iBrad said:
I realize some of the MLB scouts that post on this thread have given up on Tucker, but there's a reason every team asks for him in a trade. He's too promising of a prospect to ship off for two years of control for someone. We got two years of Cole without losing one of our top two prospects. That's how it should be. If we trade Tucker, it better damn be for more than two years of control.
Disclaimer: I'm not a major league scout...
No one really knows how these guys are going to pan out. Even the stud prospects like Tucker. Guys can mash all the way through the minors and not amount to much in the bigs. Obviously experts see a lot in Tucker. Experts saw a lot in Jon Singleton too...and in a ton of other guys that didn't pan out.
I remember when Byron Buxton was the #1 prospect in MLB and Mookie Betts was #75 (Buxton is exactly a year younger, 25 y/o today). Buxton now has a.285 MLB OBP in upward of 1000 PA.
I think Tucker looks like a newborn deer calf swinging a lead bat but I also see his MiLB stats and the scouting reports and realize I'm obviously missing something. But those thinking he's a surefire stud are just as in the dark as I am about his future. It's stupid to think you know either way. All you have to do is look at the historical MLB top prospects lists and see how many of those guys at the top either did not pan out or were nothing special at the major league level.
Maybe he will turn out to be Yelich and maybe he will be another Buxton...but
I'm sure we could have gotten Yelich for him this past January. I'm not saying that's proof we should trade him, but to all those railing against trading him, it's truly coin flip either way.
Good thing there are smarter people than me making the decisions, but I would have already traded him for Realmuto. I would not have traded him for Yelich. I remember thinking at the time of the MIA-MIL trade that Yelich was going to have a Nick Markakis-like career and he wasn't worth Tucker.
Oops.