torrid said:
TXTransplant said:
NSTN8 said:
Thank you so much! Basically speak to a lawyer that specializes in this stuff, it sounds like...?
You don't have to use an attorney. You can work with a patent agent, many of whom are just as qualified to do patent preparation and prosecution. Their hourly rate is just less. A good one should objectively evaluate your invention and give you a professional opinion on patentability before taking thousands or tens of thousands of dollars.
Also, depending on your invention, a design patent might suffice. These are a lot cheaper and easier to obtain than utility patents. But a design patent is exactly what it sounds like, and utility patents offer a lot more detail and protection.
A design patent covers the way something looks, like a Coca Cola bottle. It's more in line with a trademark and wouldn't cover an actual invention.
No, they are not in line with trademarks. A trademark is a brand name - a word, name, symbol, etc. used to identify and distinguish the goods/services of one seller from another. Trademarks aren't manufactured and sold like the invention covered by a design patent would be.
A design patent protects exactly what it says it protects - an ornamental design of an ARTICLE. An invention can be protected by both a utility and a design patent, or just a design patent.
The Nike swoosh symbol is a trademark. The unique design of their latest shoe would be covered by a design patent.
Design patents don't cover the function of an invention, but those those two characteristics (design and function) may not be separable. If an article with a specific functionality lacks a novel ornamental design, then it's not eligible for a design patent.
Based on the very little information given by the OP here, I mentioned it as something to ask a patent agent or attorney about.
I've been writing/prosecuting patents for 7 years and have been a registered patent agent for 5 years. I've never written a design patent. That's mostly because they are rare in my particular field of technical expertise, and utility patents do offer better protection. But the OP should be sure to ask about them, if the professional he speaks to doesn't mention it (and they may not, depending on their experience).
If the OP has an invention that functions because of its specific design, a design patent would prevent anyone else from making and selling an article with that specific design. The downside to that is, if the competitor can alter the design without altering the function, they would not be infringing the design patent. There would have to be a utility patent covering the Invention's function for there to be infringement.