Andy07 said:
Restricting people carrying on bags is nice for fixing the broken boarding process. Hopefully frequent flyers still get to carry on regardless of the fare booked.
I am sure they will sell you a $39 per carryon upgrade to allow that...
Andy07 said:
Restricting people carrying on bags is nice for fixing the broken boarding process. Hopefully frequent flyers still get to carry on regardless of the fare booked.
Andy07 said:
Restricting people carrying on bags is nice for fixing the broken boarding process. Hopefully frequent flyers still get to carry on regardless of the fare booked.
Can't possibly blue star this enough! The original mistake that has caused 90% of the issues people hate about flying now was starting to charge for bags instead of just adding a few bucks to each fare. TSA lines would be much faster without people trying to carry half their worldly goods through security, the overhead bin space would be available to those who need it, we wouldnt need to worry about when we got to our assigned seat, etc. All those problems become moot if people just checked their large bags and carried a small bag with their electronics and valuables on the plane.Pendragon12 said:Andy07 said:
Restricting people carrying on bags is nice for fixing the broken boarding process. Hopefully frequent flyers still get to carry on regardless of the fare booked.
It's a boarding process they broke by charging for bags in the first place.
I don't entirely agree. If my trip is 3 days or less, I'm not checking a bag. I'm carrying on a bag (or backpack) that fits in the oh bin.txags92 said:Can't possibly blue star this enough! The original mistake that has caused 90% of the issues people hate about flying now was starting to charge for bags instead of just adding a few bucks to each fare. TSA lines would be much faster without people trying to carry half their worldly goods through security, the overhead bin space would be available to those who need it, we wouldnt need to worry about when we got to our assigned seat, etc. All those problems become moot if people just checked their large bags and carried a small bag with their electronics and valuables on the plane.Pendragon12 said:Andy07 said:
Restricting people carrying on bags is nice for fixing the broken boarding process. Hopefully frequent flyers still get to carry on regardless of the fare booked.
It's a boarding process they broke by charging for bags in the first place.
Southwest is obviously free for check and carry on. Spirit and frontier charge for checking and also for carry on, so its sounds like a problem for the 'expensive' carriers. Maybe they could learn a thing or two from the budget companies.txags92 said:
Which is fine. When there are some folks checking bags, some folks not, you don't run out of overhead bin space and it doesn't slow down boarding too much. It is when you start charging $25+ per bag for check bags. Then, everybody who is able is going to stuff their things into a carryon to avoid checking anything, then you run out of OH bin space, everybody starts wanting to get on first to make sure there is space, or starts loading up OH bins with bags before getting to their seats, etc. then you have to start gate checking what doesn't fit, you have to start restricting who can carry what on, who gets to board earlier, etc. All the other problems flow from that first decision to charge for the check bags.
Quote:
Southwest is obviously free for check and carry on. Spirit and frontier charge for checking and also for carry on, so its sounds like a problem for the 'expensive' carriers. Maybe they could learn a thing or two from the budget companies.
Dude, you are completely misinformed on spirit and frontier. I never see '2am' flights. I don't even think they have any. (not counting delays of course.. different story)aeroag14 said:Quote:
Southwest is obviously free for check and carry on. Spirit and frontier charge for checking and also for carry on, so its sounds like a problem for the 'expensive' carriers. Maybe they could learn a thing or two from the budget companies.
One thing I find funny is the talk of the "expensive carriers".
Unless you are willing and able to fly at 2 am or 11:30 pm, the "expensive carriers" are generally cheaper than the economy airlines.
