Brian Cashman said that he had "many conversations" with the Astros about Kyle Tucker. "At the end of the day, I'm glad that Mr. Tucker is not in the American League. It's a big get for the Cubs."
— Bryan Hoch ⚾️ (@BryanHoch) December 13, 2024
Brian Cashman said that he had "many conversations" with the Astros about Kyle Tucker. "At the end of the day, I'm glad that Mr. Tucker is not in the American League. It's a big get for the Cubs."
— Bryan Hoch ⚾️ (@BryanHoch) December 13, 2024
— Gambling Tailor (@KingTailorGang) December 13, 2024
Brian Cashman was asked if Alex Bregman's history being on the 2017 Astros factors into the Yankees decision making:
— Yankees Videos (@snyyankees) December 13, 2024
"He's been a thorn in our side for years, along with other people's side. I have had a conversation or two with Scott Boras" pic.twitter.com/bAOAVGWdAO
Agree on Springer and Tucker, I'm lower on losing Correa, Correa had too many injuries, losing Beltran to the Mets was an 8 for me. Seeing Berkman put on uniforms for the Cardinals, Rangers, and Yankees hurt my heart - even though I totally understood him leaving.Wabs said:
On a scale of 1-10 hurting as an Astros fan (10 the worst):
Springer 10
Correa 8
Tucker 3
Quote:
What's next for Houston?
Rome: Acquiring Paredes solves one of Houston's corner infield vacancies but which one is a mystery. Paredes' primary position is third base, but last season, Houston had plans to play Paredes at first base while pursuing him at the trade deadline.
That club still had Alex Bregman at third base. Bregman remains a free agent and the Astros are still suitors for his services, but this trade may diminish the viability of a reunion.
Houston has checked in with the St. Louis Cardinals about a possible Nolan Arenado trade, multiple league sources said, but it's unclear whether Arenado would waive his no-trade clause to join the Astros.
That Houston has even expressed interest in Arenado and the $74 million he is owed suggests it is at least willing to spend substantial money. The club may have no choice given its many needs. Brown has indicated the team needs a leverage reliever and starting pitcher in addition to fixing its infield.
A left-handed hitting outfielder is needed now, too, with Tucker out of the fold.
Poot said:
Chopping balls off his shin and having the worst wall awareness I've ever seen.
One of the strangest, most awkward super stars I've ever seen.
He's probably going to get stuck in the ivy.
Wabs said:
On a scale of 1-10 hurting as an Astros fan (10 the worst):
Springer 10
Correa 8
Tucker 3
Wabs said:
On a scale of 1-10 hurting as an Astros fan (10 the worst):
Springer 10
Correa 8
Tucker 3
Hasn't Nolan already started to show some of the same falloff over the last year that Abreu did before he signed here?Ag_07 said:
Get STL to eat some of his remaining contract and insert him at 3B and slide Paredes to 1B.
I agree re: Correa. I always felt like he got a lot of credit for being the "heart of the team" when the team didn't seem to be all that different after he left. Pena playing lights out as a rookie probably helps with the hindsight, but I just don't remember feeling all that gutted when Correa left.Max Power said:Agree on Springer and Tucker, I'm lower on losing Correa, Correa had too many injuries, losing Beltran to the Mets was an 8 for me. Seeing Berkman put on uniforms for the Cardinals, Rangers, and Yankees hurt my heart - even though I totally understood him leaving.Wabs said:
On a scale of 1-10 hurting as an Astros fan (10 the worst):
Springer 10
Correa 8
Tucker 3
Overall I like the deal. Tucker is going to want too much money and I honestly don't have any interest in Houston signing guys to a deal that large for that period of time, it's crazy to me. I also don't want Bregman if it's going to cost $200MM. If you have a guy you can flip for good assets and keep the books in a good place you have to do it. He also didn't end up in the AL. This gives them flexibility to look at some other needs and I'd prefer they invest some more in pitching.
Ags #1 said:
Don't think there is any way you give JV a 2 year deal. He looked washed up last year
The one and only @Chandler_Rome joined @AdamJWexler & @AdamClanton to discuss the Kyle Tucker trade to the Cubs. #Astros
— SportsTalk 790 (@SportsTalk790) December 13, 2024
Catch the entire interview here: https://t.co/JU1mvyRIBs pic.twitter.com/rulPymqlH5
Here is a thought exercise. Name a 6+ year deal given to a 26+ year old player in MLB that still looks like a good deal in year 6. I can't think of any case where a guy was given a long blockbuster contract where the team isn't working in the last year or two of the deal to find a way to get rid of them with somebody else taking on some of the contract. As long as we keep making smart moves with prospects, I think Crane's approach is probably the right one as long as there are teams out there that are willing to spend $100MM more than the Astros. Winning bidding wars for those guys on 7+ year deals seems highly likely to be a pyrrhic victory to me.JCA1 said:
Thinking more long term, this suggests that Crane is a man of his word regarding longterm contracts and just does not have any interest in offering 8 or 10 year deals. Without saying whether that's the right decision or not, it is at odds with the fair market value for all-stars in their 20s. So, to the extent we develop any future all-stars, are we destined to see them get traded as they approach free agency?
