good Lord.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of course he has

Because you don't count the rivalry when it was on a somewhat even basis

You count it when you were 3 times bigger and wealthier than the small all make military academy

Because of course
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of course, he ignored the fact that the sips proceeded in immediately breaking the rule and getting put on probation.
https://books.google.com/books?id=YNIDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA24&lpg=PA24&dq=1961+southwestern+conference+scholarship+limitations&source=bl&ots=UCzoNmXIns&sig=1Pwzu5lWMoQoj2m6CD0N7zTJnk8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj-9PGK7ZHbAhUD_IMKHSASCQ04ChDoATABegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=1961%20southwestern%20conference%20scholarship%20limitations&f=false
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Question for anyone that follows Randolph and his...um...healthy interest in us.....has he ever spent time "de-bunking" the book "Meat on the Hoof"?

bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
digging tunnels? Is this the Satterfield you know?

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/3898547/?#sp=show-clips
digging tunnels
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yup! That's him!!!
class12of
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well this is an interesting development to stumble upon...





bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
digging tunnels said:

Yup! That's him!!!


I hear he is sleeping on his sisters couch. Is that true?
p_bubel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No matter his living conditions, his success in the real world or whether or not his ex is getting drilled on the regular by an Aggie, the guy is 100% a ****ing loser by any measure.
McInnis80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So basically he is living in a van down by the river?
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
McInnis80 said:

So basically he is living in a van down by the river?


That would be her 'stabbin cabin'?!!!

Poor Charles Mllford Satterfield the Turd.
Credible Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are you the guy that knows him in real life? I read somewhere on here that Satterfield ain't him, and the guys real name is Dan. I called him Dan on Twitter once and he STFU real fast.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.