SpaceCityAg05 said:
I agree in the immediate sense. I just think they have long staying power and have shown a willingness to spend or bid on big free agents. If they get a Rangers-like spending itch on bats, they have the cheap, quality pitching to get good in a hurry, unlike the Rangers that have to depend on massive overspending to acquire and keep pitching.
Speaking of the Rangers, if they don't resign Montgomery, I cannot see them making the playoffs next year with that staff.
Agree and Agree
Seattle could be dangerous if they go all in. They aren't willing to and I am good with that.
The Rangers are going to have to hit, hit, and hit some more. They have a weak rotation & bullpen. None of their pitching has developed.
Look at the Rangers starters from the Eno projctions.
57. Eovaldi
71. Gray
82. Scherzer (not projected back until June/July)
97. Heaney
131. Dunning
They don't even have 5 healthy top-150 starters.