GE said:I am have no opinion or information on this topic whatsoever, but 3% compared to what? Are we talking ALL advisor-managed portfolios vs. ALL that do it themselves on average, or is it more of an apples to apples comparison based on portfolio size?investorAg83 said:
Vanguard's study of the value an advisor adds concluded to 3% per year. Of that, asset allocation accounts for 0% and that's what all the DIY'ers put all their focus in. If that's the only reason you'd pay for help, there's no doubt they're better off.
The value comes from discussions about behavioral finance, asset location (read more as tax and risk management), spending strategies and to a much lesser degree, being able to do it cheaper than most investors on their own. The last bit is focused more on the fact that some investors find themselves in higher cost mutual funds, but it's still there. Asset allocation is no value add yet it's what most 'advisors' claim to help with the most.
'You got x% in your portfolio...I got x+2% over the same amount of time'. So tiring.
https://advisors.vanguard.com/iwe/pdf/ISGQVAA.pdf