Randolph Duke

777,504 Views | 3764 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by goodAg80
Actual Talking Thermos
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DifferenceMaker Ag • 9:53a, 2/17/16
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
I'm not an expert on the rules of etiquette but I feel like a pretty good rule of thumb is "do not bring a thousand-dollar sex mannequin to Wal-Mart and drive around on a motorized scooter posing for photos with children."


Care to elaborate on how you know what one of those things costs?
I knew they were very expensive but I didn't want to google it at work so I guessed. Turns out I was way off. Just googled on my phone and it turns out that one of those things costs more like $6,500.
You can get them at Walmart for $4750.

It just struck me: that dude's creepy giant sex Barbie could very well be the most expensive thing he owns
Reply Quote
7
Biz Ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TelcoAg • 10:15a, 2/17/16
AG
quote:
At this point, Randolph Duke is our own personal Scooby Doo villain, and the real world keeps ripping that mask off at the end of every episode.
And he'd have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for those meddling Aggies!
Reply Quote
5
TelcoAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Biz Ag • 10:21a, 2/17/16
AG
I was thinking more along the lines of:

"And I would have gotten away with it, if it wasn't for everyone of importance not giving a ****!"
Reply Quote
5
millertyme
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TelcoAg • 10:32a, 2/17/16
AG
I wonder how it feels to invest so much of your time and energy into something you feel is great, only to send it to your target audience and have them say, "Not this f'in guy again!" while deleting your masterpiece.
Reply Quote
8
Diet Cokehead
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:14a, 2/17/16
AG
Seriously, he is dedicating his life to putting together this masterpiece and not one single person takes it seriously or gives a shat about it.
Reply Quote
10
Al Bula
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:27a, 2/17/16
AG
So Chip Brown is working up a serious pwnage story about Texas A&M perpetuating what he and Randy call an Aggie myth and it will be full of lurid details of Aggies strong-arming three NFL teams and judicial parties? Those guys are drunk off eating each other's jizz. Good Lord.
Reply Quote
3
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Al Bula • 11:43a, 2/17/16
AG
quote:
So Chip Brown is working up a serious pwnage story about Texas A&M perpetuating what he and Randy call an Aggie myth and it will be full of lurid details of Aggies strong-arming three NFL teams and judicial parties? Those guys are drunk off eating each other's jizz. Good Lord.
Meh, considering Chip's dust up with Chancellor Sharp, he might see this as another salvo lobbed at Sharp.

And he may very well be that stupid to run with "our esteemed colleague's" compendious research. If he does, he'll lose whatever credibility he has left.
Reply Quote
2
Hood
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Al Bula • 11:52a, 2/17/16
AG
Chip Brown's article that brought about the rebuke from Sharp was done BEFORE any FOIA or other research was done. Chip admitted as much in his defensive tweets after.

So I would fully expect Chip to use Dan Satterfield's "work" without doing his own in a heartbeat.

And the certain beat down that will follow will be glorious.
Reply Quote
Aggie Joe 93
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:56a, 2/17/16
AG
How would you say "come at me bro" in 1922 era slang?
Reply Quote
3
TelcoAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie Joe 93 • 12:03p, 2/17/16
AG
Let's take a ride, lollygagger!
Reply Quote
14
ClassOf17
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TelcoAg • 12:16p, 2/17/16
quote:
I was thinking more along the lines of:

"And I would have gotten away with it, if it wasn't for everyone of importance not giving a ****!"


Yeah but even they did the facts shoot down any of his argument before they even start.
Reply Quote
TelcoAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ClassOf17 • 12:46p, 2/17/16
AG
I'm not gonna rehash this convo here, because it's too damn involved, but the facts available don't confirm all of his positions, nor do they invalidate all of them.

In regards to A&M's claim that first use occurred in 1922, hes correct. First use didn't happen until much later, although that alone doesn't invalidate the trademark.

In regards to his claims that the E. King Gill story is fabricated - that there were more players available to play - there isn't enough evidence available to prove it. There's just a bunch of conflicting pieces of information, and he cherry picked the articles that support him.

