More importantly, we need to come up for the term when Peña hits a homerun.
Peñata
Peña popper
WhalloPeña
Peñata
Peña popper
WhalloPeña
CoachRTM said:Farmer1906 said:CoachRTM said:
Our 7-8-9 is going to be a black hole for most of the season, but our 1-6 can carry us to the division title barring any major injuries.
We do have $33 million to spend, so I would expect that we're not done putting the roster together yet.
Why a black hole?
Between Chas and Jake they had almost 500 PAs last year and both had a 107 OPS+.
Pena had a 900 plus OPS in AAA in his limited time. He killed it in rookie fall ball. And was decent the last 2 years in LIDOM. ZIPs projects him at .728 OPS. Probably just below league average, but average for a SS.
You got me at catcher. If Dusty insists on player Maldonado 80% and inserting Castro in not idea platoon splits then it'll stay bad. But there is a path for it to not be bad.
Catcher is a black hole, but one that you accept as a team when they give you good defense, etc.
Forgive me if I'm not bullish on Peña yet. He was a fringe prospect, barely on any radars who had a decent minor league season, thrust into a starting MLB job because we struck out on two better options. If he's league average for shortstop, I'll eat my crow, but he's only 10/1 on rookie of the year because he's one of the only ones shoe-horned into a starting spot on a contending team.
Chas/Jake might be serviceable. It's not fair to call them a black hole, I'll give you that. My 7-9 comment was more about the fact that during the regular season you normally have a "AAAA" type guy in the starting lineup giving a regular a day off.
Our "normal" starting lineup will more than likely look like this :
1. Altuve
2. Tucker
3. Bregman
4. Alvarez
5. Yuli
6. McCormick/ Meyers
7. Goodrum/Diaz/ other backup player
8. Peña
9. Maldonado
(I'm giving Brantley the day off here in this scenario, but it will obviously rotate around our normal top 6 guys)
Legends. #AstrosST pic.twitter.com/whHUmGO3MW
— Houston Astros (@astros) March 20, 2022
Farmer1906 said:
Why would our "normal" starting lineup mean we'd sit a starter?
Marvin said:CoachRTM said:Farmer1906 said:CoachRTM said:
Our 7-8-9 is going to be a black hole for most of the season, but our 1-6 can carry us to the division title barring any major injuries.
We do have $33 million to spend, so I would expect that we're not done putting the roster together yet.
Why a black hole?
Between Chas and Jake they had almost 500 PAs last year and both had a 107 OPS+.
Pena had a 900 plus OPS in AAA in his limited time. He killed it in rookie fall ball. And was decent the last 2 years in LIDOM. ZIPs projects him at .728 OPS. Probably just below league average, but average for a SS.
You got me at catcher. If Dusty insists on player Maldonado 80% and inserting Castro in not idea platoon splits then it'll stay bad. But there is a path for it to not be bad.
Catcher is a black hole, but one that you accept as a team when they give you good defense, etc.
Forgive me if I'm not bullish on Peña yet. He was a fringe prospect, barely on any radars who had a decent minor league season, thrust into a starting MLB job because we struck out on two better options. If he's league average for shortstop, I'll eat my crow, but he's only 10/1 on rookie of the year because he's one of the only ones shoe-horned into a starting spot on a contending team.
Chas/Jake might be serviceable. It's not fair to call them a black hole, I'll give you that. My 7-9 comment was more about the fact that during the regular season you normally have a "AAAA" type guy in the starting lineup giving a regular a day off.
Our "normal" starting lineup will more than likely look like this :
1. Altuve
2. Tucker
3. Bregman
4. Alvarez
5. Yuli
6. McCormick/ Meyers
7. Goodrum/Diaz/ other backup player
8. Peña
9. Maldonado
(I'm giving Brantley the day off here in this scenario, but it will obviously rotate around our normal top 6 guys)
Well, there goes the season… and here I was being all positive!
CoachRTM said:
Forgive me if I'm not bullish on Peña yet. He was a fringe prospect, barely on any radars who had a decent minor league season, thrust into a starting MLB job because we struck out on two better options. If he's league average for shortstop, I'll eat my crow, but he's only 10/1 on rookie of the year because he's one of the only ones shoe-horned into a starting spot on a contending team.
Correa’s mother in law shared the same tweets that stated the Astros ghosted him this week. That seems to confirm what several people reported. Weird. I hope Click and/or Crane is asked about it
— The Astros Locker (@TheAstrosLocker) March 20, 2022
Something very cool about seeing Reggie in an Astros uni!tjack16 said:Legends. #AstrosST pic.twitter.com/whHUmGO3MW
— Houston Astros (@astros) March 20, 2022
EastCoastAgNc said:
If you don't want to make another offer, fine. Say "our previous offer stands, let us know if you're still interested". Complete radio silence isn't right if that's what happened.
EastCoastAgNc said:Correa’s mother in law shared the same tweets that stated the Astros ghosted him this week. That seems to confirm what several people reported. Weird. I hope Click and/or Crane is asked about it
— The Astros Locker (@TheAstrosLocker) March 20, 2022
I know most of y'all called bs on this, but it might have some merit
Who knows. If their track record stands, probably not any big signings. Certainly you could spend through trade, but I don't see them doing that. Also keep in mind that arbitration hearings won't happen until after the season starts, so that's going to cut into some of what's remaining.Wabs said:
So the money that could have been spent on Correa or Story? Astros just gonna do nothing?
Agree this is most likely what happened. I'm ok with the Astros approach. Loved what CC did here but as far as I'm concerned he can go have fun in lovely Minnesota. I just wish the Stros would have gotten Story, or have plans to spend the money on someone else.agproducer said:
I'm sure it went like this:
Astros told CC and Boras that was the final offer.
CC and Boras wanted to negotiate.
The Astros offer was firm, had told them so, and didn't follow up, begging for CC to come back.
Boras and CC called trying to negotiate. Astros got messages asking for negotiations. They did not return calls, hence what CC claims was ghosting.
From the Astros perspective, if you've given your last and best offer, there's no need for negotiations and therefore, no need for conversation. Sometimes business is that way.
CoachRTM said:
More importantly, we need to come up for the term when Peña hits a homerun.
Peñata
Peña popper
WhalloPeña
bearkatag15 said:
Correa wanted Crane to cup his balls while begging for him sign with the Astros. Good for Crane to stand firm.
I'm liking Peña popper for home runs.Lonestar_Ag09 said:CoachRTM said:
More importantly, we need to come up for the term when Peña hits a homerun.
Peñata
Peña popper
WhalloPeña
These are very solid.
No longer sad. It is what it is. Let’s ride my Astros 🥰🥰 pic.twitter.com/Z6yalAIlkE
— 💎 space cowgirl euni 💎 (@xeunisse) March 20, 2022
agproducer said:I'm liking Peña popper for home runs.Lonestar_Ag09 said:CoachRTM said:
More importantly, we need to come up for the term when Peña hits a homerun.
Peñata
Peña popper
WhalloPeña
These are very solid.
WhalloPeña seems like a good nickname.
Security footage of Crane talking Correa deal last week.Proudag06 said:
If you have given your best and final offer and they reject it, is it really ghosting? That's not ghosting him, that's ending negotiations.