Legal Custodian said:
Love that set up. I'll take it one step further and move the Rays to Charlotte as well. No one pays attention or goes to the games there. Still fits the south demographic too.
I agree that Portland would make more send than Salt Lake.
The real issue that hopefully MLB solves this time around in expansion is giving teams to cities before the stadium situation is resolved. The Trop was a dump when the Rays moved in 25 years ago and it should have been obvious to everyone that a stadium that requires special rules because the ball hits the roof girders so often is not a MLB quality stadium. The Diamondbacks had their stadium ready to go for opening day, and the Rockies had a good plan to build Coors after playing 2 seasons in Mile High, but with both the Marlins and the Rays MLB **** the bed and screwed over any chance of building a strong fan base right from day one.
Also, when it comes to these stadium deals, I lived in the bay area for a while, and the politics of a new stadium for Oakland were very complex. The A's and the city both wanted to make it happen, but under very different conditions. The city was looking for the A's to invest in the kind of stadium area that would revitalize Oakland, but of course the A's don't have any kind of responsibility to save a **** hole city.
So because the A's and the city couldn't agree on an area/price in Oakland, the A's explored a small move out of Oakland, closer to an area that would likely support baseball better and keep what little of a fan base they have intact, so the Fremont/San Jose area, but then there were complications with how MLBs markets are set up and how that would affect the Giants. The Giants have been able to keep this mostly quiet, but they are a big part of the issue here, essentially screwing over the A's by not being willing to compromise on their territory.
So basically, no matter the belly aching of Oakland, or any actual A's fans, the situation was a lose lose one for the franchise. Either give in to the extortion of the city and build your new park where you don't want it and be forced to subsidize affordable housing and infrastructure for Oakland, or move the team.
Again, hopefully, MLB has all of these problems sorted well in advance of any further expansion. Also, the league needs to attract more owners like Steve Cohen who just want to spend and win. These narratives of "small market" BS need to stop. Tampa Bay has the 18th largest metro population in the country and yet they draw only 10k per game. Pittsburgh has a metro of 2.4 million, and they run themselves like they are located in Bismarck.
If you put an entertaining and winning product on the field, and give the fans a fun and convenient experience, then the fans will come. If you bellyache and whine about your market all the time, sell off your good players, and always start the next round of the 5 year rebuilding plan, of course your fans won't come to your games. Even the Rays method of winning is super alienating to fans. By the time you have a favorite player, the team is exploring shipping them off. To build fans, you need Biggios, Bagwells, Berkmans, Oswalts, Kinslers, Michael Youngs etc. that fans can grow up with and cheer for through the years. San Diego gets this, and has decided that if you're a Padres fan, you're going to cheer for Cronenworth, Tatis, Machado, Boegarts, Darvish for the next 7 years. The team is going to have continuity, and that is good for fans.