txags92 said:Here is a thought exercise. Name a 6+ year deal given to a 26+ year old player in MLB that still looks like a good deal in year 6. I can't think of any case where a guy was given a long blockbuster contract where the team isn't working in the last year or two of the deal to find a way to get rid of them with somebody else taking on some of the contract. As long as we keep making smart moves with prospects, I think Crane's approach is probably the right one as long as there are teams out there that are willing to spend $100MM more than the Astros. Winning bidding wars for those guys on 7+ year deals seems highly likely to be a pyrrhic victory to me.JCA1 said:
Thinking more long term, this suggests that Crane is a man of his word regarding longterm contracts and just does not have any interest in offering 8 or 10 year deals. Without saying whether that's the right decision or not, it is at odds with the fair market value for all-stars in their 20s. So, to the extent we develop any future all-stars, are we destined to see them get traded as they approach free agency?
EastCoastAgNc said:Hasn't Nolan already started to show some of the same falloff over the last year that Abreu did before he signed here?Ag_07 said:
Get STL to eat some of his remaining contract and insert him at 3B and slide Paredes to 1B.
long way to go yet, obviously, but, bryce harpertxags92 said:Here is a thought exercise. Name a 6+ year deal given to a 26+ year old player in MLB that still looks like a good deal in year 6. I can't think of any case where a guy was given a long blockbuster contract where the team isn't working in the last year or two of the deal to find a way to get rid of them with somebody else taking on some of the contract. As long as we keep making smart moves with prospects, I think Crane's approach is probably the right one as long as there are teams out there that are willing to spend $100MM more than the Astros. Winning bidding wars for those guys on 7+ year deals seems highly likely to be a pyrrhic victory to me.JCA1 said:
Thinking more long term, this suggests that Crane is a man of his word regarding longterm contracts and just does not have any interest in offering 8 or 10 year deals. Without saying whether that's the right decision or not, it is at odds with the fair market value for all-stars in their 20s. So, to the extent we develop any future all-stars, are we destined to see them get traded as they approach free agency?
We usually try to avoid guys who start to be terrible.TarponChaser said:
Are the Astros going to let Verlander walk or make an offer? I might be sentimental about it but would he sign a 1-2 year deal? Maybe with a club option for a third?
Nolan Ryan 75,000tjack16 said:Wabs said:
On a scale of 1-10 hurting as an Astros fan (10 the worst):
Springer 10
Correa 8
Tucker 3
Springer 10
Correa 9
Tucker 5 (not hurt, just hate losing his talent)
Bregman 8
Tucker is on a different talent level than the others, but I don't think of him when I think "heart of the team" like I do with the other guys. Probably due to their roles in the 2017-2019 run
That one still hurts.The Porkchop Express said:Nolan Ryan 75,000tjack16 said:Wabs said:
On a scale of 1-10 hurting as an Astros fan (10 the worst):
Springer 10
Correa 8
Tucker 3
Springer 10
Correa 9
Tucker 5 (not hurt, just hate losing his talent)
Bregman 8
Tucker is on a different talent level than the others, but I don't think of him when I think "heart of the team" like I do with the other guys. Probably due to their roles in the 2017-2019 run
— Houston Astros (@astros) December 13, 2024
The 2019 team was insane, and then there were 2…. pic.twitter.com/apltC6EoQb
— Astroholic (@AstroholicAnon) December 13, 2024
Harper - looks great thru 6 yearstxags92 said:Here is a thought exercise. Name a 6+ year deal given to a 26+ year old player in MLB that still looks like a good deal in year 6. I can't think of any case where a guy was given a long blockbuster contract where the team isn't working in the last year or two of the deal to find a way to get rid of them with somebody else taking on some of the contract. As long as we keep making smart moves with prospects, I think Crane's approach is probably the right one as long as there are teams out there that are willing to spend $100MM more than the Astros. Winning bidding wars for those guys on 7+ year deals seems highly likely to be a pyrrhic victory to me.JCA1 said:
Thinking more long term, this suggests that Crane is a man of his word regarding longterm contracts and just does not have any interest in offering 8 or 10 year deals. Without saying whether that's the right decision or not, it is at odds with the fair market value for all-stars in their 20s. So, to the extent we develop any future all-stars, are we destined to see them get traded as they approach free agency?
Johnsy3 said:The 2019 team was insane, and then there were 2…. pic.twitter.com/apltC6EoQb
— Astroholic (@AstroholicAnon) December 13, 2024
I know I'm not the only one who feels this way, but 2019 will always haunt me. BECAUSE I'm 100% certain that Manfred knew the Athletic article was coming out and couldn't have the Astros win. It was rigged.
I bet Astros pitchers were given juiced balls to throw while Nationals pitchers were given dead ones. Along with paid umps