And the main takeaway from this entire ordeal is: No one ****ing cares
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
goodAg80
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TelcoAg • 12:49p, 2/17/16
AG
quote:
I'm not gonna rehash this convo here, because it's too damn involved, but the facts available don't confirm all of his positions, nor do they invalidate all of them.

In regards to A&M's claim that first use occurred in 1922, hes correct. First use didn't happen until much later, although that alone doesn't invalidate the trademark.

In regards to his claims that the E. King Gill story is fabricated - that there were more players available to play - there isn't enough evidence available to prove it. There's just a bunch of conflicting pieces of information, and he cherry picked the articles that support him.

And the main takeaway from this entire ordeal is: No one ****ing cares
So in your look at it, when is the earliest first use evidence?
Reply Quote
Rocco S
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:57p, 2/17/16
I think I may have a theory on why he's so hung up on the 12th Man deal.

The Aggie that was ****ing his wife gave Charles's son a 12th Man jersey which is what led to Charles's own flesh and blood becoming a Texas Aggie fan.

I can't imagine the pain and torture that causes him. Is he even sure it's his son, and not the Aggie's? That must really cause him some long sleepless nights.

How awful.

I feel bad for him.








Just ****ing kidding. It makes me warm and fuzzy inside.
Reply Quote
1
SteveBott
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:58p, 2/17/16
AG
I posted this link about page 7. In it you will find an undated interview with coach D. X. Bible himself confirming the exact story of Dr Gill coming down from the stands.

http://texags.com/s/13116/the-original-12th-man-the-life-and-character-of-e-king-gill

But as said here it really just entertainment
Reply Quote
The Agly Duckling
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie304 • 1:57p, 2/17/16
quote:
Holy cow, he's stocking the lawyer
FIFY
Reply Quote
p_bubel
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to goodAg80 • 2:38p, 2/17/16
quote:
quote:
I'm not gonna rehash this convo here, because it's too damn involved, but the facts available don't confirm all of his positions, nor do they invalidate all of them.

In regards to A&M's claim that first use occurred in 1922, hes correct. First use didn't happen until much later, although that alone doesn't invalidate the trademark.

In regards to his claims that the E. King Gill story is fabricated - that there were more players available to play - there isn't enough evidence available to prove it. There's just a bunch of conflicting pieces of information, and he cherry picked the articles that support him.

And the main takeaway from this entire ordeal is: No one ****ing cares
So in your look at it, when is the earliest first use evidence?
1924.
Reply Quote
Hood
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:48p, 2/17/16
AG

Reply Quote
13
TelcoAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:55p, 2/17/16
AG
Settled http://bit.ly/1ROybaa
Reply Quote
6
Wildmen03
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:01p, 2/17/16
AG
Countdown to Duke's 12ga cranial aeration.
Reply Quote
17
Diet Cokehead
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Wildmen03 • 5:04p, 2/17/16
AG
quote:
Countdown to Duke's 12ga cranial aeration.
That would be such a waste of good lead and gun powder.
Reply Quote
8
TelcoAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to goodAg80 • 5:04p, 2/17/16
AG
quote:
quote:
I'm not gonna rehash this convo here, because it's too damn involved, but the facts available don't confirm all of his positions, nor do they invalidate all of them.

In regards to A&M's claim that first use occurred in 1922, hes correct. First use didn't happen until much later, although that alone doesn't invalidate the trademark.

In regards to his claims that the E. King Gill story is fabricated - that there were more players available to play - there isn't enough evidence available to prove it. There's just a bunch of conflicting pieces of information, and he cherry picked the articles that support him.

And the main takeaway from this entire ordeal is: No one ****ing cares
So in your look at it, when is the earliest first use evidence?


