Keep at it, boys
Randolph Duke
778,772 Views |
3764 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by goodAg80
quote:
Good Lord you're whiny. Former Ag living in Austin... **** we may have finally found Randolph Duke's TexAgs account.
Ouch that hurts...but if there is anyone on all of GBH with the intellect of the sip's own rainman it would be you my little friend...
Both of y'all STFU please
quote:
Keep at it, boys
You're right.
Yeah I'm hammered, that's my bad. Apologies to the board.
quote:
Yeah I'm hammered, that's my bad. Apologies to the board.
Don't apologize, just show us the video that you two made.
Fair enough
Don't make me get the diaper out!
So Charles promises the trademark is of such egregious nature that it WILL go to the Texas attorney general....haha!
quote:
I have heard of few legal controversies where at least one of the strongly held opinions held by the legal professionals did not prevail when everything was said and done, regardless of how 100% positive the lawyer was when he initially formed his opinion.
I deeply respect the caliber of legal reasoning that is so often found on this board, including in this thread. However, I think it is a bit premature to state unequivocally that the information that is about to go public stands no chance of warranting a review by the Attorney General when the information hasn't even been seen. I understand some people have the amazing ability to form an opinion without having the facts, but I am going to be so bold to say that in this instance, facts might prove somewhat helpful.
"No harm, no foul" only works when no one has been harmed. The trademark scam the ****s have been perpetrating, and profiting from, wasn't meaningless to Chuckie Sonntag when the university threatened to ruin his already meager life. I would dare to say it hasn't been meaningless to any of the people the school's attorneys have bullied with their knowingly false claims over the past three decades.
The only opinion that matters in determining whether the **** trademark scam is actionable is that of the AG and I promise you, one way or another, this scam will come before the AG. High ranking state employees, highly questionable behavior, millions of dollars involved and the unquestioned understanding the behavior will continue until and unless someone steps in to halt it, all justify a review by the AG.
Charles once again displays his complete lack of any understanding of how copy right law works or the legal definition of fraud!
Isn't trademark law under federal jurisdiction? Why would the Texas AGs office even care?
My cigar is drying out, so to speak, should I put it back in the humidor?
quote:Yes. Trademark is Federal. The state AG won't have anything to do with it whatsoever. Anyone saying otherwise has no clue what they are talking about. Even if A&M knowingly and fraudulently acquired trademarks, the Texas AG still wouldn't do anything other than follow the case in the news when it goes to Federal court.
Isn't trademark law under federal jurisdiction? Why would the Texas AGs office even care?
Top people in the AG Office are working on this, I tell you. High-up, top, top people!
This couldn't get any better. The more he talks, the more he fails, and the more we get to laugh. Keep up the work Dan!
To be fair to Duke, not that he deserves it, I think he is saying that the actions taken by state employees to protect a trademark he deems fraudulent oversteps their state constitutional priveledges. He is hoping for punishment of some administrators, not the trademark itself since he is starting to accept that that won't happen on the basis that currently exists. I have no idea if he is correct about that assuming it were fraudulent.
This could be his ace in the hole since that would potentially legitimize the premise that the mark is fraudulent. The problem is, fraud would need to be determined by its legal elements first before the Texas AG could act. Not simply because he keeps referring to the mark as fraudulent.
He is fundamentally begging the question.
This could be his ace in the hole since that would potentially legitimize the premise that the mark is fraudulent. The problem is, fraud would need to be determined by its legal elements first before the Texas AG could act. Not simply because he keeps referring to the mark as fraudulent.
He is fundamentally begging the question.
quote:
To be fair to Duke
To be even more fair, he's a f'ing lunatic.
quote:He is fundamentally begging for a ray of sunshine in his otherwise meagre life. Unfortunately he won't get one. Because he is the Washington Generals of internet message board smack. Its his fate to lose 2 to 3 times a week for eternity to the globetrotting Fighting Texas Aggies!
He is fundamentally begging the question.
1) Just protecting a trademark in of itself is not and never can be fraud. To be fraud, you have to knowingly have filed for a trademark using misrepresented facts.
2) Unfortunately for Dukey Dumbass, his quest for quibbling details does not constitute proof that our trademark was obtained fraudulently no matter what Duke thinks simply because we have enough historical evidence that shows E. King Gill did in fact come down from the stands and suit up for A&M, ready to play if needed. And that's all we need. None of the other details matter no matter how much Randy wants them to. Nor does it matter exactly when the 12th man tradition coalesced after Gill. All that matters is A&M can show a clear history of use since the 20s/30s and most importantly was the first to file for the trademark.
2) Unfortunately for Dukey Dumbass, his quest for quibbling details does not constitute proof that our trademark was obtained fraudulently no matter what Duke thinks simply because we have enough historical evidence that shows E. King Gill did in fact come down from the stands and suit up for A&M, ready to play if needed. And that's all we need. None of the other details matter no matter how much Randy wants them to. Nor does it matter exactly when the 12th man tradition coalesced after Gill. All that matters is A&M can show a clear history of use since the 20s/30s and most importantly was the first to file for the trademark.