For one, Southwest hasn't been cheaper than the major airlines in years. Roughly the same price? Maybe, but certainly not cheaper across the board. I cant find a Southwest flight for cheaper than an AA flight 95% of the time. And when I do it is $5 cheaper and at that point is a crap shoot as to whether the time/arriving airport (Hobby vs bush, love vs DFW, etc) is better for me. Granted, you get free bags with southwest, but I also get free bags with my AA Citi card. Obviously that is dependent on where you fly from (and I generally do fly from an American Hub, PHX). But I just get pissed off every time I look at southwests site, because I go in with the mindset that it is an "economy airline" and it is always more expensive than the "expensive carriers"
As far as spirit, frontier, etc they are almost pointless to me. As someone who works for a living and cant fly at 2 am on a Thursday morning for a weekend trip, their cheap options are worthless to me. AT BEST their reasonably timed flights are in the same ball park as AA (within $10-15) and that doesn't include any of the 1000 crappy fees. At that point it becomes cheaper AND more comfortable to fly the big carriers. Every once in a while (like once or twice in the last year and a half) spirit happens to be a bit cheaper, but if we are talking about $25 cheaper after their fees, is it worth saving the few dollars to be less comfortable AND miss out on getting AA miles?
ok rant over.
Whenever I travel with my wife (i.e. non-work) we always check our bags (have free checked bags b/c of status and UAL card). That way, if we are not upgraded, we are always the last people to board the airplane. No standing in the "Group 2" line to jostle with Rick from St. Louis and 2 Packs A Day Mavis for bin space and then the thrill of sitting in a tiny seat for an extra 20 minutes.txags92 said:
Which is fine. When there are some folks checking bags, some folks not, you don't run out of overhead bin space and it doesn't slow down boarding too much. It is when you start charging $25+ per bag for check bags. Then, everybody who is able is going to stuff their things into a carryon to avoid checking anything, then you run out of OH bin space, everybody starts wanting to get on first to make sure there is space, or starts loading up OH bins with bags before getting to their seats, etc. then you have to start gate checking what doesn't fit, you have to start restricting who can carry what on, who gets to board earlier, etc. All the other problems flow from that first decision to charge for the check bags.
It is likely the routes (or days) you fly. I mean, no airline has cheap holiday/spring break flights. Often, Friday-Sunday trips are the most expensive regardless of airline, though Southwest has plenty of sales you can usually grab a good itinerary if you're flexible with dates.aeroag14 said:
You see I always think that going in, but it rarely plays out like that. I can stalk prices on google flights for weeks and usually never see truly "cheap flights" that are at reasonable times. Every once in a while? Sure, but generally no.
Perhaps it is the routes I usually fly. But I can go in right now and look during your jan-march time frame and I see ~1 week where the flights are cheaper than AA or united. And even then we are talking ~$50 cheaper. If you take into account even one checked or carried on bag each way you have it up to the same price as AA. And one of the Frontier/spirit times is at 5:55 in the morning, which is pretty unfeasible.
So I have one time (which isnt as good as the AA flights) I can reasonably fly the cheaper options. And even then its the same price as AA with fewer amenities. Again it could be the routes I fly and this usually is from an AA hub. But still
Based on the posts I've read, he sounds like a somewhat frequent business traveler in Houston with roughly equal access to both airports and limited flexibility on dates -- exactly like me.Pendragon12 said:
You are making really strong statements based on, likely, a very specific example. Southwest is no longer significantly cheaper than their competition, true, but they still often end up being cheaper for many fliers...especially if they need to check their bags. I won't speak on Spirit/Frontier since I never fly them.
blindey said:Based on the posts I've read, he sounds like a somewhat frequent business traveler in Houston with roughly equal access to both airports and limited flexibility on dates -- exactly like me..Pendragon12 said:
You are making really strong statements based on, likely, a very specific example. Southwest is no longer significantly cheaper than their competition, true, but they still often end up being cheaper for many fliers...especially if they need to check their bags. I won't speak on Spirit/Frontier since I never fly them.
tell them you're getting business select because you get more points and a free drink. There's your justification.txags92 said:
Alot of companies are going through systems such as concur that don't allow you to pick fares more than a certain amount over the lowest available fare. Others force you to justify why you are picking the higher fare.
