We did. 12U AAA got sent to play in Lake Charles.
Is your team based out of Beaumont and named for a baseball equipment company? Or still based out of Beaumont with a really good 12U team coached by a former Aggie baseball stud?
We didn't play that poorly but nowhere near what we're capable. We were up 5-0 in our first pool game and ended up losing 9-6 to the eventual champs. Then lost the first round of bracket 8-5. In both games our pitchers just couldn't find the zone and we walked a lot of guys. Only 2 errors in 3 games but they were costly. Went 1-2 when we're capable of so much better.
And, if we face a kid who throws slower than about 60 and/or can locate a curve for a strike about 3 out of 7 pitches we just will not hit it. We've been working on it and the coaches drilling it into them to recognize the pitch and try to hit it the other way but they're not getting it yet. I know my boy struck out 3 times this weekend, all swinging at curves- one would have been ball 4 that bounced 2 feet in front of home plate and the other two he was so far in front of it he could have swung the bat 3 times. He did get a hit off a curve where he was way out in front but managed to pop a little blooper off the end of the bat over the 3B.
It doesn't matter if they face 70-75mph they don't get beat by velocity but slow it down and they're lost.
The fields in Lake Charles were nice. Pretty much brand new turf infields. The one problem I have is that the mounds were so short that my kid and our two other hardest throwers (all between 5'5" and 5'10") had natural strides that had them landing right at the front lip of the mound so their plant foot slips off the mound on every pitch. So my kid and one other kid shortened up their stride to be able to throw strikes but it also robbed them of their velocity because they could only throw about 60% effort which had them throwing low-50's instead of mid- to upper-60's and they got shelled. And the 5'10" kid who throws low-70's didn't adjust and walked in a bunch of runs.
That's probably my biggest issue with the turf fields is a lot of places cheap out on the mounds or they get torn up and don't fix them. I know with my kid I can look at his game by game stats and tell you from those whether or not the mounds were in good shape or were too small.
As for the ZT Elite 12U National Prospects team you're referring to, the answer is in the name. They're billing that team as a "national" team. They have 4 kids from Texas and the Jersey kid when most of the kids are from California. ZT and lots of other organizations try to have a truly elite, "sponsored" team where the kids' families don't pay a thing that can go out and win huge tournaments so they get skins on the wall and "develop" talent that signs with college programs or gets drafted. They use those credentials to sucker in in Little Timmy's parents with promises of development and future scholarships or getting drafted and Little Timmy's parents (along with all the other AA kids) pay the freight for the elite teams plus profit to the organization.
And the parents who have their kids playing so they're the oldest kids in their classes and taking full advantage of the age cut-off rules do it so their kid can dominate and be seen a stud in their respective age classes.
This is the kid's profile that you're referring to. I don't know anything about him or his family but he's playing 12U and is a full year older than my 11-year old playing 12U as they're both 6th graders (class of 2028). This kid looks like a grown ass man already and has clearly hit puberty. My kid still looks like a little kid. So while they're in 12U this other kid is a far, far better player. But will he still be when he's 17 and mine is 16 in their junior year of HS? Has he come close to his peak because he's going to be 6'0" when he's done growing?
I agree with the Gladwell theory about holding kids back so they get more reps and exposure and time to mature relative to their peers but I think that analysis needs more context in relation to physical tools. Meaning, if a player is fairly average in physical tools (size, speed, hitting power, throwing velocity) then those extra reps vs. their peers matter more. But, if you're an "outlier" (pun intended) in those characteristics (either better or worse) than all the extra reps don't matter as much. So if you're a 6'4" pitcher throwing 94mph at 17 but you're the youngest kid in your senior class and graduate at 17 you're actually probably going to get more looks than the 6'1" pitcher throwing 94mph who is already 18 and closer to being topped out. How many of those kids have already hit puberty and are close to their peak while others haven't popped yet?
For example, there's a pitcher for McNeese State named
Cameron Foster who played for my kid's coach from 9U through HS. He was younger for his grade and played at a HS with a poor baseball program. Anyway, he was only about 175-180# in HS and throwing 86mph (
Perfect Game prospect profile). Well, he played juco ball and is now a 5th year senior at McNeese who is now supposedly closer to 6'7" than his listed 6'5", weighs about 245# throwing 96. He still has some control issues but being 6'7" 245 and throwing 96 with room to grow will get him drafted.
As for coaches cussing out kids, I think a lot has to do with age level. But some parents are OK with it. I was having a talk with my oldest the other day and asking him why he did better with one coach vs. another and he flat out said, "I think I do better with Coach X because he's constantly on my butt to do better and pushing me." Said coach got on to him recently because my boy was visibly tired and the coach said, "Are you tired? Good. Because let me tell you, no coach will feel sorry for you if you're acting tired. That's just a sign for us to push you even harder."