i just got my check from TRS and i am thinking i wait until after the election to put check in my roll over account. Is this a good idea or does it even matter to wait?
Correct, depositing the rollover into your IRA allows you to at least earn some interest on the money until you get it invested. Oh, and trying to time the market is a fool's errand, you may get lucky but there is zero correlation to market returns and national election results.B$Weigem said:
You don't have to invest it all at once. Deposit, dollar cost average and stick to it. You will never time the market perfectly.
ATX Advisors said:Correct, depositing the rollover into your IRA allows you to at least earn some interest on the money until you get it invested. Oh, and trying to time the market is a fool's errand, you may get lucky but there is zero correlation to market returns and national election results.B$Weigem said:
You don't have to invest it all at once. Deposit, dollar cost average and stick to it. You will never time the market perfectly.
https://www.dimensional.com/us-en/insights/bulls-bears-and-ballots-when-looking-at-politics-and-markets-think-long-term
JMac03 said:
You pulled out your TRS? I've always seen that as my guaranteed $$ when I retire. Main reason I won't leave here, cause TRS is a known monthly payout.
Baby Billy said:
What the hell does the election have to do with your TRS?
Over the long term, elections have nothing to do with the stock market. The market moves based on interest rates and earnings over the long term.TAMUworkingAG said:
So election has nothing to do with stock market? the following is an analysis about China's financial situation:
"China's weighting in the MSCI EM Index rose from 24% in Aug to 30% now, and its continued outperformance may drive a self-reinforcing 'pain-trade' before the year-end," Bank of America analysts said in a note on Monday.
However, they said, the "'buy everything' stage will be over soon," with market momentum, fiscal support, earnings, the U.S. election and further policy settings all part of the outlook.Co
Monywolf said:Over the long term, elections have nothing to do with the stock market. The market moves based on interest rates and earnings over the long term.TAMUworkingAG said:
So election has nothing to do with stock market? the following is an analysis about China's financial situation:
"China's weighting in the MSCI EM Index rose from 24% in Aug to 30% now, and its continued outperformance may drive a self-reinforcing 'pain-trade' before the year-end," Bank of America analysts said in a note on Monday.
However, they said, the "'buy everything' stage will be over soon," with market momentum, fiscal support, earnings, the U.S. election and further policy settings all part of the outlook.Co
If this is the case ("any loss might be devastating"), you should have taken the lifetime payments option presented to you, as it avoids losses.TAMUworkingAG said:
I'm 68 years old and more interested in short term investment losses on this money. I have to start taking money out if it I think when I turn 71 I think, since it's not a lot of money, any loss might be devastating when it's mandatory to start taking money out if it. It's such a small amount I guess I really shouldn't worry about it so much
Then I would suggest that your risk of loss may not be devastating (since you have an "income floor" with the monthly payment), and invest the money for growth and income. Plenty of good lower-risk options for investors in your situation.TAMUworkingAG said:
I did take the lifetime pension, I get both. I get a lump sum and a monthly payment too . I should have said partial lump sum, my bad
TAMUworkingAG said:Baby Billy said:
What the hell does the election have to do with your TRS?
so if one side wins election it won't affect the stock market?
OldArmyCT said:
A couple thoughts. First when the first Gulf War kicked off the headlines were full of doom and gloom for the market. It took off. When Trump was trending to win the 2016 election as the night wore on predictions of a market meltdown were all over the financial headlines. It soared the next morning. I retired in 2018 and invested 100% in the market, all equity. I had to take RMD's the next year. I'm still 100% equity today, obviously a lot older, and my IRA's have almost doubled. I had friends who retired the same time as I did and bought CD's, every single one of them has less money today than when they retired.
I kind of like the market, and you know something, it has never gone down without coming back up.
You've retired during the biggest inflation in the Dow in history, it's understandable that you like it!Quote:
I kind of like the market, and you know something, it has never gone down without coming back up.
That's very true but I look it at differently. If over 5 years I'm up maybe 40% in the stock market and it takes a 10% hit I'm losing profit. If I was in a 3% CD (that was what was offered back in 2018) I'd still have less money than the stock account, especially after taking my RMD's.Apache said:You've retired during the biggest inflation in the Dow in history, it's understandable that you like it!Quote:
I kind of like the market, and you know something, it has never gone down without coming back up.
The market can however go down & stay there for a decade, as it did in the 2000's.
I think we all have hit lightning in a bottle the past 10-15 years and we shouldn't pat ourselves on the back too much. Demographic collapse in the west & east Asia, Europe & The US being flooded with 3rd world grifters, continuing war in the ME.... something tells me we are due for a correction in the near future.
Not a bad thing to be cautious with your money during retirement at all. It's not like you have time to recover if things go bad in your late 70s.
JMO.
We are certainly in unique times with regard to the market.Quote:
5 years I'm up maybe 40% in the stock market
Apache said:We are certainly in unique times with regard to the market.Quote:
5 years I'm up maybe 40% in the stock market
I think their point is valid that it's not that abnormal. The S&P has gained 10.3% on average since its' inception in 1957. Even going back 150 years, the index equivalent has gained 9.3% on average. That makes a 40% cumulative return over 3 years not that outlandish.Apache said:
Has there ever been another run with such rapid gains over such an extended period of time?