Duke crying about aggies.
It's like he doesn't realize that every time we sue someone, our legal right to the trademark gets examined, and confirmed. There is no fraud. He clearly doesn't know what fraud is to begin with, and literally nobody will do anything about it, ever. Much less the *******ed AG of Texas.
quote:Imbecile, n, Psychology. (no longer in technical use; now considered offensive) a person of the second order in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, above the level of idiocy, having a mental age of seven or eight years and an intelligence quotient of 25 to 50.quote:quote:
That's true. We'll always make fun of people doing stupid things. Pretty much the same thing I do each time you post.
Says the dumbace who fashions himself an expert on the 12thman trademarks but keeps losing his argument with an embecile.
Embecile. Strong finish there.
While I'm at it:
Idiot, n, Psychology. (no longer in technical use; considered offensive) a person of the lowest order in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.
Moron, n, Psychology. (no longer in technical use; now considered offensive) a person of borderline intelligence in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having an intelligence quotient of 50 to 69.
Idiot, n, Psychology. (no longer in technical use; considered offensive) a person of the lowest order in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.
Moron, n, Psychology. (no longer in technical use; now considered offensive) a person of borderline intelligence in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having an intelligence quotient of 50 to 69.
This history lesson shows that normal, functional people have been trying to figure out ways to describe the likes of Randolph for a long time
quote:Super top! Uber top! The toppiest, toppingest toppers of all, the tippy tip of the tippy tip top toppers, no one tips their top and no one tops their tip!
Top people in the AG Office are working on this, I tell you. High-up, top, top people!
quote:So.....the state attorney general is getting ready to charge himself with Fraud because Duke said so?????quote:Super top! Uber top! The toppiest, toppingest toppers of all, the tippy tip of the tippy tip top toppers, no one tips their top and no one tops their tip!
Top people in the AG Office are working on this, I tell you. High-up, top, top people!
Sadly, he may really believe this......
What's funny to me about this whole thing is that Duke has proven to everybody that he has exhibited the attributes of a cult leader as opposed to proving that we area cult.
1.) Obsession
2.) Over promising and under delivering
3.) Speaking with confidence that a very specific day is going to have large significance and then having to change that day multiple times or change the significance of the date.
4.) Surrounding himself with like minded people
5.) Over inflated sense of self worth
1.) Obsession
2.) Over promising and under delivering
3.) Speaking with confidence that a very specific day is going to have large significance and then having to change that day multiple times or change the significance of the date.
4.) Surrounding himself with like minded people
5.) Over inflated sense of self worth
End Of Message
Joined:
Jan 10, 2014
Posts:
15,437
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:Token, if it bothers you so much to read this thread, then quit reading the damned thing. Quit being a whiny little b/tch about it and move on.....
bunch of mothafucking silky johnson's in here
quote:I had no idea these terms were ranked by IQ.
While I'm at it:
Idiot, n, Psychology. (no longer in technical use; considered offensive) a person of the lowest order in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.
Moron, n, Psychology. (no longer in technical use; now considered offensive) a person of borderline intelligence in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having an intelligence quotient of 50 to 69.
So it's:
Idiot - 0-24.9
Imbecile - 25-49.9
Moron - 50-68.9
Nice - 69
quote:They're working in shifts.
Top people in the AG Office are working on this, I tell you. High-up, top, top people!
quote:
5.) Over inflated sense of self worth
A Horn with an over inflated sense of self worth? Never!
quote:LOL.quote:I had no idea these terms were ranked by IQ.
While I'm at it:
Idiot, n, Psychology. (no longer in technical use; considered offensive) a person of the lowest order in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.
Moron, n, Psychology. (no longer in technical use; now considered offensive) a person of borderline intelligence in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having an intelligence quotient of 50 to 69.
So it's:
Idiot - 0-24.9
Imbecile - 25-49.9
Moron - 50-68.9
Nice - 69
I remember from psych class that there used to be legitimate definitions for these terms, but not what the ranges were.
Yeah, people started using them as insults, so these words lost a lot of credibility as good scientific descriptions. I think we might be moving that way with the word "r-e-t-a-r-d-e-d" as well. We still use the classification of "MR," or Mentally ********," but I have a feeling it'll be replaced soon with something more clinical sounding, like "learning challenged," or some such.
quote:I could see this happening. The AG is a Baylol grad, after all.quote:So.....the state attorney general is getting ready to charge himself with Fraud because Duke said so?????quote:Super top! Uber top! The toppiest, toppingest toppers of all, the tippy tip of the tippy tip top toppers, no one tips their top and no one tops their tip!
Top people in the AG Office are working on this, I tell you. High-up, top, top people!
Sadly, he may really believe this......
Featured Stories
See All
Arranging the horse-cart combo correctly is critical for Texas A&M
by Olin Buchanan
17:35
21h ago
3.0k
Head coach Buzz Williams reviews A&M's execution vs. Ohio State
by Billy Liucci
Presenting Texas Aggies United’s Battle For Atlanta Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United