Pay for the early bird checkin. It is just $10 per leg and will automatically check you in 24 hours in advance. I typically get a mid A or at worst a very low B number.Jock 07 said:
Oh yeah forgot to mention had to fly to DC for work a few weeks ago and had to fly SWA for the first time in probably 10 years. My main issue with the cattle call is the checkin process. I was in the middle of meetings all day in a classifed environment where I can't have my phone nor access to a computer. By the time I got out and was able to check in I got end of C group and no exit row or bulkhead seats. I realize you can upgrade by paying the extra 50 bucks or whatever it is.
it's $12.50. Just pay it if it's an issue.Jock 07 said:
I realize you can upgrade by paying the extra 50 bucks or whatever it is.
I was a dedicated AA guy for years. Hated the SW cattle call. Now though AA charges you for every little thing, the service sucks, and the FF miles have gotten almost useless if you want to go anywhere interesting no matter how far in advance you are booking.Jock 07 said:
Oh yeah forgot to mention had to fly to DC for work a few weeks ago and had to fly SWA for the first time in probably 10 years. My main issue with the cattle call is the checkin process. I was in the middle of meetings all day in a classifed environment where I can't have my phone nor access to a computer. By the time I got out and was able to check in I got end of C group and no exit row or bulkhead seats. I realize you can upgrade by paying the extra 50 bucks or whatever it is.
This is so true. I have just been stockpiling miles to take the family business class to Europe someday.blindey said:
United is headed in that direction (see this thread). What is interesting on United is that in terms of use of miles, I can either get garbage or really great flights with miles and nothing in between. By garbage I mean advance bookings that would cost under $200-250 anyways for the 25k award. By really great flights I mean RT transatlantic business class on a better Star Alliance partner for 100-120k.
no we wont if we have the mileage plus card I board with the first group everytime no matter how cheap my ticket isThe Lost said:txags92 said:
You realize that there is no practical way for the flight attendants to enforce that right? It will be just like the size restrictions on carryons. When was the last time you actually saw somebody told they can't bring on a carryon that was too big? The gate personnel just gate check them and don't require them to pay for checking it. And who is going ti stand on the plane checking boarding passes for each person putting a bag in the overhead bin?
This is just a sucker tax on people who play by the rules. And the folks that do stick to the rule will have a big honking bag stuffed under their seat and halfway into your leg space and will be all cramped up with their legs half I to your seat trying to fit around their bag. Not a winning move.
You've never flown spirit have you? They'll enforce it at the gate, and it'll be easy since they'll all be in the last boarding group, not mixed in.
flown-the-coop said:
Airlines are the biggest price fixing folks around. The idea that one is cheaper than another is a farce.
If two or more airlines fly from the same Point A to Point B, they will price their fare buckets the same. Now, you may see a price difference if Airline 1 sales through fare bucket 1 before Airline 2 sales through theirs, but revenue management will quickly catch up to this and close fare bucket 1 on Airline 2.
If airline is only one flying A to B, you will see those super high fares. Your alternative is to drive to another airport or connect.
Only other price differential is a result of service offerings. I fly Dallas to Houston every week. Southwest from DAL-HOU is almost always the exact same price as AA or United running DFW-IAH or DFW-HOU. This includes fare buckets at the advanced purchase rate, close in rate, fully refundible, etc. Only difference is that the mainlines may offer first class, which is typically priced about $30 each way above SWA's business select.
Absolutely gone are the days of airlines rewarding any sort of loyalty. Fly the airline that offers you the best choices or happens to be randomly cheaper for your needs. Given the current state of play, I think SWA is preferrable from the aspect that there are NO change fees and funds can be applied to another ticket. Probably saves me several thousand dollars a year. (e.g. if I fly Business Select on SWA, I can change all I want for nothing, which is great when commuting Dallas to Houston; if I buy a 1st class ticket on AA or United for just a few $$'s more, then the change fee is $150 and the new fare could be hundreds of dollars more - no dice).