linkdude said:
This would've happened this week, likely, but Dusty just edged past Hinch in win pct. Just thought y'all would like to know that.
I'm going to need to look up the Phil Garner tie???
linkdude said:
This would've happened this week, likely, but Dusty just edged past Hinch in win pct. Just thought y'all would like to know that.
I'm going to need to look up "Salty" Parker. That may be the best nickname ever.JABQ04 said:linkdude said:
This would've happened this week, likely, but Dusty just edged past Hinch in win pct. Just thought y'all would like to know that.
I'm going to need to look up the Phil Garner tie???
2005 game that was restarted from the beginning after rain postponement in Cincy. Called it a "tie" because stats still count. Did a double header makeup the same weekend.JABQ04 said:linkdude said:
This would've happened this week, likely, but Dusty just edged past Hinch in win pct. Just thought y'all would like to know that.
I'm going to need to look up the Phil Garner tie???
Here's to lots of 25-inning games between the #4 and #5 seeds!tjack16 said:
It will be very nice to watch playoff baseball this coming weekend without any stress
Too bad thanks to our idiotic commish we have the silly runner on 2nd making extra long games less likely. Basically it punishes the teams with byes.The Porkchop Express said:Here's to lots of 25-inning games between the #4 and #5 seeds!tjack16 said:
It will be very nice to watch playoff baseball this coming weekend without any stress
That rule isn't around in the playoffs.Prosperdick said:Too bad thanks to our idiotic commish we have the silly runner on 2nd making extra long games less likely. Basically it punishes the teams with byes.The Porkchop Express said:Here's to lots of 25-inning games between the #4 and #5 seeds!tjack16 said:
It will be very nice to watch playoff baseball this coming weekend without any stress
Not sure why this rain interrupted game was handled this way but this was quite common before WWII and the age of baseball before lights. During this time games were occasionally called due to darkness. If the game was tied at the time it was not resumed from the point it was called but replayed entirely. All stats of such a game were counted but the game itself did not count in the standings. A couple of famous examples of this are Game Two of the 1912 World Series and Game Two of the 1922 World Series.Bregxit said:Buck Compton said:2005 game that was restarted from the beginning after rain postponement in Cincy. Called it a "tie" because stats still count. Did a double header makeup the same weekend.JABQ04 said:linkdude said:
This would've happened this week, likely, but Dusty just edged past Hinch in win pct. Just thought y'all would like to know that.
I'm going to need to look up the Phil Garner tie???
I just looked that up. I wonder why they started from the beginning rather than resuming in the 8th inning. That seems really strange.
Oh yeah, that's right. C'mon 25 innings!!!Buck Compton said:That rule isn't around in the playoffs.Prosperdick said:Too bad thanks to our idiotic commish we have the silly runner on 2nd making extra long games less likely. Basically it punishes the teams with byes.The Porkchop Express said:Here's to lots of 25-inning games between the #4 and #5 seeds!tjack16 said:
It will be very nice to watch playoff baseball this coming weekend without any stress
Extra-long playoff game anyone?Prosperdick said:Oh yeah, that's right. C'mon 25 innings!!!Buck Compton said:That rule isn't around in the playoffs.Prosperdick said:Too bad thanks to our idiotic commish we have the silly runner on 2nd making extra long games less likely. Basically it punishes the teams with byes.The Porkchop Express said:Here's to lots of 25-inning games between the #4 and #5 seeds!tjack16 said:
It will be very nice to watch playoff baseball this coming weekend without any stress
Mathguy64 said:
I wonder if there has ever been a team spend so much in season money and player capital two years running like the Padres only to get jilted. Because they would be big time underdogs against the Mets.
Mathguy64 said:
Mets are cratering.
🎺vs. 🎺 pic.twitter.com/oVNx4zMh2A
— Rob Friedman (@PitchingNinja) October 3, 2022
Mathguy64 said:
There is a possibility that both NY teams will fall short of 100 wins. Da Jankees are at 97 but get the Rangers at the end. The Mets are at 98 get the Nats.
Da Jankees were at one point being pushed as having a shot at 120. Yeah that's a swing and a miss.
the Mets lack of power has been an issue all year long -- I wrote about it in May, it'll hurt them in October -- but also I'm hesitant to hammer on it too much because NY is going to win, like, 99 or 100 games. It's been an incredibly good season.
— Mike Petriello (@mike_petriello) October 3, 2022
This is why Dubon plays CF for JV per Dusty.Teddy Perkins said:
How is Dubon that close to Yordan's cannon?