That's really close
Not necessarily specific to Houston, but the math on the RSN business has always been pretty simple:Booma94 said:Good info. Thanks for the insider perspective.iamtheglove said:Booma94 said:Watching a game on SCHN is somewhat challenging. I don't know if the director has ever really watched a quality baseball game production, but the lack of timely replays, missed shots, constant zoom/focus on players in place of replays, and the general shoddy production lead one to wonder. Sometimes it seems like they might only have 2 cameras being used on the broadcast.Frok said:
This year's cameraman keeps doing HR angle on flyouts
I worked in this industry for my entire career before I retired in 2023. A couple of data points that have impacted regional productions everywhere: 1. MLB pace of play initiatives have made it much harder to get replays in and especially multiple looks at the same play. 2.many of the best operators retired over the last 5 years. RSNs started in the 1980's and most operators were in their 20s. They are now in their 60s and the grind of live production has taken its toll. I know factually that several of the best Houston ops retired in the last 2-3 years. That's why you saw pretty below average camera 4 (high home) work in 2022. 3. Financial issues - these networks are all bleeding cash. That puts pressure on producers and directors to incorporate a heavier in game ad sales load of features. We spent a ton of time where I worked trying to optimize how to do it without disrupting the pace of the broadcast. All of that has added up to some of the issues you identified.
Does the fact that the team partially owns the network help or hurt the cash situation, because the RSN fee has fewer people with their spoons in the pot and RSN fees keep increasing?
NopeWabs said:
Let's see if we can take advantage of another dropped ball gift
there was one out....gambochaman said:
Ah yes
The ole stranded leadoff double