I haven't seen anything before E.E. mcQuillen's broadcast in 1939
Reply Quote
PetroAg87
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:09p, 2/17/16
AG
Case is settled.

http://www.theeagle.com/news/a_m/texas-a-m-colts-reach-settlement-over-use-of-th/article_28c71228-d5c8-11e5-82d3-7b08801b2cc2.html

So now let's see if Randolph goes through with all of the threats that he promised he would do.... Of course we all know he won't. This guy is all talk and zero action.
Reply Quote
11
2 edits
TelcoAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:14p, 2/17/16
AG
What's can he do? Hell, even his long-winded article on HornSports had to be taken down because of the erroneous info.
Reply Quote
4
p_bubel
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:16p, 2/17/16
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
p_bubel
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TelcoAg • 5:20p, 2/17/16
quote:

I haven't seen anything before E.E. mcQuillen's broadcast in 1939
Are you saying '39 for the first time the 12th man name being used at A&M or that's the earliest you've seen the 12th man tradition being associated with Gill?
Reply Quote
TelcoAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to p_bubel • 5:25p, 2/17/16
AG
Not gonna rehash here. Ask Randy
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Frankie T
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:27p, 2/17/16
Someone post a link to one of the threads where we had newspaper articles and such referencing us as the 12th man. I should have bookmarked them.
Reply Quote
2
ClassOf17
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TelcoAg • 5:41p, 2/17/16
quote:
I'm not gonna rehash this convo here, because it's too damn involved, but the facts available don't confirm all of his positions, nor do they invalidate all of them.

In regards to A&M's claim that first use occurred in 1922, hes correct. First use didn't happen until much later, although that alone doesn't invalidate the trademark.

In regards to his claims that the E. King Gill story is fabricated - that there were more players available to play - there isn't enough evidence available to prove it. There's just a bunch of conflicting pieces of information, and he cherry picked the articles that support him.

And the main takeaway from this entire ordeal is: No one ****ing cares


Dude I agree with you. All I was saying is that even if people did care about this, he has no evidence whatsoever. People would act as we do, read about three sentences in and fall asleep.
Reply Quote
bobbranco
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TelcoAg • 5:50p, 2/17/16
AG
quote:
1930
Aggie Band Spells 12th Man

As the spirit of the 12th Man is embraced by the Texas A&M student body, references to the tradition begin appearing around campus, including this formation by the Fightin' Texas Aggie Band.


http://12thman.tamu.edu/

I contend the phrase had been used by A&M since 1922 or before. The evidence is out there. There was a newspaper clipping from 1921 that mentions A&M and the twelfth man.

Reply Quote
8
p_bubel
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TelcoAg • 6:24p, 2/17/16
quote:
Not gonna rehash here. Ask Randy


FYI, The Battalion 1924
Reply Quote
8
bmiller
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:37p, 2/17/16
AG
An older article. But wanted to post anyway.

http://ipjournal.law.wfu.edu/2015/11/who-has-the-real-12th-man/
Reply Quote
Jack Squat 83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bmiller • 8:16p, 2/17/16
AG
quote:
An older article. But wanted to post anyway.

http://ipjournal.law.wfu.edu/2015/11/who-has-the-real-12th-man/
Bet Randy was MAD AS HELL when he couldn't comment on that article. Probably fired off a letter or two to the editor though.
Reply Quote
TelcoAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to p_bubel • 8:32p, 2/17/16
AG
I vaguely remeber this, but I think I always go back to 1939 due to the trademark being filed with a first use date of 1922, thus tying it directly to Gill.

If you ever feel like getting really deep into this, go explore different articles about the '22 Dixie Classic and try to figure out who travelled to the game,bwhich players were injured and which quarter they were injured in. It's nuts how much disparity there was in sports reporting between papers back then. (Also, if anyone does dive into this rabbit hole, you need to keep in mind that players removed from the field during a quarter in 1922 were required to stay off the field until the following quarter.)
Reply Quote
45-70Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:35p, 2/17/16
AG
I'm reading the new book on ty Cobb and the author mentions that sports writer during this era basically lied and made things up to sell papers.
Reply Quote
First Page Last Page
Page 11 of 108 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.