quote:
Oooooh, big talk from someone who's probably never been in court before, and hides behind a desk and legal briefs---which is quite admirable and a necessary part of the legal field, I admit, but not anywhere near the same as fighting a case in court. I would suspect that you'd pray a case against RD or ANYONE would be settled and wouldn't end up in court so you wouldn't face being an 'Esq.' in the the most commonly accepted sense. I'm guessing you wouldn't be as successful as you assume you'd be---not a big surprise.
Honestly, I know there are all types that are necessary in the legal profession, and I appreciate the attorneys that specialize in legal issues that aren't necessarily fought in court---usually the 'A' students from law school. But when your machinations don't lead to resolving an issue, then it goes to court and you guys usually aren't prepared to be in court and need experienced trial attorneys. Don't give us this chest-thumping c*** like you'd take on anyone and send 'em packing, like you could do it all on your own. It probably would take more than your 'expertise', and most probably someone fighting your battle for you in court.
Get over yourself. It's great if you can do research, but can you present in court?
You're right. I have my own firm that focuses solely on TAX LITIGATION and I've never been in court and just do research.
What a dumbass.